View clinical trials related to Polytrauma.
Filter by:This clinical trial aims to test the effectiveness of ELLASI intervention in response time, deterioration score, and metabolic status of polytrauma patients in the emergency department. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is the response time of polytrauma patients who receive ELLASI in the intervention group faster than the control group? 2. Is the deterioration score of polytrauma patients who receive ELLASI in the intervention group better than the control group? 3. Is the metabolic status of polytrauma patients who receive ELLASI in the intervention group better than the control group? Polytrauma patients in the intervention group will receive ELLASI, a structured intervention consisting of the six following: 1. Evaluation of airway and cervical control, remove the foreign body, fluid, etc., from the airway, 2. Patient positioning and giving oxygen, head-up, 3. Stabilisation, including IV insertion, applying pressure and bandage, place monitor, and haemodynamic monitoring 4. Assessment: re-assessment of pain and other main complaints 5. Make sure informed consents are documented 6. Inform patient and family for further intervention Polytrauma patients in the control group will receive the usual/standard intervention. Response time, early warning score, and arterial blood gas of polytrauma patients from both groups will be obtained and documented before and after the intervention.
The goal of this observational study is to develop a Clinical Decision Support System for severe patients with polytrauma. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is it possible to predict the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome for the next 24 h after admission? - Is it possible to predict the development of blood loss >25% of blood volume for the next 24 h after admission? - Is it possible to predict the development of acute traumatic coagulopathy for the next 24 h after admission? - Is it possible to predict the development of pneumonia in polytrauma patients? - Is it possible to predict the outcome in polytrauma patients? No intervention is planned for this study.
Temporary aortic occlusion can limit haemorrhage, can help to maintain perfusion to the heart and brain, and may be associated with improved survival. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) potentially provides a relatively quick means of achieving this temporary control. In the past years, studies have tried to evaluate the benefit for this method with conflicting results. The previous UK-REBOA trial has not found any benefit in the intervention group and has even hinted at possible harm caused by the intervention. A major limitation of this study is the low number of interventions performed in participating trauma centres and the associated potentially insufficient experience with REBOA. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of REBOA in a setting with already experienced providers.
Traumatic injuries, defined as a physical injury with sudden onset, are a leading cause to disability and impaired health. Persons who sustain a traumatic injury often report problems in daily life activities and reduced quality of life, which may limit participation in work/studies, leisure activities and family life. Consequently, complex rehabilitation and support is recommended in National Trauma guidelines due to the often long-lasting physical and psychological sequela of the injury. The main goal of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a self-management support program delivered to persons with a moderate or severe traumatic injury in the sub-acute phase of recovery (i.e. 3-4 months after injury). The self-management program aims to enhance patients' self-efficacy by building skills and self-management strategies to cope with injury-related consequences. The program has a group-based format and consists of eight sessions comprising psychoeducation, skill mastery and sharing of experiences. The participants who will be included in the study must be between 18 and 70 years, be residing in the southeast region of Norway, be admitted to Oslo University hospital or transferred from local hospital within 72 hours after injury, have at least a two-day hospital stay, and be able to read and understand Norwegian language. Participants will be randomly assigned to either intervention or control group. A group of patients will also be able to self-select if they want to receive the self-management support program or be in the control group. The latter is an explorative part of the study to evaluate the influence of patients' treatment-preferences on the study outcomes. Participants in the control group will receive treatment as usual.
Introduction: Injuries are a leading cause of mortality worldwide. It is necessary to know the incidence of injuries, mechanisms of wounds, therapy provided, and outcomes. Trauma registries are useful to describe the population served in specialized centers. Nevertheless, it is necessary also to identify the peculiarities of the event in the province and institutions non-dedicated to trauma attention. Objective: The study aims to describe the initial experience with a trauma register in a general hospital in the Colombian Orinoquia. Methodology: The investigators designed an observational retrospective study to analyze the admission database and revision of history charts of patients older than 15 years admitted for trauma from January to June 2023 in a hospital from Villavicencio, Colombia. The information will be exported to Excel for debugging and analysis. A description of the frequency and proportion of categorical variables will be performed; the central distribution and dispersion of quantitative variables will be reported. U of Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests will be used to compare the variables by outcome; a p<0.05 was selected as a significant value. Conclusions: It will be a pioneer study in this region, and it is necessary to evaluate the incidence of patients admitted by trauma, the mechanisms and type of injury, the care provided, and the outcomes.
The goal of this prospective study with the aim to establish a registry is to learn about the role of steroid hormones in severely injured patients. The main question it aims to answer is whether steroid hormones influence morbidity and mortality after severe trauma. This is a prospective study with the aim to establish a large registry for severely injured patients and their hormonal status. Hormone levels will be measured upon arrival in the emergency room and within the following few days after trauma. Furthermore a detailed questionnaire aims to answer any hormone-related health questions.
Rib fractures are the most frequent injury after blunt thoracic trauma. It is very important to choose the most appropriate interventions to prevent complications. But who will benefit most of those interventions remains a challenge. This study analyses the correlation between chest X-Ray and CT scan. We also analyse different scores to predict respiratory failure.
Trauma is defined as a physical injury from an external source of sudden onset and severity, which require immediate medical attention.Despite improvements in trauma systems worldwide, trauma continues to be one of the leading causes of death and disability in all age groups, especially the young and middle age group. For studying the outcomes of trauma, accurate and reliable methodological tools are required for appropriate scoring of severity and outcome prediction . Trauma scores were designed to facilitate the triage of patients in the ER (emergency room), and identify patients with Polytrauma with low chances of survival. Those scores were meant to organize and improve the quality of trauma care systems, and to assess resources allocation.3 12 In 1969, Researchers developed the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) to grade the severity of individual injuries. Attempting to summarize injury severity in patients with multiple traumas with a single number is almost difficult; therefore, multiple alternative scoring systems were proposed afterwards, each with its own problems and limitations. More than 50 scoring systems have been published for the classification of trauma patients in the field, emergency room, and intensive care settings. There are three main groups of trauma scores: (a) Anatomical, (b) Physiological, (c) Combined scores. Anatomical scores describe all the injuries recorded by clinical examination, imaging, surgery or autopsy and measure lesion severity. Physiological scores describe changes happened due to the trauma, and translated by changes in vital signs and consciousness. Scores that include both anatomical and physiological criteria (mixed scores) are more useful for patient prognosis
The use of the conditioning open-label placebo (COLP) paradigm will be studied as a dose extension method to lower opioid dosage in patients with spinal cord injury, polytrauma, and burn injury. The goal is to provide the same level of pain relief with a reduced opioid intake to diminish side effects as well as the risk of addiction associated with opioid treatment.
The analgesic effect of continuous mid-point to pleura transverse process block compared to the analgesic effect of continuous thoracic intervertebral foramen block, in patients with multiple rib fractures.