Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06075381 |
Other study ID # |
02129 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 2
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 2024 |
Est. completion date |
November 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2023 |
Source |
Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili |
Contact |
ALVARO I SANCHEZ ORTIZ |
Phone |
+57 3183593663 |
Email |
alvaro.sanchez[@]fvl.org.co |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using PED
(Pulmonary Expansion Device) in tracheostomized patients requiring lung reexpansion therapy
within a single institution. The main question it aims to answer is: In tracheostomized
patients requiring lung reexpansion therapy, does the utilization of PED (Pulmonary Expansion
Device) alongside conventional management constitute a safe and effective strategy for
improving oxygenation, lung volumes, and reducing postoperative pulmonary complications, as
compared to traditional management alone?
Researchers will compare lung expansion therapy with PED plus conventional management versus
lung expansion therapy through conventional management in tracheostomized patients to assess
the safety and efficacy in terms of improvement in oxygenation, lung volumes, and reduction
of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Description:
Sample size: Considering that the utilization of the PED introduces an innovative approach to
the standard postoperative care of tracheostomized patients, who inherently face an elevated
risk of pulmonary complications due to glottis derivation and are unable to engage in
traditional respiratory exercises, there is currently an absence of information within the
reviewed scientific literature concerning any device employed for evaluating gasometry and
lung volume within this specific target population. Consequently, a comparable population
that has undergone lung reexpansion techniques is not present for reference in this context.
Therefore, when it comes to calculating the sample size, our only available reference is our
pilot study involving 10 tracheostomized patients who underwent a lung reexpansion strategy
using the PED. This study demonstrated noticeable improvements in oxygenation and lung
volumes without encountering any related complications.
As a result, the sample size for this feasibility study has been adjusted based on the number
of recently tracheostomized patients admitted to the Adult Intensive Care Unit. Concurrently
in the immediate postoperative phase following thoracic surgery (41 patients) or high
abdominal surgery (16 patients) throughout the year 2021. Consequently, it was determined
that data would be collected from a cohort of 50 patients who meet the predefined inclusion
criteria over one year. Both the intervention and control groups will be randomized equally.
This Phase 2 study aims to provide essential feasibility parameters that facilitate a more
precise estimation of the required sample size, specifically within the distinct population
of tracheostomized individuals requiring lung reexpansion therapy.
Statistical Analysis: All analyses will be conducted using an intention-to-treat analysis,
taking into account the treatment received by each patient in each group following
randomization. If a patient's health condition changes and they require invasive ventilatory
support for more than 24 consecutive hours or are unable to participate in the intervention,
they will be excluded based on exclusion criteria. Blinding will be lifted, and such cases
will not be included in the analysis.
For data presentation, for variables with a normal distribution, the measure of central
tendency summarizing the data will be the mean, and the standard deviation will be used as a
measure of dispersion. When the distribution is non-normal, data will be summarized using the
median and interquartile range for continuous variables. Categorical variables will be
reported as percentages and presented in frequency tables.
Continuous variables will be analyzed using a Student's t-test for normally distributed data
or the Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric data. Categorical variables will be compared
using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.
To test secondary hypotheses 1 and 2, which state that the use of PED in addition to
conventional management is a safe and effective strategy for improving postoperative
oxygenation and lung volumes in tracheostomized patients, a comparison between the PED
intervention and conventional management alone will be conducted for patients requiring lung
reexpansion. This comparison will be achieved using repeated measures analysis of variance
(ANOVA) or the non-parametric Friedman test, as appropriate.
For oxygenation, variables such as oxygen saturation (SaO2), arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2),
and the ratio of arterial oxygen pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (PaFiO2) measured in
arterial gases will be used. For lung volumes, measurements will include inspiratory vital
capacity (IVC), IVC with PED, and tidal volume (Vt) as measured by the spirometer. Pulmonary
pressures will involve maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure
(MEP). These measurements, taken at different postoperative time points, will be compared
using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the non-parametric Friedman test, as
appropriate.
Regarding secondary hypothesis 3, the proportion of patients with postoperative pulmonary
complications between the comparison groups from intervention to the end of follow-up will be
analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as needed, to establish
statistical significance.
A significance level of p<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All analyses
will be conducted using STATA version 15.7.10.