Trial of the Teens and Toddlers Intervention

Pregnancy in Adolescence Clinical Trial

Official title:

RCT of the Teens and Toddlers Intervention

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01310543
• Other study ID #: TTRCT
• Secondary ID: TTRCT
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: March 4, 2011
• Last updated: September 13, 2016
• Start date: December 2009
• Est. completion date: October 2011

Study information

• Verified date: April 2011
• Source: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United Kingdom: Research Ethics Committee
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Teens and Toddlers is an intervention that enables young people at risk of teenage pregnancy to spend time mentoring a toddler as well as participating in counselling and classroom work focused on youth development. This trial aims to test primary hypotheses that girls age 13/14 who are randomly allocated to participate in the T&T intervention are more likely to report use of contraception at last sex, less likely to report frequent sex without contraception over the previous 3 months, less likely to expect to become teenage parents and more likely to report high scores for youth development indicators one year after the intervention than are similar girls who are randomised not to participate. The trial involves a total of 180 girls per arm and is being conducted across England funded by the Department for Education and conducted by the London School of Hygiene and the National Centre for Social Research.

Description:

1. Introduction and research questions

Although systematic reviews suggest the potential effectiveness of in-service learning (i.e. volunteering) and youth development as approaches to preventing teenage pregnancy, no intervention involving toddler-mentoring has been previously evaluated. Teens and Toddlers (T&T) is an intervention that enables young people at risk of teenage pregnancy to spend time mentoring a toddler as well as participating in counselling and classroom work focused on youth development. This trial aims to answer the following research questions:

1. What is the effect of the T&T intervention on participants' use of contraception at last sex, sex without contraception over the previous 3 months, expectation of teenage parenthood and youth development (primary outcomes) one year after intervention delivery?

2. What is the effect of the T&T intervention on participants' experience of teenage pregnancy, use of condoms at last sex, sex without condoms over the previous 3 months, emotional self-reflection and emotional vocabulary , dislike of school and knowledge of contraception (secondary outcomes) one year after intervention delivery?

2. Intervention, setting and participants

The T&T intervention is to be delivered in 22 sites in the south-east, north-east and north-west of England. Each site comprised a nursery and secondary school. Participants will be recruited in two cohorts (September 2009 and February 2010). Participants and parents will be asked to give informed consent and participating young women will be surveyed at baseline, and then randomised to intervention or control group (see below).

3. Sample size

Our power calculation focused on our primary outcome, no contraception use at last sex in the previous 6 months, which we anticipate being of 25% prevalence among our comparison group at follow-up 2, informed by the previous Ripple trial. Assuming this prevalence, in order to detect a halving of risk (in the range of effects reported by for example the Safer Choices and CAS-Carrera studies) with 80% power and 95% precision would require a sample of 180 per arm.

In addition, a further 120 girls are to be recruited at baseline to act as potential reserves should girls allocated to receive the T&T intervention drop out of the intervention in its first 8 weeks. Where such drop-out did occur, the girl dropping out of the intervention and her matched pair in the comparison group would nonetheless remain in the trial analytic sample in order to minimize selection bias. A reserve pair from the same school, one randomized to replace the drop-out on the intervention and one allocated to comparison group, would augment the drop-outs in the analytic sample. Any girls who drop out of T&T after 8 weeks will not be replaced on the intervention and will also remain in the trial analytic sample.

The sample will be recruited through the participating schools. Each school will recruit young women in groups (one or two groups per year-cohort depending on the size of the school and the level of involvement). The average size of each group will be 12 girls of whom 6 will be randomised to T&T and 6 to the control group (with an additional 4 girls recruited as reserves for every group, half of whom would if necessary be randomised to T&T and half randomised to the control group).

4. Randomisation

Within each school, girls will complete baseline assessment and be put into matched pairs based on age and sexual experience. Then they will be given a random number using a computer-based random number generator. Within each pair, the girl with the lowest number would be selected for the Teens and Toddlers programme and the girl with the highest number would be in the comparison group. The reserve pairs would be selected in a similar way, each pair would be given a random number. The two pairs with the lowest random numbers would become the reserve pairs, and the six pairs with the highest random numbers would form the main pairs for the evaluation. This randomisation process will be done using anonymised data remotely at the Offices of the National Centre for Social Research. Notification of girls' allocation will then be sent to the schools so that teachers can inform girls. Neither girls, teachers nor intervention providers can be blinded to allocation. Research data collection and analysis staff will be blinded to allocation.

