Clinical Trials Logo

Prolapse clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Prolapse.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01618994 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Validation Study for Robotic Surgery Simulator

Start date: April 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

A study to determine whether completing a rigorous simulation protocol could provide novice robotic surgeons with actual advanced surgical skills in an operating room setting.

NCT ID: NCT01618292 Completed - Clinical trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Cohort Study of Bowel Function Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Start date: January 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Compare changes in bowel function before, 6 months and one year after Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Compare objective anatomic outcomes before, 6 months and one year after Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.

NCT ID: NCT01614587 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Do Patients With Early Post Operative Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Have a Genetic Predisposition?

Start date: March 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The objective is to explore the genetic predisposition to early pelvic organ prolapse after adequate surgical repair by exploring the association between pelvic organ prolapse recurrences and certain polymorphisms.

NCT ID: NCT01612637 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Can Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Reduce my Prolapse

Start date: August 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Purpose The aim of this study is to examine if a structured pelvic floor muscle training combined with lifestyle advice with can improve pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptoms more than structured lifestyle advice programme alone. Background Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition among adult women and almost one in ten women experience symptoms caused by POP. The key symptom of POP is seeing or feeling a bulge in the vaginal opening but POP often gives other symptoms, such as pain, difficulty emptying the bladder or the bowel, incontinence and sexual problems such as dyspareunia. A majority of women with POP will be offered reconstructive surgery but the risk of reoperations is substantial and surgery may cause new symptoms. In one out of four women surgery does not relieve symptoms and the women have been exposed to unnecessary risk of complications. It is therefore important to evaluate the effect of conservative treatments for POP. New studies have shown that pelvic floor muscle training offered in combination with lifestyle advice has a significant on POP symptoms and objective measures of POP compared to a lifestyle advice leaflet alone. No studies have compared the effect of a combined pelvic floor muscle training and lifestyle advice programme with a structured programme of lifestyle advice and hypothetically the structured lifestyle advice programme could have a substantial effect on its own. Our hypothesis is that the pelvic floor muscle training is a vital component of a conservative treatment for POP. Methods In this single-blind randomised controlled study women with POP will randomised to either a programme of structured pelvic floor muscle training combined with lifestyle advice or a structured lifestyle advice programme alone. Both groups will receive the same lifestyle advices through six (separate) lectures within 12 weeks. The training group will be examined and individually instructed in pelvic floor muscle training before the intervention starts and they will, in continuation with their lifestyle lectures, perform pelvic floor muscle training as group training

NCT ID: NCT01611285 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Uphold Versus Robotic Surgery for Pelvic Prolapse Repair: A Decision Analytic Approach

Start date: November 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Within the general objective of investigating optimal medical techniques for pelvic prolapse repair, this study proposes to: (1) test the hypothesis that the UPHOLD procedure is more cost effective than robotic surgery for pelvic prolapse repair (2)using formal decision analysis as the comparative strategy

NCT ID: NCT01590576 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Population-based Estimates of Medical Comorbidities in Women With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms or Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Start date: November 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to investigate the comorbidities of lower urinary tract symptoms or pelvic organ prolapse in a nationwide population-based data in Taiwan during the study period of 2001-2010, a total of 10 years.

NCT ID: NCT01560377 Completed - Rectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Perfusion Assessment in Laparoscopic Left Anterior Resection

PILLAR II
Start date: May 2012
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that NIR fluorescence angiography using the PINPOINT Endoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System ("PINPOINT System" or "PINPOINT") can assess viability of colon tissue during laparoscopic left colectomy. This information will provide the surgeon with clinically relevant information in assessing whether or not the tissue has adequate blood supply in the lower section of the colon prior to a colectomy.

NCT ID: NCT01559168 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Uphold Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Uterine-predominant Prolapse

Start date: October 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the UpholdTM LITE mesh over a 12 month follow up period, using a composite outcome including a good anatomical correction for both anterior and apical compartments (stage 0 or 1), no prolapse (bulge) symptoms (answer "no" at question 3 of the PFDI-20) and no reintervention for recurrent prolapse of the anterior or apical compartment.

NCT ID: NCT01551992 Completed - Prolapse Clinical Trials

Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ Srs) During Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Randomized Controlled Trial (Quill Lsc)

QUILL-LSC
Start date: November 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

1.0 STUDY OBJECTIVE 1.1 PRIMARY OBJECTIVE - To compare two methods of polypropylene mesh attachment during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC): running technique using self-anchoring 1 barbed delayed absorbable suture (Quill™ SRS, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vancouver, Canada) versus interrupted technique using 0 non-barbed delayed absorbable suture (PDS II™, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). 1.2 SECONDARY OBJECTIVE - To compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy anatomic failure rates at 6 months post-operative follow-up using self-anchoring 1 barbed delayed absorbable suture (Quill™ SRS, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vancouver, Canada) versus 0 non-barbed delayed absorbable suture (PDS II™, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). The investigators will also assess mesh erosion rates, costs, and surgeon satisfaction rates. 2.0 HYPOTHESIS 2.1 Primary: 2.1.a. Attachment of mesh using the running technique with self-anchoring 1 barbed delayed absorbable suture (Quill™ SRS, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vancouver, Canada) will be faster than the standard fixation interrupted technique using 0 non-barbed delayed absorbable suture (PDS II™, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). 2.2 Secondary: 2.2.a. Attachment of mesh using the running technique with self-anchoring 1 barbed delayed absorbable suture (Quill™ SRS, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vancouver, Canada) will be less costly than the standard fixation interrupted technique using 0 non-barbed delayed absorbable suture (PDS II™, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). 2.2.b. Failure rates and mesh erosion rates for each technique will be equally low. 2.2.c. Surgeons will prefer the barbed running technique over the interrupted technique based on subjective surgeon satisfaction questionnaires.

NCT ID: NCT01548989 Completed - Clinical trials for Urinary Incontinence

Validation of a New Sexuality Questionnaire for Patients With Urinary Incontinence or Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Start date: April 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The main objective of this study is to perform the linguistic validation of a new french questionnaire in a population of sexually active (or not) patients who have undergone surgery (or not) for stress urinary incontinence or genital prolapse.