Post-surgical Dental Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Study to Compare the Analgesic Efficacy of Two Different Paracetamol Doses as Measured by Post-operative Pain Relief
Verified date | April 2015 |
Source | GlaxoSmithKline |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Study type | Interventional |
GlaxoSmithKline will be conducting this trial to compare analgesic efficacy of paracetamol 1000 mg vs 650 mg. The post-surgical dental pain model will be used to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of paracetamol. Each subject will be enrolled in the study for up to six weeks. The duration of the entire study will be approximately 18 weeks. Each subject will have to come to the clinic for three visits (Screening, Treatment and Follow up visits).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 401 |
Est. completion date | March 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects aged 18 to 45 years with moderate-to-severe dental pain as assessed by verbal rating scale (VRS) and confirmed by a score of at least 50 mm out of 100 mm using a visual analogue (VAS) following the surgical removal of up to two mandibular third molars. If only one mandibular third molar is removed, it must be a full bony impaction. If two mandibular third molars are removed, both may be partial bony impactions OR there may be a combination of one full bony impaction with the second tooth being erupted, soft tissue impaction, or partial bony impaction. Ipsilateral maxillary third molars may be removed at the surgeon's discretion, regardless of impaction level. Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant and lactating females - Allergy/intolerance to study materials or nitrous oxide or local anaesthetic used during surgery - Current or recurrent liver, kidney or cardiac disease, stomach ulcers, gastrointestinal bleeding, gastroesophageal reflux disease, bronchospasm, rhinitis, urticaria or asthma |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Jean Brown Research | Salt Lake City | Utah |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
GlaxoSmithKline |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Sum of Pain Relief and Pain Intensity Differences From 0 to 6 Hours (SPRID 6 Hours) | SPRID:Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at each post-dosing time-point. SPRID score ranged from -5.8 (least pain relief) to 40.3 (highest pain relief). SPID and TOTPAR were calculated as weighted sums of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) and Pain Relief Scores (PRS) at each measurement time, respectively. PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time-point from the baseline [pain severity score range:0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain using a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)]. If the subject rated pain intensity as 2 or 3, pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from baseline pain scores. PRS was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-some relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief] | Every two hours from Baseline to 6 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Relief | Participants recorded the time to first perceptible relief by starting the first stopwatch at the time of dosing and stopping it when he/she experienced the first perceptible pain relief. The first perceptible pain relief was confirmed if the participant also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief. | Baseline to 6 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | Time to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief | Participants recorded the time to meaningful relief by stopping a second stopwatch when they first began to experience meaningful relief. | Baseline to 6 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | Time to Start Using Rescue Medication | Median time of use of rescue medication by participants. | Baseline to 6 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication at 2 Hours | Percentage of participants who received rescue medication at different time points post dose. | Baseline to 2 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication at 6 Hours | Percentage of participants who received rescue medication at different time points post dose. | Baseline to 6 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | SPRID at 2 Hours | SPRID:Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at each post-dosing time-point. SPRID score ranged from -1.8 (least pain relief) to 12.3 (highest pain relief). SPID and TOTPAR were calculated as weighted sums of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) and Pain Relief Scores (PRS) at each measurement time, respectively. PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time-point from the baseline [pain severity score range:0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain using a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)]. If the subject rated pain intensity as 2 or 3, pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from baseline pain scores. PRS was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-some relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief | Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | SPRID at 4 Hours | SPRID:Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at each post-dosing time-point. SPRID score ranged from -3.8 (least pain relief) to 26.3 (highest pain relief). SPID and TOTPAR were calculated as weighted sums of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) and Pain Relief Scores (PRS) at each measurement time, respectively. PID was derived by subtracting the pain severity score at a given post-dosing time-point from the baseline [pain severity score range:0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain using a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)]. If the subject rated pain intensity as 2 or 3, pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from baseline pain scores. PRS was assessed on 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-some relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief | Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | Total Pain Relief Score (TOTPAR) at 2 Hours | TOTPAR was calculated as sum of products of pain relief (PR) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120. Higher score indicated greater pain relief. TOTPARt = ?PR x (timet - timet-1). PR score was assessed at each of the above time-points based on a 5-point categorical scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-meaningful relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief]. |
Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | TOTPAR at 4 Hours | TOTPAR was calculated as sum of products of pain relief (PR) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-240. Higher score indicated greater pain relief. TOTPARt = ?PR x (timet - timet-1). PR score was assessed at each of the above time-points based on a 5-point categorical scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-meaningful relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief]. |
Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | TOTPAR at 6 Hours | TOTPAR was calculated as sum of products of pain relief (PR) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-240, 240-300 and 300-360. Higher score indicated greater pain relief. TOTPARt = ?PR x (timet - timet-1). PR score was assessed at each of the above time-points based on a 5-point categorical scale [0-no relief, 1-little relief, 2-meaningful relief, 3-a lot of relief, 4-complete relief]. |
Every two hours from baseline to 6 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Scores at 2 Hours | SPID was calculated as sum of products of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120. Positive and higher scores indicate greater reduction in pain. SPIDt = ?PID x (timet - timet-1) Pain Intensity was assessed at baseline and at each time-point based on a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scale: 0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain. If the subject rated pain intensity as "2" or "3", pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from pain scores taken at baseline. |
Every two hours from baseline to 2 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | SPID Scores at 4 Hours | SPID was calculated as sum of products of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-240. Positive and higher scores indicate greater reduction in pain. SPIDt = ?PID x (timet - timet-1) Pain Intensity was assessed at baseline and at each time-point based on a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scale: 0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain. If the subject rated pain intensity as "2" or "3", pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from pain scores taken at baseline. |
Every two hours from baseline to 4 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | SPID Scores at 6 Hours | SPID was calculated as sum of products of Pain Intensity Differences (PID) at a given time-point (t) with the time-interval from that time-point to the previous time-point (t-1). The time-intervals used were 0-15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-240, 240-300 and 300-360. Positive and higher scores indicate greater reduction in pain. SPIDt = ?PID x (timet - timet-1) Pain Intensity was assessed at baseline and at each time-point based on a 4-point categorical Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scale: 0-no pain, 1-mild pain, 2-moderate pain, 3-severe pain. If the subject rated pain intensity as "2" or "3", pain was assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0 (no pain), 100 (worst pain)]. VAS scores were converted into PID scores by subtracting them from pain scores taken at baseline. |
Every two hours from baseline to 6 hours post dose | No |
Secondary | Participants Global Assessment to Response to Treatment (PGART) | PGART was measured by a score in a scale from 0-4: 0- Poor; 1- Fair 2- Good; 3- Very Good; 4- Excellent. | Baseline to 6 hours post dose | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT01512160 -
Efficacy Of Pf-04531083 In Treating Post-Surgical Dental Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01082081 -
Post-operative Dental Pain Study Comparing Analgesic Efficacy
|
Phase 4 |