View clinical trials related to Pressure Ulcer.
Filter by:A monocentric cluster-crossover design has been used in this study to test the effectiveness of a 3-in-1 perineal care washcloth versus standard of care (e.g., water and pH neutral soap) to prevent and treat pressure ulcers in ICUs.
The objective of this study is to determine if silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings applied to the sacrum, heels and greater trochanter in addition to standard prevention reduce pressure ulcer incidence category II, III, IV, Unstageable and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone, in at risk hospitalised patients. In particular, this trial extends previous trial results obtained in ICU setting. Therefore, only a maximum of 25% of patients will be recruited from ICU settings. The hypothesis is: 'The use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy for pressure ulcer prevention is more effective in reducing pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) incidence rate on sacrum, heels and greater trochanter, compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone.' The null hypothesis is: 'The use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy for pressure ulcer prevention is not more effective in reducing pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, Unstageable, and Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) incidence rate on sacrum, heels and greater trochanter, compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention alone.
The enrolled children would be randomized to one of the groups 'study group' or 'Honey dressing group' or 'Group I' (honey dressing containing Active Leptospermum Honey also known as Manuka honey would be used), changed every alternate day for a maximum period of upto 8 weeks (in cases of stage IV ulcers) or till healthy granulation tissue appears, whichever is earlier and 'control group' or 'Standard treatment group ' or 'Group 2' (paraffin gauze is applied after application of povidone iodine). Randomization will be performed as per protocol. Primary outcome will be reduction in time to healing of any stage of pressure ulcer and secondary outcomes will be treatment failure and new onset infection of ulcer.
Pressure injuries are a serious health care problem and affect millions of people. Most pressure injuries are avoidable with the application of best practices and with the use of appropriate technology. Support surfaces are a crucial component of any comprehensive prevention strategy. Decades of research have produced moderate and low levels of evidence upon which to base clinical decisions concerning how and when to apply support surfaces for prevention. This knowledge has been periodically assessed and assembled into clinical practice guidelines. There is good evidence that the combined group of active and reactive support surfaces is effective in preventing pressure injuries and that high-specification reactive foam surfaces are effective in preventing pressure injuries. But there is insufficient evidence that low air loss surfaces are more or less effective than other types of surfaces. Yet, low air loss surfaces are used for more than 17% of patients in acute care at high risk of developing pressure injuries. The study is designed to determine if and when low air loss is effective in preventing pressure injuries, and what level of heat and moisture control performance is necessary for prevention effectiveness. The primary aim of the project is to compare the effectiveness of reactive support surfaces with low air loss to reactive support surfaces without low air loss in preventing pressure injuries for people with moisture risk factors in acute care. Support surfaces are currently marketed and identified by practitioners based on device features (e.g., low air loss, air fluidization, alternating pressure), categories (powered, non-powered, reactive, and active) and components (e.g., foam, gel, fluid). The critical performance characteristics of low air loss systems are moisture, humidity and temperature management. Preliminary work has revealed that these characteristics vary widely among different low air loss products. A secondary aim of the proposed study is to explore associations between support surface performance characteristics and pressure injury outcomes to identify which low air loss performance characteristics and what level of those performance characteristics are necessary for the technology to be effective. Successful completion of this project will fill a critical gap in evidence regarding the effectiveness of support surfaces with low air loss, and could influence a shift in the way support surfaces are characterized away from the current feature-based paradigm toward a more clinically relevant and generalizable performance-based paradigm.
The purpose of this study is to test if the newly-developed Dabir alternating pressure (AP) overlay could be beneficial to preventing skin damage during daily activities, such as lying in bed. Specifically, the study is being done to test if the Dabir AP overlay could be used to increase skin tolerance when lying in bed for an extended period of time (40 minutes), including reducing pressure and increasing skin blood flow (amount of blood supply to oxygen and nutrients to skin) as compared to regular operation room (OR) overlay. A total of 20 participants with spinal cord injury will be recruited. Subjects will undergo study procedures including: AP and Control protocols. Skin blood flow and interface pressure will be collected non-invasively (from outside the body) during both protocols. During AP protocols, subject will be asked to lie on side (10 min), on back on AP overlay (40 min), on side (30 min), on back on OR overlay (40 min), and on side (10 min). During Control protocol, subject will be asked to lie on side (10 min), on back on OR overlay (40 min), and on side (10 min). Subject will then proceed to vascular control measures, including: non-invasive skin blood flow and tissue oxygen measurements with mild heating and electrical stimulation. Findings from this study will help us understand the effectiveness of the AP overlay on skin blood flow response during prolonged lying in bed.
