Prolapse; Female Clinical Trial
Official title:
Understanding Factors Which Affect Willingness to Self-manage a Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Mixed Methods Study Aiming to Improve Access to Pessary Self-management.
NCT number | NCT05750615 |
Other study ID # | B01328 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | August 25, 2022 |
Est. completion date | March 2024 |
Pessary self-management is defined as the patient's ability to remove and reinsert their pessary themselves at home. Previous research has suggested that some women may prefer being able to remove and reinsert their pessary as they wish rather than wait for clinic appointments. At the moment, not enough is known about pessary self-management, particularly what makes someone more or less likely to try pessary self-management. The investigators would like to understand this better to try to help women overcome barriers they might face. This study aims to collect data via both questionnaires and interviews to explore willingness to self-manage a pessary. Using findings from the questionnaires and interviews, a group of women who use pessaries and healthcare professionals who provide pessary care will work together to develop a better way to support women to feel able and willing to manage their pessary in future.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 132 |
Est. completion date | March 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Quantitative phase inclusion criteria - Willing and able to give implied consent by completion of the questionnaire - Female - Over the age of 18 years - Have retained a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse for a minimum of two weeks - Able to speak and understand English - Use a ring, shaatz, cube or inflatable pessary Qualitative phase inclusion criteria - Willing and able to give informed consent - Female - Over the age of 18 years - Have retained a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse for a minimum of two weeks - Speak English or, for those whose first or preferred language is a language other than English, speak a language there is an available interpreter for Intervention development phase inclusion criteria Pessary using women - Willing and able to give informed consent - Female - Over the age of 18 years - Have retained a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse for a minimum of two weeks - Speak English Pessary practitioners - Willing and able to give informed consent - Provide regular pessary care as part of clinical role (defined as insertion or removal of a woman's pessary on a minimum of a monthly basis) - Speak English Pilot phase inclusion criteria - Willing and able to give informed consent, review the intervention and provide written and/or verbal feedback. - Female - Over the age of 18 years - Have retained a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse for a minimum of two weeks - Speak English - Have no previous experience self-managing a pessary (defined as never having removed or inserted their pessary, or received any pessary self-management teaching or support from a healthcare professional) Exclusion Criteria: Quantitative phase exclusion criteria - Lacking capacity to give implied consent by completion of the questionnaire - Has a first or preferred language that is not English - Use a shelf, gell-horn or donut pessary Qualitative phase exclusion criteria - Lacking capacity to give informed consent - First or preferred language that is not English or a language there is an available interpreter for Intervention development phase exclusion criteria Pessary using women - Lacking capacity to give informed consent - Does not speak English Pessary practitioners - Lacking capacity to give informed consent - Does not speak English - Does not provide pessary care at a minimum of a monthly basis Intervention pilot exclusion criteria - Lacking capacity to give informed consent, review the intervention and provide written and/or verbal feedback. - Does not speak English - Have prior experience self-managing a pessary (defined as previously removing or inserting their pessary, or receiving any pessary self-management teaching or support from a healthcare professional) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | Manchester |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust |
United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Willingness to self-manage a pessary | Women will be asked whether they are willing or not to self-manage a pessary for prolapse. This will be a binary yes, no or not sure answer. | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Age | Full years since birth | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Pessary | Type and size of pessary in situ | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Length of pessary management | Total months pessary used for | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Comorbidities | Free text data for participant to report diagnosed health conditionns | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Self-management experience | The woman will be asked whether she has previously removed or inserted her pessary | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Self-management status | The woman will be asked whether she is currently self-managing her pessary (defined as removing and inserting it independently in between clinic appointments) | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Ethnicity | Ethnic groups in accordance with UK government agreed list of ethnicities | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Post code | Post code at home address to determine deprivation of home address in accordance with UK government index of deprivation | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Education status | Women will be asked to report their highest level of education | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) | |
Secondary | Female genital self-image score (FGSIS) | Women will also be asked to complete the Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS-4), a reliable and validated 4-item questionnaire which measures women's attitude and beliefs about their genitals (Herbenick and Reece, 2010). Scores in the FGSIS-4 range between 4-16, with a mean score of 12 in a nationally representative population of over 2000 American women (Herbenick et al., 2011). Herbenick et al. (2011) have not determined a binary score for high and low FGSIS, however for the purpose of this study, a score of eight or less will indicate low FGSI, whereas more than eight will indicate high FGSI. To score eight or less, a participant must disagree with all four statements describing genital self-image therefore this is deemed to accurately represent FGSIS-4. | Through study completion, an average of 1 appointment (1 day) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04880239 -
REDUCE Trial- Reducing Prolapse Recurrence
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05978414 -
Functional Links Between the Temporomandibular Joint and the Pelvis in Gynecology
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05836844 -
Pragmatic Evaluation of Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment of Apical Prolapse in Women
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06404931 -
Transvaginal Human Acellular Dermal Matrix for Prolapse Treatment
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06128291 -
Concomitant Posterior Colporrhaphy on Bowel Functions in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
|
||
Completed |
NCT06352112 -
Effects of the Hypopressive Exercises in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04440475 -
Tap Block vs Conventional Pain Medication for Patients Undergoing Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05760794 -
Barbed-suture Efficiency Study for Sacrocolpopexy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03878056 -
Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05633901 -
Impact of Preop Video on Patient Anxiety
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04491617 -
STandard Versus No Opioid Prescription After Prolapse and Anti-INcontinence Surgery Trial
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06159777 -
Pre-operative Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Minimally Invasive Urogynecologic Surgery
|
Phase 4 |