View clinical trials related to Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.
Filter by:The aim of this study was to investigate whether NETs markers can enhance predict portal vein tumor thrombosis in patients with live cirrhosis, so as to establish a novel predictor to guide clinical decision-making.
Macrovascular invasion (MVI) is common in HCC, Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is the most common form of MVI in HCC, with an incidence ranging from 44 to 62.2%. About 10% to 60% of HCC patients have PVTT at the time of diagnosis. the prognosis for those with PVTT remains poor, as their median survival is only 2-4 months via supportive care. There is currently no widely-accepted consensus for the management of HCC with PVTT. According to some guidelines in Europe and America, HCC with PVTT is regarded as Stage C per Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Staging system, and sorafenib alone is recommended as the treatment of choice. This study is to analyze the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis.
The proposed study is an open-label, single-center, single arm phase 1b study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy plus sintilimab for HCC with PVTT.
The study is a multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-arm, Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of portal irradiation stent placement plus TACE compared to sorafenib plus TACE in patients with advanced HCC accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombosis. Patients will be randomized to receive either portal irradiation stent placement plus TACE(Arm A) or Sorafenib plus TACE (Arm B).
For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), the survival benefit of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains modest. This study aimed to investigate whether TACE in combination with irradiation stent placement (ISP) could prolong the survival in patients with HCC and PVTT.
This is a phase I/II dose-escalation study of lipotecan based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.
The standard treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sorafenib. Though the agent showed clear survival benefit in two randomized phase III trials, the benefit was modest and response rate was just a few percent. Therefore, other loco-regional modalities, like trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and radiotherapy (RT) were continuously tried, especially in locally advanced HCC including portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). With the advancement of conformal RT techniques, RT was actively applied in HCC, especially in PVTT combined HCC. Many researchers reported that there is a relationship between RT dose and tumor response rate. RT dose, however, is frequently limited because the complications (like radiation induced liver disease (RILD), radiation induced gastro-duodenal toxicity, etc.) are also closely related with higher exposed RT dose. Proton beam has characteristic depth-dose distribution contrast to photon, the "Bragg peak". The advantage of this dose distribution could be more highlighted in HCC management, because of the weakness and maintenance importance of liver function itself in HCC patients. In fact, the superior results of proton beam therapy in HCC were constantly reported in several groups as prospectively as well as retrospectively. In those background, the investigators planned the present study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy in HCC patients combined with PVTT.
The presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most significant prognostic factors for poor prognosis, without treatment, their survival is less than 3 months. In the HCC patients who combined with PVTT, Radiation therapy (RT) showed 50% of local control and about 10 months survival duration. Despite the standard treatment of the HCC combined with PVTT is sorafenib, but Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) recommend RT as an alternative option in those patients. Investigators previously reported the retrospective study that the scheduled interval Trans-catheter Arterial Chemo-embolization (TACE) followed by RT for HCC combined with PVTT and 60% of the patients showed objective response without significant elevation of complication. However, the prospective outcomes of TACE followed by RT for HCC are scantly reported. Based on those background, we start this prospective study to evaluate the clinical outcomes and adverse event in the RT after TACE in the unresectable HCC patients who combined with PVTT.