The RESPOND Registry is an observational study to assess the impact of PuraPly™ AM on the management of wounds in real world clinical settings; no experimental intervention is involved.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate incidence of complete epithelialization in stage 3 & 4 pressure ulcers using ACell products.
All patients with a significant deficiency of skin sensitivity and reduced mobility are potentially at risk of Pressure Ulcers (PUs), in particular the persons affected by Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), also due to their frequent alteration or loss of subcutaneous skin sensitivity. Pressure sores are one of the most common and fearful complications in SCI, with a severe impact on quality of life and on care health costs. They are often the cause of lengthening the time of hospitalization, slowing down clinical and rehabilitation programs and re-hospitalization. PUs, when arisen, heal slowly and, despite the protracted conservative medical therapies, sometimes they do not come to complete healing. Sometimes plastic surgery is needed, although even after it recurrence rates remain high. Further treatments have been proposed in addition to the usual medication, however they are characterized by a certain degree of invasiveness and are often conditioned by the availability of specific and sometimes expensive equipment, as well as by the presence of highly qualified personnel. In general, there is also a lack of good quality clinical trials for assessing their effectiveness and safety and they are often not decisive, especially for severe and recalcitrant ulcers. Among alternative techniques for the healing of skin ulcers in general, the adhesive elastic bandage, also known as "kinesio taping" and already recognized for the treatment of edema, hematoma and scarring, has been proposed. However, specific protocols and published studies are not available for PUs. The Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, that hosts the largest Spinal Unit in Italy, pays great attention to the prevention and treatment of PUs in both acute and chronic patients. The rationale for the taping positioning around PUs investigated in this study is to improve lymphatic drainage and reactivation of the superficial bloodstream by increasing interstitial spaces and reducing skin and subcutaneous compression, notoriously compromised in the areas of onset of pressure sores. The total shortage in the literature and in user manuals of taping protocols for PUs supports this preliminary, exploratory, descriptive and uncontrolled pilot study with the primary aim of verifying the safety of a taping treatment for medium/severe grade PUs, "add-on" to the usual care. The choice of the ulcer sites selected (sacral and heel) has been affected by the feasibility of tape positioning.
This study will gather preliminary clinical, health economic, and safety data on the treatment of chronic wounds with the ALLEVYN Life Non-Bordered dressing compared to standard of care treatment when used on a wound.
Introduction Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), also known as topical negative pressure, has become a popular therapy for the treatment of many acute and chronic wounds. In many randomized controlled trials(RCTs), NPWT also has benefit in diabetic foot ulcer and pressure ulcer. However, most studies used commercial VAC device in combined with polyurethane (PU) foam. It is not yet clear where NPWT combined with gauze as wound filler is as effective as the PU foam. This RCT evaluated the efficacy of the gauze and PU foam, two kinds of fillers routinely used in negative pressure wound therapy, on the healing of the diabetic lower-extremity ulcers and the pressure ulcer. Methods From 2010/1 to 2015/01, the in-patient persons with difficult to heal diabetic ulcer or Grade 4 pressure ulcer were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups randomly. The letter of consent was signed by the patient or patient's family. After debridement of the infective wound, the wound of experimental group was packed with a moistened Polyhexamethylene biguamide (PHMB) impregnated gauze (Kerlix AMD, Covidien). A noncollapsible drainage tube (Blake drain, Ethicon) was applied to the wound, and then sealed with 3M Tegaderm Film. The system was connected to a 1-bottle water-seal chest drainage system and to standard wall suction at 125 mmHg negative pressure. The dressing was changed at 72- to 96-hour intervals (twice a week) for a period of 3 weeks. To the control group, the PU foam dressing from KCI was packed and sealed to the wound with the same continuous wall suction at -125mmHg. Investigators observed and recorded the ulcer area twice a week on each time of changing dressing in the following 3 weeks. The percentage of wound area reduction(PWAR) was used as a predictor of wound healing. The repeated measuring data were analyzed using linear mixed mode with SPSS statistical software. This clinical study was approved and monitored by Institutional Review Board of Show Chwan Memorial Hospital.