Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04806503
Other study ID # CUNR844A2202
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date June 30, 2021
Est. completion date October 14, 2022

Study information

Verified date June 2024
Source Novartis
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Study of safety and efficacy of UNR844 in subjects with presbyopia.


Description:

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked,multi-arm, parallel-group, multi-center 13-month study which consisted of: - A 1 week run-in period - A 3-month treatment course with UNR844 and/or Placebo - A 9-month treatment holiday period Participants were randomized equally to one of five treatment arms: UNR844 5 mg/mL,UNR844 13.3 mg/mL, UNR844 23 mg/mL, UNR844 30 mg/mL, or Placebo eye drops twice-a-day for three months. Participants underwent a 1 week run-in period where they were assessed for entry criteria during the Screening visit. During the run-in period, participants self-administered 1 drop of artificial tears twice-a-day (1 drop in the morning and 1 drop in the evening) in each eye at home. This run-in period was designed to help minimize any potential variability in distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) caused due to initial ocular surface issues and help to establish an accurate baseline prior to randomization. The run-in period was to help exclude participants with a change in DCNVA of 0.10 logMAR difference between Screening and Baseline. This study was conducted to determine the optimum dose of UNR844 treatment and the duration of effect of UNR844 treatment for further development.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 234
Est. completion date October 14, 2022
Est. primary completion date July 27, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 45 Years to 55 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed - Impaired near vision in each eye and when using both eyes, without any near correction - Need a certain level of near correction Exclusion Criteria: - Impaired distance vision in either eye, with distance correction (if any) - Severe short- or long-sightedness - Any significant medical or clinical conditions affecting vision, the eyes or general health

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
UNR844
Ophthalmic solution for topical ocular administration
Placebo
Placebo

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Novartis Investigative Site East Melbourne Victoria
Australia Novartis Investigative Site Sydney New South Wales
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Kitchener Ontario
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Quebec
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Vancouver British Columbia
Canada Novartis Investigative Site Waterloo Ontario
Japan Novartis Investigative Site Shinjuku ku Tokyo
Japan Novartis Investigative Site Suita-city Osaka
United States Novartis Investigative Site Kingston Pennsylvania
United States Novartis Investigative Site Laguna Hills California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Lake Villa Illinois
United States Novartis Investigative Site Largo Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Memphis Tennessee
United States Novartis Investigative Site Newport Beach California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Newport Beach California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Pittsburg Kansas
United States Novartis Investigative Site San Antonio Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Sioux Falls South Dakota
United States Novartis Investigative Site Smyrna Tennessee
United States Novartis Investigative Site Washington Missouri

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Canada,  Japan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Characterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3 Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in binocular DCNVA (without near correction) in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Baseline, Month 3
Secondary Characterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3 Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in monocular (worse-seeing eye) DCNVA in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40 cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Baseline, Month 3
Secondary Characterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3 Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in monocular (better-seeing eye) DCNVA in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision. Baseline, Month 3
Secondary Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3 Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in binocular DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.
Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.
Baseline, Month 3
Secondary Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3 Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in monocular (worse-seeing eye) DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.
Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.
Baseline, Month 3
Secondary Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3 Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in monocular (better-seeing eye) DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.
Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.
Baseline, Month 3
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05326607 - Pilot Clinical Investigation of Adaptative Eyeglasses for the Correction of Presbyopia N/A
Recruiting NCT06060041 - IC-8 Apthera IOL New Enrollment Post Approval Study
Completed NCT05495971 - Extended Depth of Focus Contact Lenses for Presbyopia N/A
Completed NCT05464732 - Vivity IOL: Emmetropia Compared to Monovision. N/A
Recruiting NCT06045299 - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of LNZ101 and LNZ100 for the Presbyopia Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT04151550 - Safety & Efficacy of the Laser Scleral Microporation Procedure (Philippines) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05506553 - Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lenses for Micro-monovision N/A
Completed NCT02554396 - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of PRX-100 in the Treatment of Early to Moderate Presbyopia Phase 2
Completed NCT02235831 - DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus® Multifocal (MF) - Comparative Assessment of Visual Performance N/A
Completed NCT02214797 - Dispensing Study to Assess Visual Performance of Prototype Contact Lenses N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT01443585 - Clinical Evaluation of a Progressive Addition Lens (PAL) N/A
Completed NCT01591499 - Clinical Evaluation of Biofinity Multifocal Compared With Air Optix Aqua Multifocal and With PureVision Multifocal N/A
Completed NCT04983589 - A Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy in Participants Age 40 to 55 With Presbyopia (Old Eye) Who Receive AGN-190584 in Both Eyes Twice Daily Phase 3
Completed NCT02740010 - The Visual Performances of a Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens With Extended Depth of Focus
Recruiting NCT05796453 - Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study of Clareon Vivity & Clareon PanOptix N/A
Completed NCT02516306 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of EV06 Ophthalmic Solution in Improving Vision in Subjects With Presbyopia Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT05359380 - The Impact of Light Conditions on the Efficacy of Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Activities of Daily Living
Not yet recruiting NCT04522427 - Study of Presbyopia-correcting Intraocular Lenses in Eyes With Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03688425 - Comparison of Clinical Outcomes POD L GF vs POD F GF in Asian Eyes N/A
Recruiting NCT06053463 - Evaluation of Soft Multifocal Lenses in Presbyopic Previous Contact Lens Wearers N/A

External Links