Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis Clinical Trial
Official title:
An Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch for the Treatment of Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis or Excessive Axillary Sweating
Verified date | August 2023 |
Source | Candesant Biomedical, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The Sahara Study is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch for use in subjects with excessive axillary sweating, or primary focal axillary hyperhidrosis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 120 |
Est. completion date | December 20, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | July 6, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 22 Years and older |
Eligibility | Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Signed written informed consent 2. At least 22 years old at the time of consent. 3. Female or male, who experiences excessive sweating or has been diagnosed with primary axillary focal hyperhidrosis and is in otherwise good general health 4. GSP >50mg/5min in each axilla 5. Reports a score of HDSS score of 3 or 4 Key Exclusion Criteria: 1. Active skin disease, irritation, or abrasions at either axilla based 2. Subject's medical history is indicative of secondary or diffuse hyperhidrosis and/or subject has a diagnosis of secondary or diffuse hyperhidrosis 3. GSP exceeds 300 mg/5min in either axilla |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Skincare Physicians | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Research Your Health | Dallas | Texas |
United States | CA Dermatology & Clinical Research Inst | Encinitas | California |
United States | Center for Dermatology Clinical Research | Fremont | California |
United States | Minnesota Clinical Study Center | Fridley | Minnesota |
United States | Dermatology Consulting Services, Zoe Draelos, MD | High Point | North Carolina |
United States | Pariser Derm / Virginia Clinical Research | Norfolk | Virginia |
United States | AE Derm | Rockville | Maryland |
United States | Grekin Skin Institute | Warren | Michigan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Candesant Biomedical, Inc. |
United States,
Doolittle J, Walker P, Mills T, Thurston J. Hyperhidrosis: an update on prevalence and severity in the United States. Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Dec;308(10):743-749. doi: 10.1007/s00403-016-1697-9. Epub 2016 Oct 15. — View Citation
Glaser DA, Coleman WP 3rd, Fan LK, Kaminer MS, Kilmer SL, Nossa R, Smith SR, O'Shaughnessy KF. A randomized, blinded clinical evaluation of a novel microwave device for treating axillary hyperhidrosis: the dermatologic reduction in underarm perspiration study. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2):185-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02250.x. Epub 2012 Jan 30. — View Citation
Glaser DA, Hebert A, Pieretti L, Pariser D. Understanding Patient Experience With Hyperhidrosis: A National Survey of 1,985 Patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Apr 1;17(4):392-396. — View Citation
Hamm H. Impact of hyperhidrosis on quality of life and its assessment. Dermatol Clin. 2014 Oct;32(4):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 16. — View Citation
Hornberger J, Grimes K, Naumann M, Glaser DA, Lowe NJ, Naver H, Ahn S, Stolman LP; Multi-Specialty Working Group on the Recognition, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis. Recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of primary focal hyperhidrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Aug;51(2):274-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.12.029. No abstract available. — View Citation
Stander M, Wallis LA. The emergency management and treatment of severe burns. Emerg Med Int. 2011;2011:161375. doi: 10.1155/2011/161375. Epub 2011 Sep 4. — View Citation
Strutton DR, Kowalski JW, Glaser DA, Stang PE. US prevalence of hyperhidrosis and impact on individuals with axillary hyperhidrosis: results from a national survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Aug;51(2):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.12.040. — View Citation
Wade R, Rice S, Llewellyn A, Moloney E, Jones-Diette J, Stoniute J, Wright K, Layton AM, Levell NJ, Stansby G, Craig D, Woolacott N. Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(80):1-280. doi: 10.3310/hta21800. — View Citation
Wilke K, Martin A, Terstegen L, Biel SS. A short history of sweat gland biology. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2007 Jun;29(3):169-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2494.2007.00387.x. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Safety of the N-SWEAT Patch | Number of patients with Adverse Events and/or Skin reactions following patch treatment | 4 weeks | |
Primary | Effectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch to Change Subjects From an HDSS 3 or 4 at Baseline to HDSS 1 or 2 at 4 Weeks | Achievement of Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score of 1 or 2 at 4 weeks.
HDSS is a disease-specific diagnostic tool that provides a qualitative measure of the severity of the patient's condition based on how it affects daily activities. HDSS 3 or 4 are generally considered to have a clinically significant case and those with HDSS 1 or 2 are considered to have mild to no evidence of hyperhidrosis. SCALE: 1 - My sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2- My sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3- My sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4- My sweating is intolerable and and always interferes with my daily activities |
4 weeks | |
Secondary | Mean Change in the Quality of Life. Assessed by Evaluating How Much Sweat Bothers or Impacts the Daily Life of Patients (a Higher Score Means More Bother and More Impact) | Two Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments were conducted as part of this endpoint. The Level of Bother: Subjects were asked how much their sweat bothered them on a Scale of 1 (not at all bothered by sweating) to 5 (extremely bothered by sweating). The Impact of Sweat on Daily Activities: Subjects were asked how much their sweating impacts their daily activities on a scale of 1 (not at all impacted) to 5 (extremely impacted).
The mean improvement of each of these was calculated by comparing the mean baseline level to the mean level at 4 weeks. The mean change in the level of improvement was analyzed for significance. A larger decrease in these levels, i.e. less bother and less impact, (indicated by a larger negative number) will show the most improvement in QoL. |
4 weeks | |
Secondary | Percentage of Patients With a Mean Change in Gravimetric Sweat Production (GSP) Indicating That Sweating After Treatment is Cut in Half From Pre-treatment Sweat | Gravimetric Sweat Production (GSP) measures the amount of sweat that is produced in a 5-minute period. The percentage of treated subjects with at least a 50% reduction in mean GSP (mean of both axilla) from baseline to 4 weeks was analyzed for this endpoint. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Percentage of Patients With a 2-point Change in HDSS to Show That Sweat is Less Clinically Significant After Treatment | Patients with a 2-point decrease in HDSS indicate improvement in sweating.
HDSS is a disease-specific diagnostic tool that provides a qualitative measure of the severity of the patient's condition based on how it affects daily activities. HDSS 3 or 4 are generally considered to have a clinically significant case and those with HDSS 1 or 2 are considered to have mild to no evidence of hyperhidrosis. SCALE: 1 - My sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2- My sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3- My sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4- My sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities |
4-weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03627468 -
A Safety Study of BBI-4000 Gel in Patients With Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03658616 -
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Topical Administration of 1% Glycopyrronium Bromide (GPB) in Patients With Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis and the Assessment of Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Topical Administration of 1% GPB Cream in Patients With Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis.
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02286765 -
Ulthera® System for Treating Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03037788 -
Investigation of Ascending Concentrations of Glycopyrronium Bromide (GPB) in a Topical Formulation in Subjects With Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01722461 -
A Study of the Ulthera® System for the Treatment of Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05863104 -
Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, Systemic Exposure and Efficacy of GPB Cream in Adolescents With Severe Primary Hyperhidrosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02823340 -
Fractionated Microneedle Radiofrequency for Treatment of Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04159610 -
Assessment of Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of 1% GPB Cream Versus Qbrexza® (Glycopyrronium) Cloth 2.4% Under Maximum-Use Conditions in Subjects With Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01799824 -
Clinical Trial to Evaluate ANT-1403 in the Treatment of Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03785587 -
A Safety Study of BBI-4000 Gel in Pediatric Patients With Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03054480 -
Fractional Micro-Needle Radiofrequency and I Botulinum Toxin A for Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis
|
N/A |