Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04115748
Other study ID # GS-US-431-4566
Secondary ID 2019-001996-35Ja
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date December 3, 2019
Est. completion date May 11, 2021

Study information

Verified date April 2022
Source Gilead Sciences
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of filgotinib compared to placebo as assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who are naive to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. The study consists of two parts, the Main Study and the Long Term Extension (LTE).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 67
Est. completion date May 11, 2021
Est. primary completion date January 19, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Key Inclusion Criteria: - Meet Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) and have a history consistent with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) = 6 months at Screening - Have active PsA defined as = 3 swollen joints (from a 66 swollen joint count [SJC]) and = 3 tender joints (from a 68 tender joint count [TJC]) at Screening and Day 1; these may or may not be the same joints at Screening and Day 1 - Must have a documented history or active signs of at least one of the following at Screening: - Plaque psoriasis - Nail changes attributed to psoriasis - Have had inadequate response or intolerance to =1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD), apremilast and / or NSAID, administered over the course of = 12 weeks for the treatment of PsA, as per local guidelines / standard of care Key Exclusion Criteria: - Prior PsA or psoriasis treatment with a biologic DMARD - Prior exposure to a janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor > 2 doses - Any active / recent infection - Any chronic and / or uncontrolled medical condition that would put the individual at increased risk during study participation or circumstances which may make an individual unlikely or unable to complete or comply with study procedures and requirements, per investigator judgement - Any moderately to severely active musculoskeletal or skin disorder other than PsA or plaque psoriasis that would interfere with assessment of study parameters, as per judgement of investigator NOTE: Prior history of reactive arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis is permitted if there is documentation of change in diagnosis to PsA or additional diagnosis of PsA - Any history of an inflammatory arthropathy with onset before age 16 years old - Active autoimmune disease that would interfere with assessment of study parameters or increase risk to the individual by participating in the study (e.g. uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, uncontrolled thyroiditis, systemic vasculitis, transverse myelitis), per judgement of investigator - Pregnancy or nursing females - Active drug or alcohol abuse, as per judgement of investigator Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Filgotinib
Tablets administered orally once daily with or without food
Adalimumab
Injection administered subcutaneously once every 2 weeks
Placebo to match filgotinib
Tablets administered orally once daily with or without food
Placebo to match adalimumab
Injection administered subcutaneously once every 2 weeks

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Genesis Research Services Broadmeadow New South Wales
Australia Emeritus Research Camberwell Victoria
Australia Rheumatology Research Unit Maroochydore Queensland
Bulgaria University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Plovdiv AD, Department Of Rheumatology Plovdiv
Bulgaria "Medical center Synexus Sofia" EOOD Sofia
Bulgaria Diagnostic consultative center 17 Sofia EOOD Sofia
Bulgaria Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Lyulin" EAD, Department of Rheumatology Sofia
Bulgaria "Medical center SYNEXUS SOFIA" EOOD, branch Stara Zagora Stara Zagora
Canada G.R.M.O. (Groupe de recherche en maladies osseuses) Inc. Quebec
Czechia CCR Ostrava, s.r.o. Ostrava
Hungary Synexus (DRS) - Synexus Magyarorszag Kft. Budapest Budapest
Hungary Synexus (DRS) - Synexus Magyarorszag Kft. Gyula Gyula
Japan National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center Kawachinagano
Japan Daido Clinic Nagoya
Japan Nagoya City University Hospital Nagoya-City
Japan Keio University Hospital Tokyo
Korea, Republic of CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University Seongnam
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of SMG - SNU Boramae Medical Center Seoul
New Zealand Optimal Clinical Trials Auckland
New Zealand Waikato Hospital Hamilton WKO
New Zealand Capital & Coast District Health Board Newtown
New Zealand Clinical Trials Unit, Timaru Hospital Timaru
Poland Gabinet Internistyczno-Reumatologiczny Piotr Adrian Klimiuk Bialystok, Podlaskie
Poland Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im. dr Jana Biziela Bydgoszcz
Poland NSZOZ Unica CR Dabrówka
Poland Centrum Medyczne Pratia Gdynia Gdynia
Poland Malopolskie Badania Kliniczne SP Z O O Sp. k. Krakow
Poland NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED s.c. Nadarzyn
Poland ETYKA Osrodek Badan Klinicznych Olsztyn
Poland Pheuma Medicus Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Warsaw
Poland Centrum Medyczne AMED Warszawa Warszawa
Poland Medycyna Kliniczna Marzena Waszczak-Jeka Warszawa
Poland REUMATOLOG WARSZAWA Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Dr n. med. Jakub Trefler Warszawa
Poland ARS RHEUMATICA Sp. Z.o.o., "REUMATIKA-Centrum Reumatologii", NZOZ Warszawa, Mazowieckie
Poland Centrum Medyczne Oporow Wroclaw
Russian Federation Ulitsa Delegatskaya, 20, Building 1, Ulitsa Kasatkina, 7 Moscow, Russia, 127473/129301 Moskva
Russian Federation LLC "Biomed" Vladimir
Russian Federation Center for medical advice and research - PRACTICE LTD Yaroslavl
Spain Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Cordoba s/n, Rheumatology Service, Madrid, Spain, 28041 Madrid
Spain Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli Sabadell
