Postpartum Preeclampsia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Efficacy of Diltiazem for the Control of Blood Pressure in Puerperal Patients With Severe Preeclampsia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Both preeclampsia and eclampsia are important health problems, being an important cause of
maternal death in the world.
Nifedipine has been used as the drug of choice for the treatment of hypertension during
puerperium for more than 25 years.
Diltiazem is an alternative calcium antagonist that is 1000 times less potent than
nifedipine.
There are no reports in the literature, no randomized clinical trials that prove the
effectiveness of diltiazem for the control of blood pressure in post-partum patients with
severe preeclampsia.
Both preeclampsia and eclampsia are important health problems, being an important cause of
maternal death in the world. Although these two pregnancy-related disorders have been widely
studied, their cause remains unknown. Pathophysiological mechanism involves the reduction of
maternal placental blood flow as of week 20 of gestation, with an increase in peripheral
vascular resistance that predominantly takes place in the kidney, liver and brain.
Nifedipine has been used as the drug of choice for the treatment of hypertension during
puerperium for more than 25 years. However, there are various studies that report in sensible
population the presence of serious adverse effects with the use of this drug, such as
cerebral ischemia, myocardial ischemia or tachycardia, as well as episodes of hyper- and
hypotension. Consequently, it is necessary to find treatment alternatives for this case.
Diltiazem is an alternative calcium antagonist that is 1000 times less potent than
nifedipine, which has the property of producing a selective vasodilatation of arteries beds.
There are no reports in the literature, no randomized clinical trials that prove the
effectiveness of diltiazem for the control of blood pressure in post-partum patients with
severe preeclampsia.
The objective of this study is to evaluate if diltiazem improves the blood pressure
parameters in early puerperium patients with severe preeclampsia.
A researcher who was not involved in the study was performed the randomization by using a
random- numbers table and central allocation. All participants and study staff were blind to
medication condition. The patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups of treatment:
group one was administered 60 mg of diltiazem (tables) while group two (the control) was
administered 10 mg of nifedipine (capsule). Both drugs were administered orally every 8
hours. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures and heart rate were recorded and analyzed
at baseline and 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48 hours.
A Foley catheter was placed to measure urinary excretion. On the other hand, the blood
pressure of all patients was continuously recorded using a monitor (DASH 4000 Dinamar, US)
which provided a reading of systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure trough central venous
catheter. The register was taken during the 48-hour observation period, in order to ensure
that blood pressure was maintained between 120/70 and 160/110 mmHg; either determine
hypotension (which is defined by the pressure at which clinical alterations occur) or
hypertension events.
The size of the sample was calculated with the formula of difference between the means of two
independent samples. We took the systolic pressure values from a pilot study of 10 subjects
for each group. The common standard deviation of delta values (Baseline and after 72-hour
pressure difference) is 19 mmHg, a difference between delta values of the treatments is 16.5
mmHg, and a power level of 0.8, resulting in 21 patients per group.
Comparisons between groups on the repeated measures were made using repeated-measure ANOVA.
Analyses included fixed effects for time (baseline and 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48
hours) and treatments (diltiazem and nifedipine), and treatments×time interactions. If the
interaction was statistically significant, post hoc analysis using the Sidak correction
method for mean differences were used to determine whether the changes in levels of arterial
blood pressure between the longitudinal assessments were statistically significant between
the diltiazem and nifedipine treatments. When necessary, a Greenhouse-Geisser correction was
applied to correct for non-sphericity.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04486170 -
Assessment of Postpartum Education to Improve Compliance
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03613714 -
Innovation in Postpartum Care for Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04752475 -
Lasix for the Prevention of De Novo Postpartum Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05049616 -
Oral Combined Hydrochlorothiazide/Lisinopril Versus Oral Nifedipine for Postpartum Hypertension
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03298802 -
Postpartum Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy With Hydrochlorothiazide
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06310720 -
Postpartum Video Education in High Risk Populations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05849103 -
Comprehensive Postpartum Management for Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05775744 -
Management of Postpartum Preeclampsia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05309460 -
Labetalol or Nifedipine for Control of Postpartum Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05159726 -
Postpartum Video Education
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03749746 -
Heart Health 4 New Moms: A Randomized Trial in the First Year After Preeclampsia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04236258 -
Comparing Nifedipine and Enalapril in Medical Resources Used in the Postpartum Period
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03449277 -
Oral Nifedipine Versus Labetalol in Treatment of Postpartum Hypertension
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05139238 -
Postpartum Hypertension Study
|
Phase 4 |