View clinical trials related to Proximal Humerus Fracture.
Filter by:Patients suffering from a proximal humerus fracture treated with plate osteosynthesis will receive either regular aftercare (physiotherapy) or aftercare assisted with continous passive motion (physiotherapy + CPM). Change in functional and patient-reported outcome (PROM) over time will be evaluated and compared.
The study is a monocentric, retrospective, non-randomized, non-controlled and consecutive series post-market study. The purpose of this study is to confirm safety, performance and clinical benefits of the XtraFix® Small External Fixation System (implants and instrumentation) when used to treat long bone fractures. The primary objective is the assessment of performance by analyzing fracture healing. The secondary objectives are the assessment of safety by recording and analyzing the incidence and frequency of complications and adverse events. Relation of the events to implant, instrumentation and/or procedure should be specified. Subjects' outcomes will also be assessed.
The study is a multicenter, retrospective and prospective, non-randomized, non-controlled and consecutive series post-market study. The purpose of this study is to collect long-term data confirming safety, performance and clinical benefits of the Anatomical Shoulder 2.0 Fracture System (Implants and Instrumentation) when used for fracture shoulder arthroplasty. The primary objective is the assessment of safety by analyzing implant survivorship. This will be established by recording the incidence and frequency of revisions, complications and adverse events. Relation of the events to implant, instrumentation and/or procedure should be specified. The secondary objective is the assessment of performance and clinical benefits by recording patient-reported clinical outcome measures (PROMs) as well as radiographic outcomes.
Proximal humerus fracture patient's upper limb complete function restoration mainly depends on patient rehabilitation exercises. One time teaching in clinic is usually not sufficient for patients to learn their rehabilitation exercises. This leads to delayed patient recovery and dis-satisfaction to treatment provided by health care providers. Our aim is that mobile health technology might facilitate patient to easily access health related teaching information other than routine care to support patient in their self-health care management thus leading to proximal humerus fracture patient treatment outcome improvement. Hypothesis: Mobile health technology positively improves clinical and functional outcomes of proximal humerus fracture using validated outcome scoring scales. Objectives: Primary objective: 1. To improve adult proximal humerus fracture patient's clinical and functional outcomes using validated outcome scoring scales resulting in timely recovery with the help of patient self-health care capacity using mobile health app. 2. To compare patient clinical and functional outcomes by validated scoring scales between using mobile health app versus standard care. Secondary Objective: To increase patient and doctor satisfaction rate in perspective with treatment provision usefully by digital technology application. Methods: Study design: Patient-centered, open labelled, parallel (1:1), pilot randomized controlled trial. Total 60 subjects required with 30 in each arm in 24-month duration. Study procedures: 1. Proximal humerus rehabilitation exercises video will be prepared after obtaining written informed consent from designated orthopaedic residents/surgeon. 2. Patients of 18 to 58 years of age with trauma associated proximal humerus fractures, who or their attendants are willing to participate. Patients who requires special care, patient not willing to exercise at home without physiotherapist support or participate in survey questionnaire and patients who does not have facility of classic blue tooth connectivity will be excluded. 3. Written informed consent will be administered the study subjects as per GCP guideline. 4. Each eligible patient will be randomized into intervention or control group. 1. Intervention group: Classic Blue tooth technology will be utilized for interoperable solution of teaching video information sharing from doctor to patient. The end users will be enrolled trauma associated proximal humerus fracture patients whether treated surgically or conservatively. 2. Control group: Routine care will be provided to control group and as per routine. 5. The patient will be followed at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months. Data will be collected on Case report form by assigned person. Clinical and functional outcomes will be assessed by assigned person using Quick DASH and Oxford shoulder score. 6. Researchers will be trained on data collection form prior to data collection. In case of lost to follow-up, patients will be contacted by telephone. 7. Patient satisfaction questionnaire: Administered to intervention group only about impact of digital technology application on their health improvement and care outcomes. 8. Doctor satisfaction questionnaire: To assess treating surgeon satisfaction rate for digital technology application impact on intervention group patients' care and outcomes. 9. The research study does not seem to have any potential health hazard. As per Food and Drug Administration and GCP recommendations for Serious/Adverse event (SAE/AE), any patient who experience SAE/AE, will receive good clinical care at earliest and all relevant reporting bodies will be notified. 10. Data management will be carried out at the Department of Surgery. Subject data confidentiality will be maintained. After study completion, data will be archived and retained for maximum years. Statistical Consideration: Quantitative variables will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation and qualitative variables as frequencies (percentages). The efficacy on the basis of clinical and functional outcome and the AEs/SAEs will be assessed by intention to treat analysis. For group comparisons of clinical and functional categorical outcomes, chi-square test or Fisher Exact will be applied. p-values of less than 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant with a confidence interval of 95%. Patient and doctor satisfaction scores will be analyzed using regression analysis. For Assessment of outcomes, repeated measure ANOVA and generalized estimating equation will be used. Multiple regression will be used to assess the association between multiple covariates.
The proximal humerus fracture (PHFs) is the third most common fracture type in the elderly, and represents 5% of the overall fractures. The incidence is increasing. The purpose of the project is to compare surgical and conservative management of two- part PHFs in light of radiological, economical and clinical outcome. Do the participants between 60 and 85 years of age with displaced two-part PHFs fare better or worse after surgery compared to non-operative treatment?
Fractures of the proximal humerus are increasingly frequent, with numbers tripling between the 1970s and the 2000s. Among these fractures, those involving the tuberosities and also the anatomic neck are a therapeutic challenge. For this type of fracture (Neer's four-part fracture) the degree of displacement of the fracture needs to be understood in order to provide suitable treatment and apprehend the risks in its evolution. There is indeed, in this type of fracture, a risk of humeral head ischaemia, which will carry considerable weight in the therapy adopted. The usual classifications, such as the AO or the Neer classification, have shown their limitations in terms of reproducibility and are not suitable for the prognostic assessment of these four-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus. The radiographic parameters described by Hertel in 2004, on the other hand, seem to be far more relevant to routine clinical practice. The use of the scanner to improve reproducibility of the classification of these proximal humerus fractures is still controversial. The scanner is the rule to guide therapeutic strategy for complex fractures, although the reproducibility of the different assessment criteria has never been studied.
This register study collects data of patients with proximal humerus and humerus shaft fractures to monitor the healing process by assessing shoulder function and quality of life according to the treatment method (operative or conservative management).
The primary objective is to determine if a difference exists in functional outcomes, as measured by the Constant score, when comparing nonoperative management and locking plate surgical fixation of low-energy displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population over a 2-year follow-up period. Secondary outcomes will include an assessment of the ASES score, the SF-36 quality of life score, complication rates, re-operation rates, radiographic time to union, radiographic malunion, hardware position and evidence of avascular necrosis or posttraumatic osteoarthritis .