Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

In an open-label parallel groups blinded-endpoint randomized clinical trial, the investigators aim to assess the safety and efficacy of conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) vs anticoagulation monotherapy on outcomes of patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism. The investigators hypothesize that CDT will have a superior efficacy and safety compared with anticoagulation-only therapy regarding the proportion of patients with a right ventricle to left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio > 0.9 at a 3-month follow-up by an imaging core laboratory, major bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, or vascular access complication.


Clinical Trial Description

Treatment of intermediate risk PE is still debated. Despite the promising results of small studies on the efficacy and safety of systemic thrombolytic therapy, larger trials failed to show a net clinical benefit. Pulmonary EmbolIsmTHrOmbolysis (PEITHO) trial which compared the full-dose systemic thrombolysis (i.e., tenecteplase) versus anticoagulation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk PE showed significant lower incidence of mortality or hemodynamic collapse in the first 7 days after randomization in patients who received tenecteplase (2.6% vs 5.6% in placebo group, [odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.87; P value, 0.02]). However the mortality benefit was neutralized by the increased risk of major bleeding in thrombolytic arm (11.5% vs 2.4% in the tenecteplase and placebo group, respectively. Importantly, during the long-term follow up (median of 37.8 months) of PEITHO participants, the thrombolytic therapy failed to improve the RV right ventricular function, residual dyspnea ( 36% in thrombolysis group vs 30.1% in the placebo group), or mortality rates (20.3% in thrombolysis group vs 18 % in the placebo group ). CTEPH occurred in ( 2.1% in thrombolysis group vs 3.2% in the placebo group. The lack of benefit of full-dose thrombolytic in PEITHO, might have several explanations. Intermediate risk PE compose of heterogenous group of patients with different prognosis in whom one fits all approach would not be applicable. This heterogeneity in prognosis were underlined in the latest guideline of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) which classified the intermediate-risk PE category into two groups of intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk patients according to the right ventricle function and cardiac biomarker levels. Second, lower-dose thrombolytic regimen might result in the same benefit with lower bleeding events. CDT, by delivering drug locally, claims to increase the efficacy of thrombolytic agents and consequently decrease the required dose which might translate to lower bleeding events. In an open-label parallel groups blinded-endpoint randomized clinical trial, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) vs anticoagulation-only therapy in patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism. The hypothesis is that CDT will have a superior efficacy and safety regarding the proportion of patients with a RV/LV ratio > 0.9 at a 3-month follow-up assessed by an imaging core laboratory with the lower complications of major bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, and vascular access complication. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05172115
Study type Interventional
Source Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center
Contact
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 3
Start date December 22, 2018
Completion date May 2, 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05050617 - Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Terminated NCT04558125 - Low-Dose Tenecteplase in Covid-19 Diagnosed With Pulmonary Embolism Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT06017271 - Predictive Value of Epicardial Adipose Tissue for Pulmonary Embolism and Death in Patients With Lung Cancer
Completed NCT03915925 - Short-term Clinical Deterioration After Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Completed NCT02502396 - Rivaroxaban Utilization for Treatment and Prevention of Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Experience at a Comprehensive Cancer Center
Recruiting NCT05171075 - A Study Comparing Abelacimab to Dalteparin in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal/Genitourinary Cancer and Associated VTE Phase 3
Completed NCT04454554 - Prevalence of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Dyspnea on Exertion (PEDIS)
Completed NCT03173066 - Ferumoxytol as a Contrast Agent for Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Angiography Phase 1
Terminated NCT03002467 - Impact Analysis of Prognostic Stratification for Pulmonary Embolism N/A
Completed NCT02334007 - Extended Low-Molecular Weight Heparin VTE Prophylaxis in Thoracic Surgery Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02611115 - Optimizing Protocols for the Individual Patient in CT Pulmonary Angiography. N/A
Completed NCT01975090 - The SENTRY Clinical Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01357941 - Need for Antepartum Thromboprophylaxis in Pregnant Women With One Prior Episode of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) N/A
Completed NCT01326507 - Prognostic Value of Heart-type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein (h-FABP) in Acute Pulmonary Embolism N/A
Completed NCT00771303 - Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy:a Multicenter Outcome Study
Completed NCT00780767 - Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Case of Massive Pulmonary Embolism Phase 2
Completed NCT00720915 - D-dimer to Select Patients With First Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism Who Can Have Anticoagulants Stopped at 3 Months N/A
Completed NCT02476526 - Safety of Low Dose IV Contrast CT Scanning in Chronic Kidney Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT00773448 - Screening for Occult Malignancy in Patients With Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism N/A
Completed NCT00244725 - Odiparcil For The Prevention Of Venous Thromboembolism Phase 2