View clinical trials related to Prone Position.
Filter by:Prone position ventilation was used 220 times in 44 out of 68 patients with severe COVID-19 induced ARDS treated with VV-ECMO. PPV treated patients did not benefit from PPV and the incidence of PPV related adverse events was high
The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the impact of online educational material versus a classic lecture on the confidence levels, knowledge and knowledge application of final-year nursing students. Participants will be asked to complete a baseline self-efficacy evaluation and a baseline knowledge test which were validated by the 11-member international expert panel previously established. After randomization, the control group will be asked to attend a classic 1-hour lecture at the nursing school about the topic of prone positioning and skin/tissue damage prevention. The experimental group will get access to the PRONEtect educational website containing short simulation videos and other learning materials. Three weeks later the participants will be asked to complete the self-efficacy evaluation and knowledge assessment again, additionally a knowledge application assessment. All the questionnaires will be administered via Qualtrics.
The investigator hypothesis is that early implementation of early, awake prone position for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen therapy will reduce the need for escalation of respiratory support. Escalation of respiratory support is defined as the need for respiratory support with HFNO, NIV or IV.
The burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is still on a rising course making a great stress on medical resources throughout the world. Although most of COVID-19 patients require non-invasive oxygenation and ventilation, rapid progression to hypoxemic respiratory failure and then acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can occur in some COVID19 patients due to prolonged or unaddressed hypoxia. Prone positioning is a common supportive ventilation strategy to improve oxygenation in critically ill patients with ARDS. Recent studies point out the potential benefits of using this strategy for non-intubated awake COVID 19 patients who are hypoxic. Despite several retrospective cohort studies have been conducted to identify impact of the prone positioning in awake non-intubated COVID-19 patients, experimental studies are very rare. This study therefore aims to evaluate the effects of self-prone positioning on oxygenation and physiological outcomes among awake-non intubated patients with COVID-19.
This study focuses on the evaluation of various factors repeatedly discussed in relation to the impaired sedation of intubated ventilated COVID-19 patients. The sedation response of >100 moderately to severely affected COVID-19 ARDS was evaluated. The sedation level was measured at the bedside using the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale and ventilator synchrony. The evaluation was performed according to the static evaluation plan with respect to age, storage therapy and organ failure.
Perioperative prone position may be associated with hemodynamic instability. The causes of instability have not yet been precisely elucidated. The aim of this study is to demonstrate physiological changes during prone positioning in healthy volunteers .
The SARS-Cov2 viral pandemic is responsible for a new infectious disease called COVID-19 (CoronaVIrus Disease), is a major health problem. Respiratory complications occur in 15 to 40%, the most serious is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The management of COVID-19 is essentially symptomatic with respiratory oxygen supplementation in mild forms to invasive mechanical ventilation in the most severe forms. Prone position (PP) reduced mortality in patients with ARDS in intensive care. Ding et al showed that PP and high flow oxygenation reduced the intubation in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. The investigators hypothesize that the use of PP in spontaneously ventilation patients under oxygen standard could decrease incidence of intubation or non-invasive ventilation or death compared to conventional positioning management in medical departments.
The purpose of this trial is to compare the effect of different fluid volume infusion on ocular parameters in patients undergoing spine surgery in prone position.
Beneficial effect of prone position in ARDS on mortality is not linked to increase in PF ratio. It is probably due to improvement in ventilation-perfusion ratio (V/Q). Volumetric capnography allows assessment of dead space and homogeneity of V/Q. All prone positionned patients will be included in the study with usual monitoring (i.e. respiratory system basic mechanics, volumetric capnography, blood gas samples). Epidemiologic and monitoring data will be collected during all prone position sessions.
NICOM® is a recently developed noninvasive cardiac output monitoring device, and indices derived from NICOM® such as SVV has been reported to predict fluid responsiveness in the previous studies. However, its usefulness in prone positioning has not been investigated. Thus, the aim of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the usefulness of stroke volume variation (SVV) derived from NICOM® to predict fluid responsiveness in prone patients undergoing spine surgery.