Spain Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Rheumatology Service, Avda. Valdecilla s/n, Santander, Cantabria, 39008 Santander
Spain Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Sevilla
Taiwan Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital Dailin Township
Taiwan Chang Gung Medical Foundation Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung
Taiwan Chang Gung Medical Foundation Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Keelung
Taiwan Far Eastern Memorial Hospital New Taipei City
Taiwan Chi Mei Medical Center Tainan
Taiwan National Cheng Kung University Hospital Tainan
Taiwan Taipei Medical University Hospital Taipei
United States Bay Area Arthritis and Osteoporosis Brandon Florida
United States Joint and Muscle Research Institute Charlotte North Carolina
United States Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic of Brazos Valley (Drug Shipment Address) College Station Texas
United States Articularis Healthcare Inc, dba, Columbia Arthritis Center, PA Columbia South Carolina
United States Medvin Clinical Research Covina California
United States Omega Research Debary, LLC DeBary Florida
United States Altoona Center for Clinical Research Duncansville Pennsylvania
United States St. Paul Rheumatology, P.A. Eagan Minnesota
United States Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A. Hagerstown Maryland
United States North Georgia Rheumatology Group Lawrenceville Georgia
United States Physician Research Collaaboration, LLCs Lincoln Nebraska
United States Southwest Rheumatology Research, LLC Mesquite Texas
United States San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc. Miami Florida
United States Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC Middleburg Heights Ohio
United States ACME Research, LLC Orangeburg South Carolina
United States Hmd Research Llc Orlando Florida
United States Arthritis Center, Inc. Palm Harbor Florida
United States Clinical Research Source Inc Perrysburg Ohio
United States Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC Saint Clair Shores Michigan
United States Arthritis Consultants, Inc. Saint Louis Missouri
United States West Virginia Research Institute PLLC South Charleston West Virginia
United States BayCare Medical Group, Inc. Tampa Florida
United States ForCare Clinical Research Tampa Florida
United States Atlantic Coast Research Toms River New Jersey

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Gilead Sciences Galapagos NV

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Bulgaria,  Canada,  Czechia,  Hungary,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  New Zealand,  Poland,  Russian Federation,  Spain,  Taiwan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 12 ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: = 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in tender joint count based on 68 joints (TJC68), swollen joint count based on 66 joints (SJC66) and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGADA) using a visual analogue scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); physician's global assessment of disease activity (PHGADA) using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Week 12
Secondary Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16 PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor]; PhGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity];36-item short form survey (SF-36) [a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status];TJC68;SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) [assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis];Tender dactylitis count (TDC) [with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis];C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 MDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the MDA if the participant fulfills at least 5 of the following 7 criteria: TJC68 =1; SJC66 =1; Psoriatic arthritis disease activity score (PASI) =1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA <3% [PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)]; patient's global assessment of PsA pain intensity (PGAPI) =15 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)]; PGADA =20 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)]; HAQ-DI score =0.5; LEI score =1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline. Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 VLDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the VLDA if the participant fulfills all the seven criteria: TJC68 =1; SJC66 =1; PASI score =1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA <3% [PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)]; PGAPI =15 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to (serious pain)]; PGADA =20 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)]; HAQ-DI score =0.5; LEI score =1 with participants with enthesitis at baseline. Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)]; PGAPI [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and >28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering = 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline The PhGAP is used to determine the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. The participant's psoriasis disease activity is assessed by a physician according to the grades of induration, erythema, and scaling on a scale of 0 to 5. The sum of the three grades is used to obtain the total average score. PhGAP is based on the total average score on a scale of 0-5 where, 0 = cleared, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked, and 5 = severe. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at Baseline mNAPSI is used to assess each nail abnormality for each of the participant's nails. Three features or groups of features (pitting, onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, and crumbling) of each fingernail are graded on a scale from 0 (no onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, no pitting, no crumbling) to 3 (>30 onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, >50 pitting, >50% crumbling). Four features (leukonychia, splinter, hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, and red spots in the lunula) are graded with the score of 1 = present or 0 = absent for each fingernail. Each finger has a score between 0 and 13. The total mNAPSI score is the sum of all abnormalities individual score across all fingers, and the total mNAPSI score ranges from 0 to 130. Lower numbers indicate fewer nail abnormalities. