Clinical Trials Logo

Postoperative Blood Loss clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Postoperative Blood Loss.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT02701946 Completed - Clinical trials for Postoperative Blood Loss

Efficacy of Modified Robert Jones Bandages on Reducing Invisible Blood Loss After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Start date: March 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful procedures in orthopaedic surgery. Nevertheless, significant postoperative blood loss and requirement of blood transfusion are still problematic. Total blood loss in TKA can be divided into visible and invisible blood loss. Visible blood loss (VBL) means blood loss from the surgical field and wound drainage while invisible blood loss (IBL) means residual blood in the knee, extravasation into the tissues and loss due to haemolysis. In usual practice, TKA is performed with a bloodless field using a tourniquet. Thus intraoperative blood loss can be negligible and postoperative drainage is only considered as VBLvisible. In terms of IBL, Sehat et al. found that TKA carried a substantial IBL. Their results shown the mean IBL was 765 ml or 49% of the mean total blood loss after TKA. Therefore, the true total blood loss was underestimated if not takes IBL into account. Modified Robert Jones bandage (MRJB) is a bulky compressive dressing that often used in orthopaedic practice. Various techniques of application have been proposed. From the previous study, MRJB could make and maintain the anterolateral muscle compartment pressure for at least 24 hours after TKA. Therefore, theoretically, this bandage can cause the tamponade effect that helps to reduce tissue edema and postoperative bleeding especially IBL after TKA. However this potential benefit of MRJB is unclear and the use of this bandage after TKA is still controversy in clinical practice.

NCT ID: NCT02631980 Completed - Anemia Clinical Trials

HepciFer Study: Hepcidin Overexpression After Hepatectomy : Does Iron Supplementation Make Sense ?

HepciFer
Start date: October 2015
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Hepcifer Trial is designed to assess the value of iv iron administration immediately after liver surgery and consequences of inflammation on iron balance. Fifty patients will be randomized in two treatment groups. Patients will be assigned to receive either iv iron or placebo immediately after liver resection surgery. Biological inflammation parameters, hemoglobin, serum iron and hepcidin levels will be assessed prior to surgery and at day 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30 after surgery.

NCT ID: NCT02427412 Completed - Blood Loss Clinical Trials

Evaluation of Intraarticular Tranexamic Acid to Reduction of Total Blood Loss Following Knee-Arthroplasty

Start date: January 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

A randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study which aims to evaluate the effect of combined intraarticular and intravenous Tranexamic acid on total blood loss following unilateral knee replacement versus only intravenous tranexamic acid.

NCT ID: NCT01622946 Completed - Clinical trials for Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Effect of Topical Application of Tranexamic Acid in Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach

Start date: April 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The effects of topical application of 3g tranexamic acid for 2 hours prior to opening of the suction drain following a total hip replacement

NCT ID: NCT01475669 Completed - Surgical Blood Loss Clinical Trials

Study of Fibrinogen Concentrate (Human) (FCH) to Control Bleeding During Complex Cardiovascular Surgery

REPLACE
Start date: January 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that Fibrinogen Concentrate (Human)(FCH) can reduce the amount of donor blood products needed during complex cardiovascular surgery, and that it is safe and well tolerated. Subjects in this study will get either a FCH or placebo infusion during surgery. This will be in addition to the standard treatment, which is donor blood or blood products. Placebo does not contain any effective medicine. The study is randomised. This means that the likelihood that subjects will get FCH or placebo is 50%. To make the comparison between FCH and placebo as fair as possible, the study is "double blind". This means that neither the subjects nor the study doctor will know if FCH or placebo is administered. If necessary, the study doctor can find out which treatment the subjects are receiving.