Postpartum Smoking Relapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Smoking Cessation Intervention in Pregnancy According to the Web-Based Transtheoretic Model on Postpartum Smoking Relapse
NCT number | NCT05711225 |
Other study ID # | SYILMAZ |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 24, 2021 |
Est. completion date | December 1, 2022 |
Verified date | January 2023 |
Source | Adiyaman University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The postpartum period is an important opportunity to improve maternal and fetal health by preventing smoking relapse in women. To achieve this goal, digital platforms, which are the latest technological developments are used. However, studies using digital platforms on smoking cessation and postpartum smoking relapse in pregnant women are limited in this area. The research was carried out to determine the effect of smoking cessation intervention prepared in line with the transtheoretic model on the digital platform, on preventing smoking relapse in the postpartum period. As a result of the research, it is thought that nurses will guide their professional practices with an evidence-based up-to-date approach.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 70 |
Est. completion date | December 1, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | May 1, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Don't have a smartphone - Having the ability to use the Internet - 32nd gestational week and below - Reporting smoking at least two cigarettes per day in the 3 months before conception Exclusion criteria from the study: • Not watching videos within the scope of web-based intervention. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Semra YILMAZ | Merkez | Adiyaman |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Semra YILMAZ |
Turkey,
Caleyachetty R, Thomas GN, Toulis KA, Mohammed N, Gokhale KM, Balachandran K, Nirantharakumar K. Metabolically Healthy Obese and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events Among 3.5 Million Men and Women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 19;70(12):1429-1437. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.763. — View Citation
Chamberlain C, O'Mara-Eves A, Porter J, Coleman T, Perlen SM, Thomas J, McKenzie JE. Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2(2):CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub5. — View Citation
Dascal M, Rusu A, Onisor A, Blaga O, Miller M, Meghea C. An mHealth intervention to prevent postnatal smoking relapse: The RESPREMO study protocol. Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Apr 14;6:24. doi: 10.18332/tpc/118724. eCollection 2020. — View Citation
Derksen ME, Kunst AE, Murugesu L, Jaspers MWM, Fransen MP. Smoking cessation among disadvantaged young women during and after pregnancy: Exploring the role of social networks. Midwifery. 2021 Jul;98:102985. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102985. Epub 2021 Mar 11. — View Citation
Diamanti A, Papadakis S, Schoretsaniti S, Rovina N, Vivilaki V, Gratziou C, Katsaounou PA. Smoking cessation in pregnancy: An update for maternity care practitioners. Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Aug 2;17:57. doi: 10.18332/tid/109906. eCollection 2019. — View Citation
Dilcen HY, Öztürk A, Yildiz MN. Gebelikte Sigara Kullaniminin Algilanan Sosyal Destek, Benlik Saygisi ve Psikolojik Saglamlik ile Iliskisi. Bagimlilik Derg 2021, 22(2): 161-70.
Harmer C, Memon A. Factors associated with smoking relapse in the postpartum period: an analysis of the child health surveillance system data in Southeast England. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 May;15(5):904-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts221. Epub 2012 Oct 8. — View Citation
Herbec A, Beard E, Brown J, Gardner B, Tombor I, West R. The needs and preferences of pregnant smokers regarding tailored Internet-based smoking cessation interventions: a qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 14;14:1070. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1070. — View Citation
Jones M, Lewis S, Parrott S, Wormall S, Coleman T. Re-starting smoking in the postpartum period after receiving a smoking cessation intervention: a systematic review. Addiction. 2016 Jun;111(6):981-90. doi: 10.1111/add.13309. Epub 2016 Mar 16. — View Citation
Kahyaoglu S, Özel S, Üstün YE, Erdöl C. Gebelik ve Sigara Birakma. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tip Derg 2018, 15: 1.
