Contribution of the VERITON-CT Camera in Prostate Bone Radiostereotaxy

Prostatic Cancer Clinical Trial

— VERIOS  

Official title:

Contribution of 99mTc-HDP Whole-body SPECT/CT Imaging by VERITON-CT CZT Camera in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment of Bone Metastases of Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06439784
• Other study ID #: CHB23.06
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 15, 2024
• Est. completion date: June 15, 2027

Study information

• Verified date: May 2024
• Source: Centre Henri Becquerel
• Contact: Arnaud Dieudonne, PhD
• Phone: +33232082254
• Email: arnaud.dieudonne[@]chb-unicancer.fr
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Stereotactic radiotherapy enables bone metastases to be treated with highly precise irradiation beams, enabling small targets to be irradiated. Planning requires the use of cross-sectional imaging such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Bone scintigraphy with Tc99m-labelled biphosphonates (T1/2=6h) is indicated in the extension assessment of prostate cancers. Thanks to the advent of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) based on CZT detectors; whole-body SPECT is now compatible with clinical constraints. We propose to study the value of using whole-body SPECT for planning stereotactic radiotherapy of metastatic prostate cancer. This is a prospective, single-center, non-randomized study involving 30 patients. Patients will benefit from routine examinations (CT scan, MRI) including a bone SPECT/CT in treatment position performed on the VERITON-CT (Spectrum Dynamics, Haifa, Israel). Planning based on whole-body SPECT images will be carried out remotely from the patient's point of care. The examination will be interpreted by the nuclear physician, and planning will be based on the dosimetric CT scanner, as in standard management. Virtual replanning will be carried out at distance from treatment, incorporating SPECT imaging. Treatment plans with and without SPECT will be compared quantitatively and qualitatively. The feasibility of SPECT imaging in the treatment position will be assessed, enabling lesion location imaging and dosimetric scanning to be performed in a single examination. All therapeutic management and clinical follow-up will be carried out as part of routine care.

Description:

This is a prospective, single-center, non-randomized study. After a decision in a multidisciplinary consultation meeting, the patient will be offered to join the study. All therapeutic care and clinical follow-up is carried out as part of routine care.

Patients will benefit from routine examinations (CT scan, MRI) including a SPECT/CT scan of the bone in the treatment position. Three hours after injection of 9 MBq/kg of 99mTc-HDP, CT imaging followed by whole-body SPECT/CT will be performed on the VERITON-CT (Spectrum Dynamics, Haifa, Israel). In order to make the images in the treatment position, the molding of the BodyFIX (Elekta) compression system that is used to reposition the patient between sessions will be made on the examination bed of the VERITON. It is a mattress that stiffens due to air vacuums. It will be placed on an external radiotherapy tray as for the dosimetry scanner. If it is not possible to take the images under these conditions, the patient will benefit from an examination in the standard position.

The images will then be interpreted by a nuclear physician who will identify the targets and define the contours from the SPECT/CT data using the segmentation tools available in the Syngo.via visualization software (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). The images and contours will be anonymized in order to allow blind virtual replanning, at least 6 months before the planning. Non-anonymized images alone will be transmitted as a standard examination, but cannot be incorporated into the treatment plan, as is currently the case.

The patient will benefit from a standard dosimetry scanner for treatment planning. The molding of the mattress made during the SPECT/CT scan of the bone will be reused for the dosimetric scanner. The therapeutic procedure will then follow the local protocol and in line with national recommendations. Whole-body SPECT/CT imaging will then be performed at 3 and 6 months on the conventional examination bed. The targets identified during the reference whole-body SPECT/CT will be reused in order to measure the evolution of the SUV quantification.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: June 15, 2027
• Est. primary completion date: June 15, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age = 18 years,

• Good general health WHO = 1

• Informed and signed consent prior to any specific study procedure.

• Patient affiliated to the social security system

• Bone metastases from prostate cancer

• Indication for bone stereotactic radiotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

• Presence of active cancer in the previous three years

• Protected adults (under guardianship or curatorship)

• Unable to undergo medical monitoring for geographical, social or psychological reasons

• Unable to decubitus (orthopnea, etc.),

• Hypersensitivity to HDP or to one of the excipients of the radiopharmaceutical.

• History of radiotherapy of the volume to be treated by stereotaxy.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Prostatic Cancer
• Prostatic Neoplasms

Intervention

Other:
• whole body SPECT/CT
Patient will unergo a whole body SPECT/CT in treatment position

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Centre Henri Becquerel	Rouen

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Centre Henri Becquerel

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Equivalency of the two treatment plans in quantitative terms	Let m1 be the mean of a dosimetric index from whole-body 99mTc-HDP-SPECT/CT imaging and m2 the mean of the same dosimetric index from standard imaging, the null hypothesis will be "H0: m1 ? m2" and the alternative hypothesis "H1: m1 = m2". Thus, if we reject the null hypothesis at the risk of 5% then we will highlight the equivalence between m1 and m2. The statistical approach to set up such tests is called TOST and will require the definition of appropriate and relevant equivalence limits.	3 years
Secondary	Equivalency of the two treatment plans in qualitative terms	The consortium of radiation therapists will decide which treatment plan will be most beneficial for the patient. The proportion of patients whose SPECT/CT-based plan was chosen will be an indicator of the qualitative impact that this imaging can have on the treatment plan. This proportion will also be associated with its 95% confidence interval for accuracy.	3 years
Secondary	Feasibility of SPECT/CT imaging in treatment position	The number of patients who have been able to benefit from 99mTc-HDP-SPECT/CT imaging in a treatment position usable in dosimetric planning will be the main indicator of feasibility. Depending on the results of the feasibility of this imaging in the treatment position, we can deduce different conclusions: If the feasibility is demonstrated (25/30 patients) and the primary outcome does not show a difference between the two treatment plans, we will conclude that 99mTc-HDP-SPECT/CT imaging in the treatment position can be substituted for the standard simulation CT scanner. If feasibility is not demonstrated and the primary outcome does not show a difference between the two treatment plans, we will conclude that 99mTc-HDP-SPECT /CT imaging in the treatment position does not contribute to dosimetry planning.	day of SPECT/CT