Clinical Trials Logo

Procedure Time clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Procedure Time.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04473456 Completed - Procedure Time Clinical Trials

Combined Simultaneous EGD-colonoscopy Trial (CoSi Endoscopy)

Start date: June 13, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The COVID -19 pandemic has reduced endoscopy services to an average of 83% producing a significant economic impact on endoscopy units worldwide. Endoscopy as an aerosol-generating procedure requires endoscopy units to allow 12 cycles of air exchange per hour, equivalent to 20 minutes, between patients, to reduce medical risk exposure. Planning strategies to facilitate economic reactivation of endoscopy services in a responsible manner, maintaining adequate security measures for both patients and healthcare personnel is currently a major challenge. Serial endoscopic interventions as esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy are commonly performed during the same sedation time. Estimated times for quality inspection in the upper digestive tract and the colon, are 7 and 6 minutes, respectively. In addition, time to reach the cecum and to set up the following procedure increase not only procedure time but SARS-CoV-2 exposure to healthcare personnel. Performing these two procedures simultaneously by two endoscopists would considerably reduce procedure time while increasing the number of patients evaluated in one day, especially in the period of service reactivation. There are no studies comparing simultaneous EGD and colonoscopy procedures and, serial procedures. This study aims to determine differences in procedures times between simultaneous EGD-colonoscopy and conventional serial EGD-colonoscopy as an alternative to improve the number of procedures/hour/unit during the COVID-19 era.

NCT ID: NCT02565875 Not yet recruiting - Communication Clinical Trials

Standardizing Language in Laparoscopic Surgery

SLL
Start date: March 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Obstetrics and Gynecology residents, fellows and attending physicians will be randomized to view one of two educational presentations of equal duration. The "intervention" presentation will demonstrate the use of a standardized language for effective communication of laparoscopy commands. Both groups will be asked to perform a simulated laparoscopic task. Participants will be timed and use of the standardized language will be tracked and tabulated. The primary outcome of interest is whether the use of standard commands during a simulated laparoscopic task is associated with sooner completion of the task. This may translate into improved efficiency in the operating room.