Clinical Trials Logo

Prolapse clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Prolapse.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00581334 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Start date: May 2007
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Robotic-assisted Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy is both a feasible and safe method for apical prolapse repair of the vagina.

NCT ID: NCT00576004 Completed - Clinical trials for Urinary Incontinence

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With or Without Concomitant Burch Colposuspension in Patients With Urinary Incontinence

Start date: January 2002
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the impact of Burch colposuspension (BC), as an anti-incontinence measure, in patients with urinary incontinence (UI) undergoing abdominal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair

NCT ID: NCT00566917 Completed - Vaginal Prolapse Clinical Trials

Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Start date: December 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic organ prolapse is characterized by a lack of pelvic floor support causing the pelvic organs and vaginal walls to protrude. For decades, suture repair techniques have been the primary choice of surgical treatment when indicated. Traditional surgical techniques are frequently associated with unsatisfying anatomical recurrence rates and it is plausible that inherently weak, or damaged, pelvic floor supportive tissues need to be reinforced by a permanent support to avoid the high rates of recurrences commonly described using traditional techniques. Over the years sporadic attempts have been made to introduce novel surgical techniques using a variety of biomaterials with varying success. Despite a lack of clinical safety data, or compelling clinical evidence demonstrating that it improves outcomes compared to traditional suture techniques, use of biomaterials in pelvic reconstructive surgery has become widespread in just a few years . It is likely that biomaterials need to be "anchored" in tissues not afflicted by the disease, in order to provide the intended pelvic floor support. This has given rise to transvaginal surgical techniques using a transobturator approach passing the mesh through the arcus tendineous fascia pelvis, or the sacrospinous ligaments through a transgluteal approach. Short term data from concluded and on-going safety assessments of these techniques has provided promising results and satisfying clinical outcomes. The aim of the present study is to compare anterior mesh repair (PROLIFT®) with traditional suture repair in a randomised trial.

NCT ID: NCT00557882 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse

VAMP-A
Start date: June 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to test the hypothesis that the addition of a standardized technique of interpositional synthetic polypropylene mesh placement improves the one-year outcome of vaginal reconstructive surgery for anterior prolapse compared to traditional vaginal reconstructive surgery without mesh.

NCT ID: NCT00551993 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse

Start date: September 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to conduct a trial of robotic assisted versus traditional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of patients with vaginal prolapse.

NCT ID: NCT00535301 Completed - Clinical trials for Urinary Incontinence

Outcomes of Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Graft Reinforced Anterior Prolapse Repair

Start date: January 2005
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is determine whether grafted anterior vaginal prolapse repair is more effective and associated with less complications than prolapse repair with suture.

NCT ID: NCT00521066 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Start date: June 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to is to evaluate the success of the GYNECARE PROSIMA* system in women with symptoms for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) requiring surgical correction of POP. (*TRADEMARK)

NCT ID: NCT00476892 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Prolapse

POPPY
Start date: June 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in the management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

NCT ID: NCT00475540 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse

VAMP
Start date: January 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to test the hypothesis that the addition of a standardized technique of interpositional synthetic polypropylene mesh placement improves the one-year outcome of vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse compared to traditional vaginal reconstructive surgery without mesh.

NCT ID: NCT00460434 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Mid Urethral Sling Trial

OPUS
Start date: May 2007
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic organ prolapse is common among women with a prevalence that has been estimated to be as high as 30%. Prolapse may be corrected by surgery using either a vaginal or abdominal incision. Some women develop stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after surgery. A prior randomized trial has shown that use of a Burch sling at the time of an abdominal sacrocolpopexy decreases the risk of urinary incontinence; however, the benefit of adding an anti incontinence procedure to prevent SUI at the time of prolapse surgery performed via a vaginal approach is unclear. Thus, the objective of the Outcomes following vaginal Prolapse repair and mid Urethral Sling (OPUS) trial is to determine whether prophylactic treatment with Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT)® at the time of prolapse surgery done via a vaginal approach is effective in preventing urinary incontinence.