View clinical trials related to Premature Birth.
Filter by:Introduction: To evaluate the maternal blood serum matrix metalloproteinase 14, neopterin, and orosomucoid 1 levels in pregnant women complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and to compare the results with healthy pregnancies. In addition, to determine whether maternal/umbilical cord blood concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase 14, neopterin, and orosomucoid 1 are of value in the diagnosis of histological chorioamnionitis in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Methods: This cohort study will be included 44 pregnant women with PPROM and 44 gestational age-matched healthy subjects in 24-32 weeks of pregnancy. The blood for analysis will be firstly obtained in maternal blood on the day of diagnosis at the study group. Healthy subjects who have a normal pregnancy and outcomes without any fetal-neonatal complications will be accepted into the control group. Forty-four gestational age-matched healthy pregnant women who will be delivered at term will be included in the study as the control group. In the control group, the pregnant women will be taken the maternal blood at the admission day. The women in both groups will be observed until the delivery and perinatal data will be noted. Then, the blood for analysis will be secondly obtained in maternal blood during termination of the pregnancy (or spontaneous labor) at the study group. Lastly, the blood for analysis will be also obtained in umbilical cord blood at the study group. These three markers levels will be measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. The placenta will be sent to histological examination in the study group. These three markers levels in women with PPROM will be compared to those of volunteer healthy pregnant women. In the study group, these three markers levels at maternal serum and cord serum will be evaluated for histological chorioamnionitis and maternal/neonatal outcomes.
A multicenter interventional study using evidence-based collaborative quality improvement to reduce mortality and major morbidities of very preterm infants in six neonatal centers in Shanghai
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that allowing infants that require high flow nasal cannula (HFNC)/Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to orally feed if demonstrating oral cues will achieve full oral feeds faster.
There is no consensus around the world on the treatment of preterm rupture of membranes, which is one of the important causes of early neonatal sepsis and one of the common causes of prematurity. Different countries, hospitals and physicians can determine different treatment approaches. There is very little scientific data on the benefit of commonly used treatment regimens other than experience. In this study, scientific results will be obtained by comparing the efficacy of treatments (Sulbactam ampicillin or azithromycin ampicillin) in two different hospitals (Hacettepe University Perinatology Clinic and Ankara City Hospital Perinatology Clinic), and it will be shown which treatment regimen reduces early neonatal sepsis and inflammation better. Some samples (vaginal IL-6, vaginal-cervical swab samples for atypical bacteria, cervical swab samples for direct microscopy, serum IL-6) will be taken from pregnant women who develop membrane rupture and these samples will be used as initial inflammation markers. Each physician will decide on the treatment of his own patient, there will be no intervention in the treatment of the patient within the scope of the research. Patients will continue their routine follow-up after receiving their treatment. When the delivery occurs, the level of IL-6 in the cord blood will be examined with other inflammation markers (procalcitonin, crp, complete blood count), and the neonatal inflammation status of the baby will be determined. The low inflammation markers detected in the babies of pregnant women with high initial inflammation values will be compared and it will be determined which treatment is more effective. At the same time, routine neonatal intensive care follow-ups of these babies will be continued and treatment efficiency in terms of early neonatal sepsis will be determined. This study will present scientific data on which treatment is effective in the literature and will guide international treatment guidelines. At the same time, preterm rupture of membranes will show which bacterial agent plays a more role in the etiology and which of the inflammation markers have more sensitivity and specificity, as well as the success of the treatment, which is the subject of the study. The routine use of some examinations (such as cervical PCR) performed before the treatment begins, is a guide in the selection of agent-specific treatment and may shorten the unnecessary drug use and hospital stay; The management of patients may vary according to the initial inflammation parameters. Physicians evaluating the results of this study can evaluate the risk of their babies in terms of early neonatal sepsis according to the initial inflammation values of their patients, and increase and decrease the length of hospital stay.
