Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

1. Does primary stenting have a lower 12-month restenosis rate than PTA alone in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery?

- Alternative hypothesis: "Primary stenting with the Edwards LifeStent is associated with a lower restenosis rate than PTA alone in patients with atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery at 12 months"

- Null hypothesis: "Primary stenting with the Edwards LifeStent is not associated with a lower 12-month restenosis rate than PTA alone in patients with atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery""

2. Does comparison of the two intervention groups (PTA alone, stenting) disclose differences in terms of the secondary endpoints?

3. How do the intervention methods compare in terms of safety/incidence of adverse effects?

4. What are the long-term clinical implications of the two treatment methods?


Clinical Trial Description

n/a


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT00712309
Study type Interventional
Source Herz-Zentrums Bad Krozingen
Contact Thomas Zeller, MD
Phone 004976334024350
Email thomas.zeller@herzzentrum.de
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date February 2007

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT02648334 - Randomized Comparison of DCB for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Peripheral Artery Disease N/A