Pseudophakia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Angle Kappa and Different Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas in Acrysof® IQ Panoptix Intraocular Lens Outcomes, Visual Disturbances and Patient Satisfaction
Angle Kappa is considered a potential factor in explaining suboptimal outcomes with intraocular lenses (IOLs), particularly multifocal IOLs. Some evidence suggests this is not the case. This study was designed to investigate correlations between angle kappa and post-surgical outcomes with a trifocal IOL.
The main complaint of patients who received a presbyopia correcting lens (regardless of the design) are visual disturbances such as glare, halos (rings around lights), starbursts (rays around light sources), mainly at night. The degree of limitation or how bothered patients are varies from patient to patient. To explain these symptoms different theories have been proposed including splitting the light into different focal points which decreases the intensity of the light reaching the retina. Most factors are common to all patients who received the lens; however, patients are not equally affected by these symptoms. Angle kappa has been considered a factor. Angle κ is the angle between the visual axis (straight line that passes through both the center of the pupil and the center of the fovea) and the pupillary axis (perpendicular line to the surface of the cornea that passes through the center of the pupil). ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT01193504 -
Randomized, Masked Comparison of Bromfenac and Besifloxacin BID With Either Prednisolone BID or Loteprednol 0.5% BID for Prevention of Retinal Thickening and CME Following Phacoemulsification
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00347243 -
Wavefront Analisys and Contrast Sensitivity of Spherical and Aspherical Intraocular Lenses
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04208633 -
Correlation Between Sulcus Anatomy and Other Parameters After Horizontal & Vertical Intraocular Lens (IOLs) Placements
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06041139 -
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Bilateral PanOptix Verses Bilateral Synergy
|
||
Completed |
NCT04533191 -
Binocular Custom Vision Utilizing The Light Adjustable Lens (LAL)
|
||
Completed |
NCT05735990 -
Retrospective Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Performance of 640PM Trifocal IOL Implantation in Patients With Cataract and/or Ametropia (Hyperopia, Myopia) and/or Presbyopia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04175951 -
Tecnis Eyhance Versus Rayner RayOne Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06056154 -
Safety and Efficacy of the Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens AsqelioTM Monofocal With Biaspheric Design
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05531110 -
Comparison of Two Aspheric Intraocular Lenses for Micro-monovision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01004549 -
An Open-Label Evaluation of Degree of Accommodation in Pseudophakic Patients Bilaterally Implanted With Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03823092 -
Polarization Perception in Health and Disease. Testing a New Sight Test
|
||
Completed |
NCT05226884 -
Intermediate Vision in Patients With Clareon IOLs Compared to Eyhance IOLs
|
||
Completed |
NCT01310127 -
Clinical Outcomes of Bromday (Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution) 0.09% QD vs. Nevanac (Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension) 0.1%
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05335408 -
Evaluation of Visual Function After Bilateral Implantation of EDOF IOLs
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05611073 -
Maximizing Visual Outcomes With Eyhance IOLs
|
||
Completed |
NCT04319497 -
Subjective and Objective Refraction in Pseudophakic Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05418153 -
Synergy Lens Outcomes Evaluation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06065072 -
Comparative Study of the Tomey OA-2000, Tomey CASIA2, and the LenStar LS900
|
||
Completed |
NCT02450799 -
Corrected VA With Long-Term Follow-Up After AcrySof® Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00428363 -
Effect of Optic Edge Design in a Silicone Intraocular Lens on Posterior Capsule Opacification
|
Phase 4 |