View clinical trials related to Postpartum Hemorrhage.
Filter by:This study will assess the performance of the Quantra System with the QStat Cartridge versus standard of care coagulation testing in pregnant women at risk of bleeding at delivery.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test if manual external aortic compression can prevent heavy blood loss in cesarean section. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: 1. Is external aortic compression safe? 2. Is external aortic compression effective? Participants will receive preventive external aortic compression or no external aortic compression right after the baby is out at cesarean section. Blood loss will be measured, as well as kidney function, hemoglobin, and hematocrit before and after the operation. Experienced discomfort will be assessed the day after surgery and breastfeeding and signs of depression will be assessed using questionnaires after 2 months. Researchers will compare women with and without external aortic compression to see if there are differences in these outcomes.
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the primary cause of nearly one quarter of all maternal deaths globally. Management of uterine tone after delivery involves giving a prophylactic uterotonic and the use of controlled cord traction to facilitate delivery of the placenta and minimize blood loss. Syntocinon and carbetocin are the most commonly used drugs ,During caesarean delivery of stenotic valvular disease patient, the anesthesiologist have an important question: what is the best drug used for prevention of PPH with minimal hemodynamic effect regarding Systemic vascular resistance (SVR), Cardiac out put (COP),Heart rate ( HR), blood pressure? As uterotonic drugs may cause severe hypotension, decrease in SVR and COP that may not be tolerated by these patients .this thesis aims to compare between syntocinon and carbetocin regarding their effect on cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance using cardiometry in cardiac patients with stenotic lesions during caesarean delivery.
Intrauterine balloon tamponade (IUBT) is recommended worldwide as the second-line therapy to treat postpartum hemorrhage. While much literature demonstrates the effectiveness of this therapy, little is known about how long the IUBT should be used once placed. Though it is common to use IUBT for 12-24 hours, the balloon may be equally effective when used for shorter durations of time, which could have beneficial effects for patients and hospitals. The proposed study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of non-inferiority comparing two durations of time for intrauterine balloon tamponade placement, 6 and 18 hours, in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. The specific aims of the proposed study are to determine: 1) whether quantitative blood loss significantly differs when the balloon is removed in 6 hours compared to 18 hours, 2) whether hemorrhage-related morbidity differs when the IUBT is kept in place for 6 or 18 hours, and 3) whether shorter duration of IUBT placement has beneficial effects including shortened postpartum hospital stays, improved maternal-infant bonding, and reduced postpartum pain prior to maternal discharge from hospital. We hypothesize that, once hemorrhage control has been achieved with IUBT placement, there is no clinically significant difference in postpartum blood loss when the balloon is removed 6 hours after placement compared to 18 hours after placement.