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline Enthesitis is assessed using LEI. The enthesitis examination by LEI evaluates the presence or absence of pain by applying local pressure on 6 anatomical sites: medial femoral condyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), and the achilles tendon insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). LEI is derived as the sum of the enthesitis score over the 6 sites mentioned above. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, higher scores indicates greater degree of enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16 The PsAID questionnaire assesses the impact of PsA on people's lives. The PsAID is calculated based on 12 numerical rating scales (NRS) questions. Each NRS is assessed as a number between 0 and 10. Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores, (some of which were multiplied by a weighting factor) divided by 20 for a total possible score of 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse impact of disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16 PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor]; PhGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) [a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status]; TJC68; SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) [assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) [with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis]; C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. PASDAS LDA is defined as PASDAS = 3.2. Weeks 4, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16 PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor]; PhGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) [a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status];TJC68;SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) [assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) [with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis]; C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. PASDAS remission is defined as PASDAS = 1.9. Weeks 4, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: = 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders. Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 ACR50 response is achieved when the participant has: = 50% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders. Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: = 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders. Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 TJC68 is an assessment of 68 joints. Each joint is evaluated as 'normal', 'tender', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all tender joints. The overall tender joint count ranged from 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 SJC66 is an assessment of 66 joints. Each joint was evaluated as 'normal', 'swollen', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The overall swollen joint count ranged from 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 PGADA is assessed by the participants using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 PhGADA is assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 HAQ-DI's pain assessment is done using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The hsCRP is the ACR core set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of filgotinib on the participant's psoriatic arthritis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)] and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28(CRP) = 3.2. Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as DAS28 (CRP) < 2.6. Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Time to Achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28 (CRP) = 3.2. Time to achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAS28 (CRP) LDA. Up to 19 weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)]; PGAPI [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and >28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. DAPSA LDA is defined as DAPSA = 14. Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)]; PGAPI [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and >28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. DAPSA remission is defined as DAPSA = 4. Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Time to Achieve DAPSA LDA DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)]; PGAPI [using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and >28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. Time to achieve DAPSA LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAPSA LDA. If the DAPSA LDA is not achieved during main study phase, the time to achieve DAPSA LDA will be censored at the last non-missing DAPSA LDA assessment date during main study phase. If the component scores of DAPSA LDA are at different dates for a visit, the latest date will be used for the derivation of time to achieve DAPSA LDA. Up to 19 weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the following 4 criteria; = 30% decrease in SJC66, = 30% decrease in TJC68, = 20% decrease in PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), = 20% decrease in PhGADA (VAS; 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity), and with at least one of the 2 joint criteria, with no deterioration in any other criteria. Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). A higher score indicates more severe disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI50, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 50%. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI75, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 75%. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI90, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 90%. