Enoxaparin Versus Placebo for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Low Risk Cancer Patients After Surgical Procedures: a Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial Pilot Study

Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Trial

Official title: Enoxaparin Versus Placebo for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Low Risk Cancer Patients After Surgical Procedures: a Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial Pilot Study

Status Withdrawn

Clinical Trial Summary

Post-surgical bleeding is a major source of morbidity in cancer patients, and ramifications can include need for transfusion, increased length of hospital stay, unexpected return to the operating room, or even death. Current guidelines support that all cancer patients who require surgical procedures receive post-operative blood thinners to minimize risk for blood clots in the legs or lungs, known as venous thromboembolism (VTE), but these medications have an unfavorable risk/benefit relationship among patients at low risk for VTE. The proposed work will pilot a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial to critically examine the role of de-implementation of current guidelines that mandate blood thinning medications among cancer patients at low risk for VTE who require surgical procedures; the pilot trial will allow optimization of the design of a future pragmatic multicenter trial, which ultimately would maximize patient safety after surgical procedures for cancer.

Clinical Trial Description

Post-operative bleeding is a major source of morbidity in cancer patients who require surgery. Bleeding is a primary concern for oncology providers because of its short and long term implications, including unanticipated transfusion, increased length of hospitalization, unexpected return to the operating room, or even death. Despite these risks, current guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in surgical patients support provision of anticoagulant medications to all post-operative patients. New data shows that current practice has an unfavorable risk/benefit relationship for the majority of cancer patients who need surgery. Cancer and need for a surgical procedure are two recognized risk factors for VTE-this has created the perception that post-operative anticoagulants are appropriate for all cancer patients. Current VTE prevention guidelines are largely geared toward the "average" cancer patient who requires surgery, based on aggregate data from large groups of surgical patients who have similar procedures. Emerging data demonstrates that the 2005 Caprini score, a patient-centric VTE risk calculator, can identify a 15-fold variation in post-operative VTE risk among the overall surgical population. Data from our National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) center support that the Caprini score is valid specifically in oncologic surgery patients, and that 50% of cancer patients have Caprini scores ≤6 with an expected 90-day VTE rate of less than one percent. Our preliminary data show that low risk Caprini ≤6 patients have a substantial increase in bleeding (3.8% vs. 1.8%) but have no demonstrable VTE risk reduction when post-operative anticoagulants are provided. Current guidelines that mandate chemical prophylaxis for cancer patients who have surgical procedures require a strategy that has no proven benefit and may produce a bleeding-related harm. The proposed work will utilize current paradigms of individualized VTE risk stratification to identify cancer surgery patients at low risk for VTE and will examine the impact of de-implementation of chemical prophylaxis in this low risk population The investigators will conduct a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled pilot trial at the Huntsman Cancer Institute, which is an NCCN site. The trial will identify surgical patients at low risk (Caprini score ≤6) for post-operative VTE and will randomize them to standard of care (enoxaparin 40mg once daily) versus placebo for the duration of inpatient stay. The trial will generate critical, real world data from an NCCN site that quantifies patient eligibility & patient and provider willingness to randomize as well as expected 90-day attrition and event rates. This pilot study would generate trial-specific infrastructure and experience while providing data necessary for sample size calculations for a larger pragmatic trial to fully examine the impact of chemical prophylaxis de-implementation in cancer surgery patients at low risk for VTE. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Bleeding as Surgical Complication (Treatment)
• Deep Venous Thrombosis
• Embolism
• Pulmonary Embolism
• Thromboembolism
• Thrombosis
• Venous Thromboembolism
• Venous Thrombosis

• NCT number: NCT03988231
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: University of Utah
• Status: Withdrawn
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: July 2021
• Completion date: June 2023