Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03264560 |
Other study ID # |
1078220 |
Secondary ID |
1R01HS025395 |
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 27, 2017 |
Est. completion date |
June 24, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2022 |
Source |
University of California, Davis |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
There is a critical shortage of psychiatric services to people with mental illness who live
in Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs), especially those in rural settings. Although real-time
video conferencing psychiatric consultation, termed Synchronous Telepsychiatry (STP), has
been around for almost 3 decades, its adaptation is met with logistic and other challenges.
In this context, the investigators investigate a novel method of psychiatric consultation
termed Asynchronous Telepsychiatry (ATP). The main hypotheses are that that ATP will be as
clinically effective as STP, and that it will be acceptable to patients. This study aims to
evaluate the comparative clinical effectiveness of ATP vs. STP in SNF population, in a
12-month non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial.
Description:
This study aims to assess the acceptability of asynchronous telepsychiatry (ATP) and
synchronous (STP) in rural, Northern California Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) population, in
a 12-month randomized controlled trial.
The study will be conducted at 5 SNFs in Northern California. SNF staff will place a formal
order for psychiatric consultation to the study so that the participants can receive
psychiatric care via ATP or STP. Research assistants will screen each referral by reviewing
inclusion and exclusion criteria based on the psychiatric referral question. To closely match
real-world practice settings, STP "clinic" will be pre-scheduled for 4 hours once per month
for each site. ATP participants will be interviewed by SNF staff (and videotaped with
assistance from research assistant within 5 days). The video will then by reviewed by
research psychiatrist and a consultation report will be send to the PCP in <5 days. Follow-up
will occur at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6- and 12-month time periods, in addition to the baseline (0-month)
visit for a total of 6 consults.
Aim 1: To assess whether ATP and STP models improve clinical outcomes: Hypotheses: Compared
to STP, the ATP arm will: H1: show non-inferior clinical outcome trajectory, reflected in
improvement from baseline, as measured by Clinical Global Impression (CGI).
Aim 2: To assess the acceptability of ATP and STP by examining satisfaction surveys from SNF
residents (who are able to complete the surveys). Hypothesis: Compared to STP, ATP
participants will show: H1: Similar levels of satisfaction as measured by the Telemedicine
Satisfaction Survey as completed by participants.
Aim 3: To conduct healthcare economics and net benefit analysis of cost-effectiveness of ATP
vs. STP in SNFs. H3: ATP, compared to STP, will be more cost effective with respect to SNF
resident satisfaction and reduced wait times.