View clinical trials related to Pregnancy, Unplanned.
Filter by:The goal of the cluster randomized trial is to evaluate the impact of a reproductive health and empowerment intervention (TARANG) compared to the standard of care health information (control group) on the prevalence of contraceptive use and time-to-pregnancy (primary outcomes) in Rajasthan, India. Participants will participate in TARANG intervention and receive the following sessions: 1. Navigating newly formed relationships (e.g. spousal communication, healthy relationships with in-laws, establishing peer network, and negotiation skills) 2. Improving women's awareness of sexual reproductive health 3. Challenging inequitable gender norms with an aim to reduce unintended pregnancies. 4. Life skills education to enable them to have improved social mobility, decision-making, and agency. Investigators will compare the TARANG intervention with the standard of care to see if it delays unintended pregnancies among women.
The goal of this project is to evaluate the components of the app-based intervention Mission Wellness to reduce health-risking sexual behaviors (HRSBs; e.g., condom non-use, multiple sexual partners) in active-duty members of the US Military to improve their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and readiness to serve. Following the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework, factorial component selection experiments (CSEs) will be conducted to evaluate which five experimental intervention components (i.e., Narratives, Skills, Scenarios, Future, and Risk) elicit the greatest improvements in the outcomes of interest given key constraints.
Developed from a piloted intervention and based on scientific evidence, About Us is an innovative healthy relationships intervention that promotes positive adolescent romantic relationships and use of condoms and highly effective contraceptives if having sex. The program includes 10 lessons (2 that are between 30-45 minutes long 8 that are 50 minutes long) that blend group-based activities with online activities implemented in a small group format with students in grades 9 or 10 who have parental consent and provide assent to take part. The program will be implemented in school-based health centers (SBHCs). Primary research question: 1. Nine months following the end of the program, what is the impact of About Us relative to the standard of care on: 1.1. Rates of vaginal or anal sex without condoms in the past three months? Secondary research questions: 2. Three and nine months following the end of the program, what is the impact of About Us relative to the standard of care on: 2.1. Rates of abstinence from vaginal or anal sex in the past three months? 2.2. Frequency of communicating without abuse? 2.3. Utilization of school-based health center services? 2.4. Rates of behavioral willingness and attitudes toward birth control? Exploratory research questions: 3. Three and nine months following the end of the program, what is the impact of About Us relative to the standard of care on: 3.1. The psychosocial variables stemming from the theoretical framework (e.g., attitudes toward condom and contraceptive use, normative beliefs, perceived self-efficacy to use condoms or have difficult conversations) and enumerated in the logic model. 3.2. Outcomes listed above within key sub-groups including those defined by sex (male/female), race/ethnicity, and exposure to violence; 4. Among those receiving About Us, how do effect sizes for the primary and secondary behavioral outcomes vary by dosage?
This study aims to compare an algorithm for IV sedation dosing to the current standard of care in patients undergoing first trimester surgical abortion. The primary outcome is subjects' pain score with suction curettage on a 0-100 21-point scale. Secondary outcomes include pain scores with cervical dilation and 15 minutes post-procedure, subjective pain ratings, incidents of side effects and adverse events, the frequency of additional doses of medication, recovery room time, and physician assessment of and satisfaction with pain control. Investigators hypothesize that this algorithm will result in improved pain control, decreased frequency of additional medication doses, improved patient and physician satisfaction, without differences in side effects, adverse events or recovery room time.
The purpose of this research study is to test the levonorgestrel intrauterine system as a method for emergency contraception. Emergency contraception refers to pregnancy prevention after an act of intercourse. While the levonorgestrel intrauterine system is approved as a contraceptive method, it is considered investigational as emergency contraception, which means that it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This study will compare the device to the most common types of emergency contraception, oral Ulipristal acetate, or oral levonorgestrel. The oral levonorgestrel regimen was approved as a method of emergency contraception by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1998. This method involves taking a 1.5mg pill of levonorgestrel in a single, one time dose. The Ulipristal acetate was approved as a method of emergency contraception by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2010. This method involves taking a 30mg pill of Ulipristal acetate in a single, one time dose.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of SH T00658ID (EV/DNG tablet) on hemostatic parameters in comparison to a reference oral contraceptive (OC) (SH D01155E) in a crossover design.