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering = 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent [%] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI100, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 100%. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline The enthesitis examination is based on the 16 anatomical sites: the medial epicondyle (left and right), the lateral epicondyle (left and right), the supraspinatus insertion (left and right), the bilateral greater trochanter (left and right), the quadriceps tendon insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), the patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tuberosity (left and right), the achilles tendon insertion (left and right), and the plantar fascia insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as either 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). SPARCC enthesitis index has an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline LDI quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with an at least 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Total score= {{[Circumference involved digit/ Circumference contralateral Digit (or Tables)] - 1}x 100} x Tenderness score. Tenderness score (0 = no tenderness, and 1 = tender). The difference between circumference of affected finger and contralateral not affected digit cannot be defined for maximum value. Therefore, it is difficult to provide scale range for the final score. No theoretical range exists for the Leeds Dactylitis Index. Lower Leeds Dactylitis Index score represent better outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline Tender score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender, 2 = tender and wince, 3 = tender and withdraw) is collected for Dactylitis Assessments on the Dactylitis Score Sheet that is used for calculation of LDI total score. Tender dactylitis count (TDC) equals the number of tender fingers and toes (tendor score >0). For participants with dactylitis status absent for all the fingers and toes, the TDC is set as 0. The total score range of TDC is from 0 to 60, higher scores indicate greater presence of dactylitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually completed by the participant. Responses in each functional category are collected as 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. The eight category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). When 6 or more categories are non-missing, total possible score is 3. If more than 2 categories are missing, the HAQ-DI score is set to missing. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (less disability). Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16 FACIT-Fatigue scale is a brief, 13-item, symptom-specific questionnaire that specifically assesses the self-reported severity of fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and functioning in the past 7 days. The FACIT-Fatigue uses 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) numeric rating scales for a total possible score of 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate less fatigue. Positive change in value indicates improvement (no or less severity of fatigue). Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16 The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement (better health status). Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16 The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement (better health status). Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04152759 - Comparative Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of BAT2506 vs Simponi® in Healthy Subjects Phase 1
Completed NCT03248518 - Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases N/A
Completed NCT01925768 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Apremilast to Treat Psoriatic Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT01892436 - Extension Study up to 3 Years for Secukinumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT01212770 - PALACE 3: Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT05051943 - A Study of the Real-world Use of an Adalimumab Biosimilar and Evaluation of Nutritional Status on the Therapeutic Response
Completed NCT01212757 - PALACE 2: Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT03953378 - CD73+ Th1.17 in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting NCT02572700 - Pain Mechanisms and Ultrasonographic Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis
Completed NCT02556034 - Assessment of Tender & Swollen Joints Count Score Performed by a Rheumatologist And Rheumatology Nurses in Patients With RA and PsA.
Completed NCT02154425 - A Multicenter, Postmarketing Study Evaluating the Concentration of Cimzia® in Mature Breast Milk of Lactating Mothers Phase 1
Completed NCT02188654 - Metformin in Psoriatic Arthritis N/A
Completed NCT02164214 - Does Etanercept Influence Tweak Modulation of Inflammation During Inflammatory Rheumatisms (Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis)? Phase 3
Completed NCT01392326 - Efficacy at 24 Weeks and Long Term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy up to 2 Years of Secukinumab (AIN457) in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Phase 3
Completed NCT01083693 - Quality of Life Outcomes of HUMIRA in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) After Unsustainable Response to Biologicals and Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT00517101 - Presence of IBD Specific Antibodies (ASCA, ALCA, ACCA, AMCA) in the Sera of Patients With Spondyloarthropathy N/A
Completed NCT00133315 - TNFalfa Blocking Treatment of Spondylarthropathies Phase 4
Completed NCT00659412 - A Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Examining the Safety and Efficacy of Alefacept in Psoriatic Arthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT00946686 - To Demonstrate the Relative Bioavailability, Parallel Study Of Leflunomide 20 mg Tablets Under Fasting Conditions Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT06059430 - Cohort Project of Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatism