Psoriatic Arthritis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 2 Single-Arm Open-Label Extension Study to Investigate Safety With Risankizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed Week 24 Visit of Study M16-002 (1311.5)
Verified date | May 2019 |
Source | AbbVie |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is an open-label extension (OLE) study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of risankizumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 145 |
Est. completion date | July 30, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | July 8, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Participants who have completed all doses of study drug and Week 24 visit of the lead-in study. - Women of childbearing potential who are sexually active, must agree to use at least one accepted method of contraception throughout the study, including 20 weeks after last dose of study drug is given. - Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline (Week 0/V1). - Participants must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent, approved by an Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)/Institutional Review Board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any study specific procedures. - Participant is judged to be in good health as determined by the Investigator. Exclusion Criteria: - Female participant who is pregnant, breastfeeding or is considering becoming pregnant during study participation, including 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug is given. - Premature discontinuation of the study drug in the lead-in study for any reason. - Use of a biologic treatment other than risankizumab since first dose of study drug in the lead-in study. - Time elapsed is > 8 weeks since the Week 24 visit in the lead-in study. - Active systemic infections during the last 2 weeks (exception: common cold) prior to the first dose, as assessed by the investigator. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
AbbVie |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent events (TEAEs) are defined as an AE that began or worsened in severity after initiation of study drug and 20 weeks (140 days) after last dose. Abbreviations: NMSC=non-melanoma skin cancer | From the first dose of study drug in this study until 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 56 weeks). | |
Secondary | Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS): Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24 in the Lead-in Study | The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of =0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24 (Lead-in Study) | |
Secondary | mTSS: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24 | The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of =0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24 | |
Secondary | mTSS: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48 | The mTSS is a measure of change in joint health. X-rays of hands, wrists, and feet (including distal interphalangeal joints) were obtained at Week 24 and Week 48. Totals for hands and feet for erosion scores (range 0 to 320) and joint space narrowing scores (range 0 to 208) were calculated and added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 528 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening; no progression was defined as a change of =0.5. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 0 | Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 0: =20% improvement in tender joint count; =20% improvement in swollen joint count; and =20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study. | Week 0 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 4 | Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 4: =20% improvement in tender joint count; =20% improvement in swollen joint count; and =20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study. | Week 4 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12 | Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 12: =20% improvement in tender joint count; =20% improvement in swollen joint count; and =20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study. | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 24 | Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 24: =20% improvement in tender joint count; =20% improvement in swollen joint count; and =20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study. | Week 24 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 36 | Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 36: =20% improvement in tender joint count; =20% improvement in swollen joint count; and =20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study. | Week 36 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 48 | Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 48: =20% improvement in tender joint count; =20% improvement in swollen joint count; and =20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study. | Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 52 | Response defined by ACR20 criteria (improvement from baseline in the lead-in study) at Week 52: =20% improvement in tender joint count; =20% improvement in swollen joint count; and =20% improvement in at least 3 out of the following 5 parameters: Patient's Assessment of Pain Intensity VAS, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein). Baseline is defined as the last non missing pre-treatment observation prior to first dose in the lead-in study. | Week 52 | |
Secondary | Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0 | |
Secondary | HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4 | |
Secondary | HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12 | |
Secondary | HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24 | |
Secondary | HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36 | |
Secondary | HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48 | |
Secondary | HAQ-DI: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52 | The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis that consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52 | |
Secondary | Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0 | The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0 | |
Secondary | SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4 | The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4 | |
Secondary | SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12 | The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12 | |
Secondary | SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24 | The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24 | |
Secondary | SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36 | The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36 | |
Secondary | SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48 | The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48 | |
Secondary | SF-36 PCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52 | The SF-36 Health determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 comprise the physical component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52 | |
Secondary | SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 0 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 0 | |
Secondary | SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 4 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 4 | |
Secondary | SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 12 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 12 | |
Secondary | SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 24 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 24 | |
Secondary | SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 36 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 36 | |
Secondary | SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 48 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 48 | |
Secondary | SF-36 MCS Score: Change From Baseline (in the Lead-in Study) to Week 52 | The SF-36 determined participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 5-8 comprise the mental component of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range = 0-100); a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline is defined as baseline in the lead-in study. | Baseline (Lead-in Study), Week 52 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04152759 -
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of BAT2506 vs Simponi® in Healthy Subjects
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03248518 -
Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01925768 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Apremilast to Treat Psoriatic Arthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01892436 -
Extension Study up to 3 Years for Secukinumab in Psoriatic Arthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01212770 -
PALACE 3: Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05051943 -
A Study of the Real-world Use of an Adalimumab Biosimilar and Evaluation of Nutritional Status on the Therapeutic Response
|
||
Completed |
NCT01212757 -
PALACE 2: Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03953378 -
CD73+ Th1.17 in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02572700 -
Pain Mechanisms and Ultrasonographic Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis
|
||
Completed |
NCT02556034 -
Assessment of Tender & Swollen Joints Count Score Performed by a Rheumatologist And Rheumatology Nurses in Patients With RA and PsA.
|
||
Completed |
NCT02154425 -
A Multicenter, Postmarketing Study Evaluating the Concentration of Cimzia® in Mature Breast Milk of Lactating Mothers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02188654 -
Metformin in Psoriatic Arthritis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02164214 -
Does Etanercept Influence Tweak Modulation of Inflammation During Inflammatory Rheumatisms (Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis)?
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01392326 -
Efficacy at 24 Weeks and Long Term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy up to 2 Years of Secukinumab (AIN457) in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01083693 -
Quality of Life Outcomes of HUMIRA in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) After Unsustainable Response to Biologicals and Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00517101 -
Presence of IBD Specific Antibodies (ASCA, ALCA, ACCA, AMCA) in the Sera of Patients With Spondyloarthropathy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00133315 -
TNFalfa Blocking Treatment of Spondylarthropathies
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00659412 -
A Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Examining the Safety and Efficacy of Alefacept in Psoriatic Arthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00946686 -
To Demonstrate the Relative Bioavailability, Parallel Study Of Leflunomide 20 mg Tablets Under Fasting Conditions
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06059430 -
Cohort Project of Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatism
|