Purpose of Study: Apnoea of Prematurity (AOP) is common, affecting the majority of infants born <34 weeks gestational age (GA). Apnea is accompanied by intermittent hypoxia (IH), which contributes to multiple pathologies, including retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), sympathetic ganglia injury, impaired pancreatic islet cell and bone development, and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Standard of care for AOP/IH includes prone positioning, positive pressure ventilation, and caffeine therapy. The objective of this device is to provide an adjunct to current AoP treatment to support breathing in premature infants by using a simple, non-invasive vibratory device placed over limb proprioceptor fibers, an intervention using the principle that limb movements facilitate breathing. Methods Used: Premature infants (27+6 - 34+6 weeks GA) with clinical confirmed weeks with diagnosis of Apnoea of Prematurity. Caffeine therapy was not a reason for exclusion. Small vibration devices were placed on one hand and one foot and activated in a 6 hour ON/OFF sequence for a total of 24 hours. Heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), and breathing pauses were continuously collected.
This is a retrospective, observational study based on the consortium of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. This study will evaluate if the number of admitted extremely preterm infants has decreased in the SafeBoosC-III departments during the global lockdown, and whether there is an association between the level of lockdown restrictions and change in the number of ELGAN admissions.
Investigators propose a prospective study to investigate the effect of full light protection of the PN on cholestasis and other oxidative stress associated diseases in premature infants when they receive PN for more than one week. Each infant enrolled in this study will receive full PN light protection including the PN bag, lipids and tubing. Demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes (incidence of cholestasis, feeding tolerance, BPD, ROP, NEC and mortality) and oxidative stress markers (e.g., carboxyhemeglobin) will be evaluated. Phase one of this study employed a retrospective chart review methodology to evaluate the effect of no PN light protection vs partial PN light protection (PN solution only while it's the tubing and lipids remained exposed to light). Infants from phase one of this study will serve as the controls in the evaluation the effect of full PN light protection on the cholestasis, clinical outcomes and oxidative stress. Investigators propose to collect urine and saliva samples in infants who we expect to receive PN for a minimum of 5 days, on days 0, 3, 5 and every 7 days after TPN initiation until 2 weeks after the end of IV nutrition to evaluate oxidative stress.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dopamine which is used as treatment of hypotension in neonate and preterm infant.
Crying is a survival mechanism for babies and their almost exclusive means of expression until the age of 4 months. Babies 'cry is mostly related to pain, a feeling of hunger, discomfort or separation following the departure of a parent around. Crying is a complex but essential means of communication and information between a baby and his parents that raises the question of their meaning. Very few longitudinal studies have been produced on preterm's crying. As the term approaches, the characteristics of preterm babies' crying are similar to those of term infants. But these studies date back more than 30 years and are obsolete in terms of the quality and performance of sound recording equipment and signal processing. No study has looked at the genesis of the cry itself and the varieties of the cry of the preterm baby, depending on whether it was in a situation of hunger, pain, discomfort (bath).
Babies born very early (at less than 32 weeks) usually need help to breath right at birth, also called neonatal resuscitation. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are specially trained to provide this help. HCPs uses information about the baby's condition, such heart rate and oxygen levels, to decide whether they giving the baby effective help, or whether other actions are needed. It can be very stressful for even experienced HCPs to interpret all this data, coordinate a team, make decisions, and perform specialized skills all at the same time. More recently, new ways of monitoring how a baby is doing neonatal resuscitation has been studied. Respiratory function monitoring (RFM) is a machine that can measure how much air is going into the lungs. This is important as too much air can lead to lung damage, while too little air means that the baby isn't breathing effectively. Another measure is called cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (cNIRS), which measures oxygen levels in the brain using a probe placed on the forehead. Providing the right amount of oxygen to the most vulnerable organ - the brain - can be important in lowering the risk for injuries to the brain such as brain bleeding. While these machines give us more information, it can also make it even harder for HCPs to focus on the task, adding more complexity to making decisions, adding to their workload, and causing more stress. To study the effect RFM and cNIRS may have on how affects HCPs workload and stress, the investigators will study HCPs self-reported workload during three time periods - first, doing resuscitations only using basic information (Group 1: heart rate, oxygen levels, direct observations of the baby), second, adding RFM (Group 2), finally adding both RFM and cNIRS (Group 3). A survey called NASA Task Load Index will be used to study HCPs workload. On a small number of teams, the investigators will also track where the leader of the team is looking using eye-tracking glasses, how stressed the leader is by measuring their heart rate, skin sweat, and pupil dilation. Finally, the investigators will collect some information about the baby's resuscitation and hospital stay.