Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by System Usability Scale (SUS) |
Aim 1a: The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item Likert scale (5-item ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree) which will allow the participants (Veterans) to give their subjective assessment of the Smart watch as part of the CMAP system. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model |
Year 1-2: Change from baseline to second and third focus group |
|
Primary |
Usability as measured by User Experience Questionaire (UEQ) |
Aim 1a: The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is a 26 -item semantic differential arranged on six scales (attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and, novelty) which will measure the participant's (Veterans) impression of the of their experience with the Smart watch as part of the CMAP system. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model. |
Year 1-2: Change from baseline to second and third focus group |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by System Usability Scale (SUS) |
Aim 1b:The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item Likert scale (5-item ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree) which will allow the participants (clinicians) to give their subjective assessment of the newly developed educational formats in the CMAP system. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model |
Year 1-2: Change from baseline to second and third focus group |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by User Experience Questionaire (UEQ) |
Aim 1b:The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is a 26 -item semantic differential arranged on six scales (attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and, novelty) which will measure the participants' (clinicians) impression of the of their experience with the newly developed educational formats of the CMAP system. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model. |
Year 1-2: Change from baseline to second and third focus group |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by System Usability Scale (SUS) |
Aim 2: The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item Likert scale (5-item ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree) which will allow the participants (clinicians) to give their subjective assessment of the educational formats in the CMAP system after using it for Veterans' acute rehabilitation. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model |
Year 2-3: compare final focus group score to after using in rehabilitation |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by User Experience Questionaire (UEQ) |
Aim 2: The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is a 26 -item semantic differential arranged on six scales (attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and, novelty) which will measure the participants' (clinicians) impression of the of their experience with the CMAP educational formats after using it for Veterans' acute rehabilitation. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model. |
Year 2-3: compare final focus group score to after using in rehabilitation |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by System Usability Scale (SUS) |
Aim 2: The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item Likert scale (5-item ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree) which will allow the participants (Veterans) to give their subjective assessment of the CMAP system after using it during their acute rehabilitation. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model |
Year 2-3: compare final focus group score to after using in rehabilitation |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by User Experience Questionaire (UEQ) |
Aim 2: The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is a 26 -item semantic differential arranged on six scales (attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and, novelty) which will measure the participants' (Veterans) impression of the of their experience with the CMAP system after using it during Veterans' during their acute rehabilitation. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model. |
Year 2-3: compare final focus group score to after using in rehabilitation |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by System Usability Scale (SUS) |
Aim 3: The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item Likert scale (5-item ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree) which will allow the participants (clinicians) to give their subjective assessment of the educational formats in the CMAP system after using it for Veterans' in the outpatient and community-based settings . Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model. |
Year 4: compare initial and final use in the out patient and home setting |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by User Experience Questionaire (UEQ) |
Aim 3:The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is a 26 -item semantic differential arranged on six scales (attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and, novelty) which will measure the participants' (clinicians) impression of the of their experience with the CMAP educational formats at the start of intervention and after using the CMAP system in the outpatient and community-based settings. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model. |
Year 4: compare initial and final use in the home setting |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by System Usability Scale (SUS) |
Aim 3: The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item Likert scale (5-item ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree) which will allow the participants (Veterans) to give their subjective assessment of the CMAP system after using it in the outpatient and community-based settings. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model. |
Year 4: compare initial and final use in the home setting |
|
Primary |
Change in Usability as measured by User Experience Questionaire (UEQ) |
Aim 3:The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is a 26 -item semantic differential arranged on six scales (attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and, novelty) which will measure the participants' (Veterans) impression of the of their experience with the CMAP system at the start of intervention and after using the CMAP system in the outpatient and community-based settings . Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model. |
Year 4: compare initial and final use in the home setting |
|
Secondary |
Change in Self-Efficacy as measured by Skin Care Belief Scale |
Aim 2: The Skin Care Belief Scale (King 2012) self efficacy portion (21-items) will be used to measure the participants' (Veterans) perception of pressure injury risk and beliefs about performance of weight shifts. Baseline measure pre-instruction using the CMAP and post-instruction and use of the CMAP system. The responses are scaled: 1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model |
Year 2-3: Pre post use of the CMAP system |
|
Secondary |
Change in Self-Efficacy as measured by customized scale |
Aim 2: This self-efficacy measures clinician confidence in delivering pressure injury prevention education, specifically around instruction of how to perform weight shifts using the CMAP system during Veterans' acute rehabilitation. Baseline measure pre-instruction using the CMAP and post-instruction and use of the CMAP system. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model |
Year 2-3: Pre post use of the CMAP system |
|
Secondary |
Change in Self-Efficacy as measured by Skin Care Belief Scale |
Aim 3: The Skin Care Belief Scale (King 2012) self efficacy portion (21-items) will be used to measure the participants' (Veterans) perception of pressure injury risk and beliefs about performance of weight shifts. Baseline measure pre-instruction using the CMAP and post-use of the CMAP system. The responses are scaled: 1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model |
Year 4: Pre post use of the CMAP system |
|
Secondary |
Change in Self-Efficacy as measured by customized scale |
Aim 3: This self-efficacy measures clinician confidence in delivering pressure injury prevention education, specifically around instruction of how to perform weight shifts using the CMAP system during Veterans' acute rehabilitation. Baseline measure pre-instruction using the CMAP and post-use of the CMAP system in the outpatient and home settings. Analysis will use Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model |
Year 4: Pre post use of the CMAP system |
|
Secondary |
Weight Shift bout comparisons |
Aim 3: Comparing Veteran weight shift activity (measured by actigraphy) pre and post use of CMAP system in the outpatient and community-based settings. |
Year 4 |
|