View clinical trials related to Proximal Humeral Fracture.
Filter by:Our smartphones can recognize the pictures of our family, loved ones and friends. Face recognition software leverages artificial intelligence (AI), image recognition and other advanced technology to map, analyze and confirm the identity of a face. We humans do a poor job when classifying the injury related to a patient sustaining a proximal humeral fracture. In consequence, there is great heterogeneity in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Moreover, offering relevant information to patients regarding the risk of complications or fracture sequelae is challenging, given that the current series are based on obsolete classifications, and the published series bring together just over hundreds of patients analyzed. With these limitations, patients have few opportunities to participate in decision-making about their injury. The present project aim is to integrate new technologies for the prediction of relevant clinical results for the patients presenting a proximal humeral fracture. In brief, AI can help identify similar fracture patterns without human inference, while humans can feed the algorithm with variables of interest such as the functional outcomes and complications related to this particular type of fracture.
The goal of this clinical trial is to study whether surgery results in better functional outcomes than non-surgical treatment among patients aged 50-65 with a displaced proximal humerus fracture. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Does osteosynthesis result in better patient-reported functional outcomes compared to non-surgical treatment at 12 months follow-up? Aim is also to characterize the patient group aged 50-65 regarding fracture morphology, osteoporosis, and clinical frailty scale. The study compare operation with either plate or nail fixation to non-surgical treatment. Participants will: - Receive either surgical treatment or non-surgical treatment. - At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, the patient will answer two short questionnaires (Oxford Shoulder Score and Eq-5D-3L). The primary outcome will be Oxford Shoulder Score at 12 months. The secondary outcome will be OSS at 6 and 24 months and EQ-5D-3L score measured at the same time-points. Adverse events and conversion to surgery will be registered. OSS and EQ-5D-3L will be completed just before the 6 months visit.
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) techniques on functional status, pain, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in people with Proximal Humerus Fracture. There will be two groups, PNF and conservative treatment, and the program will consist of 6 weeks. Patients will randomly be assigned to the conservative treatment group and the PNF group. Patients in the conservative group will deliver shoulder muscle static stretching, active-assistive ROM exercises, scapular mobilization, posterior capsule stretching, and isometric strengthening for 3 weeks. Between 3-6 weeks these exercises will progress and shoulder muscles strengthening via Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and active ROM exercises will add to the program. Patients in the PNF group will deliver PNF stretching, active-assistive ROM exercises, PNF scapular patterns mobilization, posterior capsule stretching, and isometric strengthening for 3 weeks. Between 3-6 weeks PNF stretching and scapular mobilization exercises will progress and PNF strengthening and active ROM exercises will add to the program.
Statistical analysis for adult patients who were admitted to Assiut university hospital within one year with proximal femoral fractures. Protocol of management include lines of treatment , hospital stay and results