Lange S, Probst C, Rehm J, Popova S. National, regional, and global prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jul;6(7):e769-e776. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30223-7. Epub 2018 May 31. — View Citation
Lanting CI, van Wouwe JP, van den Burg I, Segaar D, van der Pal-de Bruin KM. [Smoking during pregnancy: trends between 2001 and 2010]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(46):A5092. Dutch. — View Citation
Loukopoulou AN, Vardavas CI, Farmakides G, Rossolymos C, Chrelias C, Tzatzarakis MN, Tsatsakis A, Lymberi M, Connolly GN, Behrakis PK. Design and study protocol of the maternal smoking cessation during pregnancy study, (M-SCOPE). BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 6;11:903. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-903. — View Citation
Marufu TC, Ahankari A, Coleman T, Lewis S. Maternal smoking and the risk of still birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 13;15:239. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1552-5. — View Citation
Notley C, Gentry S, Livingstone-Banks J, Bauld L, Perera R, Hartmann-Boyce J. Incentives for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 17;7(7):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub6. — View Citation
Scheffers-van Schayck T, Tuithof M, Otten R, Engels R, Kleinjan M. Smoking Behavior of Women Before, During, and after Pregnancy: Indicators of Smoking, Quitting, and Relapse. Eur Addict Res. 2019;25(3):132-144. doi: 10.1159/000498988. Epub 2019 Mar 27. — View Citation
Stead LF, Koilpillai P, Fanshawe TR, Lancaster T. Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 24;3:CD008286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008286.pub3. — View Citation
Tarhan P, Yilmaz T. Gebelikte sigara kullanimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Saglik Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Derg 2016, 3(3): 140-7.
Tombor I, Neale J, Shahab L, Ruiz M, West R. Healthcare providers' views on digital smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women. J Smoking Cessat 2015, 10(2): 116-23.
* Note: There are 19 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Measure 1- The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence | The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence was developed to determine the level of addiction to cigarettes.The scores that can be obtained from the scale range from 0 to 10. As addiction to cigarette increases, the score obtained from the scale increases.
it was determined that the mean score of the scale decreased and the level of addiction decreased in the intervention group. |
15 months | |
Primary | Measure 2- Behavior Change Process Scale | It reveals what processes the individual has experienced in the stages of behavior change.The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 22, and the highest is 110. The higher the score obtained from the scale, the higher the chance of success in changing behavior. The higher the score obtained from the scale, the higher the chance of success in changing behavior.
It was determined that women in the intervention group had a higher chance of success in changing their smoking behavior. |
15 months | |
Primary | Measure 3-Self-Efficacy Scale/Encouraging Factors Scale | The Self-Efficacy Scale/Encouraging Factors Scale shows the confidence that individuals have in order not to return to the harmful behavior they have changed when faced with difficult situations. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 8 and the highest 40. A high score on the self-efficacy scale reveals the success of not smoking and quitting smoking despite encouraging factors. A high score on the Encouraging Factors Scale indicates that the probability of returning to the harmful behavior is high. The Encouraging Factors Scale is used with an answer format that is the opposite of the Self-Efficacy Scale.
Despite the fact that the women in the intervention group faced stimulant situations, not returning to smoking behavior again shows that the power to resist is high. |
15 months | |
Primary | Measure 4-Decision Balance Scale | The decision balance scale reveals the positive and negative perceptions of behavior change. The scale consists of two sub-dimensions that reveal the perception of the positive and negative aspects of smoking. The lowest score that can be obtained for the two sub-dimensions of the scale is 12, and the highest score is 60. A high score on the benefit (positive) sub-dimension indicates his indecision about changing behavior, while a high score on the harm (negative) sub-dimension indicates that has a higher chance of making and continuing a decision on behavior change.
It was determined that women in the intervention group were more determined to change their smoking behavior and were more likely to maintain this determination. |
15 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04114877 -
Perinatal Attentional Retraining Intervention for Smoking for Minority Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04098874 -
Bupropion for the Prevention of Postpartum Smoking Relapse
|
Phase 4 |