View clinical trials related to PPROM.
Filter by:Accurate and timely diagnosis of preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM) is important to prevent adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Following a history of PPROM, physical examination should be performed in a way that minimizes the risk of infection using a speculum. This is important to confirm the diagnosis by visualizing the amniotic fluid passing from the cervical canal or pooling in the vagina. In addition to examining the cervix to assess its dilatation and effacement and look for umbilical cord prolapse or fetal prolapse. However, Pelvic exam is one of the most common anxiety provoking medical procedures that's why this study aims at using the transperineal ultrasound as a non-invasive, accurate, cost effective, applicable and readily available tool in assessment of PPROM with less patient anxiety and fear.
After preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM)[breaking of the amniotic sac prior to 37 weeks gestation in pregnancy], patients are recommended for inpatient admission and close monitoring for complications including preterm labor, intraamniotic infection (infection of the sac around the baby), and placental abruption (separation of the placenta from wall of the uterus). When evaluation of cervical dilation is clinically indicated, obstetricians traditionally perform sterile speculum exams due to concern for decrease in pregnancy latency (length of time between breaking the water and delivery) with sterile digital exams in retrospective studies. These studies are concerning, however, by the indications for the exams and are at risk for confounding by indication. This is a randomized, non-inferiority trial to examine if sterile digital versus speculum exams effect latency of pregnancy in patients with PPROM.
When time allows, administration of mifepristone prior to second trimester induction of labor decreases total labor time. However, in the setting of many pregnancy complications, decreasing time from diagnosis of nonviable pregnancy to delivery is of utmost importance to decrease risk of maternal complications. Previous data has shown that total abortion time is longer in the group receiving mifepristone owing to the delay between mifepristone administration and initiation of misoprostol induction of labor. Thus, the investigators aim to investigate whether simultaneous mifepristone and misoprostol has benefits over misoprostol alone when labor induction of a nonviable second trimester cannot be delayed.
An EONS occurred in nearly 14-22 % of the preterm infant of pregnant women with PPROM. To this day no risk prediction is established. The main aim of this pilot study is generating primary data with a focus on the vaginal microbiome to set-up a prospective, multi-centre trial investigating the role of the vaginal microbiome for future EONS risk prediction. The planned PEONS pilot trial is subdivided in three Work packages: 1. Recruitment, sample collection and routine clinical diagnostics 2. Microbiome analysis by 16S rRNA 3. Microbiome/ Metagenome analysis by "Nanopore" (proof-of-principle) and will enroll women with a PPROM event hospitalized between 22+0 and 34+0 weeks of gestation and neonates with signs of EONS (Subgroup 1) and without signs of EONS (Subgroup 2).