5. Outcome measures

We have pre-hypothesised primary and secondary outcomes in order to avoid bias through 'data-dredging' for significant results. We have tried to balance having sufficient breadth to reflect the potentially broad benefits of participation in the T&T programme, with the need to reduce the possibility of false-positive results arising from multiple tests of statistical significance. Full questions are available on request. All measures will be piloted within an independent sample of young people who will be then interviewed regarding their understanding of the meaning of the questions and the meaning of their responses. These outcomes will be measured at follow-up 2 (72 weeks) via pen and paper self-completion questionnaire surveys done under exam conditions in a classroom supervised by two researchers with no teachers present.

6. Data collection methods

Participants will be surveyed at baseline, at the end of the programme (20 weeks) and one year after the programme is completed (72 weeks). Girls will be offered £10 vouchers to girls in intervention and comparison group for completion of questionnaires. A repeat visit to schools will be made to survey those students missing the previous visit. Multiple forms of contact information will also be taken so that students repeatedly missing from, or moving, school can be tracked down.

7. Analysis

There is no plan for an interim analysis done to inform whether stopping rules should be implemented because by the time an analysis of follow-up 2 data for cohort 1 is available then cohort 2 will already have experienced the intervention. Analysis of effects estimates will be done on an 'intention to treat' basis with all participants and controls originally recruited to the study plus any reserves brought into the programme to augment drop-outs being included in the analysis regardless of attendance in the programme. Logistic regression will be used to estimate effect sizes for binary outcomes and ANOVA for continuous measures. Each will generate crude and adjusted estimates, the latter adjusting for any significant (P<0.1) baseline differences in socio-demographic measures or baseline values of outcome measures.

8. Governance

The trial will be managed by an executive group consisting of researchers from the National Centre for Social Research and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine which will meet monthly. The Trial Steering Group function will be fulfilled by a committee comprising representatives from each research team, the funders (Department for Education), the providers (Teens and Toddlers) as well as two independent members (Meg Wiggins, Senior Research Fellow, Social Science Research unit, Institute of Education and Sally Hopewell, Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford). This group will meet quarterly to scrutinise trial design and methods and assess data quality. This group will thus including within its function that of a data monitoring committee.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 449
• Est. completion date: October 2011
• Est. primary completion date: October 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 13 Years to 14 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Young women age 13/14

2. Perceived by teachers as:disengaged from or uninterested in school; not working to their potential in school; exhibiting poor or disruptive behaviour in class; having a poor attendance record; parents rarely/never attending parents' evenings; parent or sibling being a teenage parent; and/or being currently/previously in care

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pregnancy in Adolescence

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Teens and Toddlers
The T&T intervention aims to prevent teenage pregnancy and promote sexual health by providing young women at risk of teenage pregnancy with regular and direct contact with a toddler and combines this with 12 modules of group-based personal-development sessions involving communication skills, anger management, discussion of positive sexual health and relationships, culminating in an accredited National Award in Interpersonal Skills. One-to-one life coaching is also provided. The intervention consists of 20 weekly afternoon sessions run in nurseries near to the secondary schools from which participating young women are recruited.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United Kingdom	National Centre for Social Research	London

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Use of contraception at last sex	Self-report measure based on pen and paper questionnaire	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Frequency of sex without contraception over the previous 3 months	Also self-report (N.B. Because of the broad aims of the intervention this outcome is being treated as a primary outcome also)	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Expectation of teenage parenthood	Also self report (N.B. Because of the broad aims of the intervention this outcome is being treated as a primary outcome also)	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Youth development	Composite score derived from scaled items (N.B. Because of the broad aims of the intervention this outcome is being treated as a primary outcome also)	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Teenage pregnancy	Self-report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Use of condoms at last sex	Self-report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Sex without condoms over the previous 3 months	Examines episodes of sex without condom use via self report measure	72 weeks	No
Secondary	emotional self-reflection	Self report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Emotional vocabulary	Self-report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Dislike of school	Self report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Knowledge of contraception	Composite score drawing on several self-report items	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Doesn't positively like self	Self-report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Believes best age to have sex <16	Self report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Attitude to unprotected sex	Self report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Believes it would be difficult to talk openly about sex with boyfriend	Self report	72 weeks	No
Secondary	Believes it would be difficult to talk about the pill in clinic or with doctor	Self report	72 weeks	No