Poliomyelitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Assessing the Intestinal and Humoral Immunity of Sequential Schedules of Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine and Bivalent Oral Poliovirus Vaccine for Routine Childhood Immunization in Bangladesh
This is a phase IV open-label randomized clinical trial that will compare intestinal and humoral immunity in infants receiving inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) and two or three doses of bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV).
The goal of polio vaccination is to protect the individual from paralytic disease (humoral
immunity) and to prevent transmission of poliovirus (intestinal immunity). Inactivated
poliovirus vaccine (IPV) induces humoral (systemic) immunity to all three types of
poliovirus (1, 2 and 3), protecting individuals from developing paralytic polio when exposed
to wild type poliovirus. However, it induces little intestinal immunity. Intestinal immunity
inhibits poliovirus replication thereby reducing the quantity and duration of poliovirus
excretion in stool. This is critical in preventing the spread of poliovirus to others.
Oral polio vaccines are live attenuated vaccines and trivalent OPV (tOPV) is a mixture of
poliovirus strains type 1, 2 and 3. Like IPV, OPV induces humoral immunity and is more
effective than IPV at inducing intestinal immunity. In most developing countries, routine
childhood immunization for poliovirus consists of three doses of tOPV at 6, 10 and 14 weeks
of age and may also include a birth dose of tOPV.
An important limitation is that the vaccine virus in OPV can mutate and acquire
neurovirulence causing paralysis either due to vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) or
due to circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs), in which the attenuated vaccine
virus not only acquires the ability to cause paralysis but can also circulate similarly to
wild poliovirus (WPV). The potential of vaccine virus to acquire neurovirulence and cause
paralytic poliomyelitis is incompatible with eradication of polio. Therefore, polio
eradication will require eventual cessation of all OPVs.
The last case of WPV type 2 was reported in 1999 in India. Type 2 vaccine virus in tOPV is
most likely to cause cVDPVs and over 80% of cVDPVs over the past decade have been cVDPV2. Of
the estimated 250-500 annual VAPP cases, almost 40% are due to type 2. Thus, with the
eradication of WPV2 it is imperative to prioritize removal of type 2 containing OPV.
The licensing and availability of bOPV containing type 1 and 3 offers the option of an OPV
that does not contain OPV2. In April 2013, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on
Immunization (SAGE) recommended phased cessation of OPVs starting with the switch from tOPV
to bOPV. After the switch, bOPV is expected to be administered at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age,
the typical routine poliovirus immunization schedule in developing countries for tOPV.
Additionally, at least one dose of IPV was recommended to prevent rapid rise in type 2
susceptibility in the birth cohorts born after the switch to bOPV.
The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) has advocated for administration of at least
one dose of IPV and delaying the dose to 14 weeks of age to decrease interference by
maternal antibodies and provide the highest seroconversion possible with a single dose of
IPV in the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) schedule. The GPEI position of introducing
only one dose of IPV at 14 weeks of age is principally based on findings from a trial in
Cuba that reported type 2 seroconversion of 63% with a single dose of IPV given at 16 weeks
of age. The current schedule of Bangladesh is tOPV at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age with IPV
also at 14 weeks of age.
As a result of the addition of IPV to the routine immunization schedule, children will
receive four doses of the polio vaccine (three bOPV and one IPV) but are four doses
necessary? Could IPV administered with a reduced number of bOPV doses still lead to
protective levels of humoral and intestinal immunity? Previous studies in the US and UK
suggest that two doses of OPV given with one or two doses of IPV induces protective levels
of humoral and intestinal immunity comparable to three doses of tOPV. Furthermore, a recent
study in Bangladesh found that there were no significant differences in type 1 or 3
seroconversion proportions among children on a three-dose bOPV schedule versus a fractional
IPV (f-IPV)/bOPV schedule (two f-IPV, one bOPV). Although there were significant differences
in vaccine virus excretion among children who received only bOPV compared to f-IPV/bOPV to
type 1 and 3, this difference could have been diminished if a second dose of bOPV was given
instead of f-IPV .
In addition, there has been interest in whether a VAPP-protective schedule could mount
protective levels of immunity in individuals. A VAPP-protective schedule is the
administration of IPV as the first dose of poliovirus vaccination. The risk of VAPP is
highest with the first dose of OPV and diminishes with subsequent OPV administrations. There
is no risk of VAPP when IPV is given as the first dose because the vaccine uses killed
virus. The rationale behind the VAPP-protective schedule is that individuals would have
prior exposure to types 1, 2, and 3 through IPV before their first bOPV administration,
thereby decreasing the risk for VAPP.
Investigators of this trial will assess if a reduced number of bOPV doses given with a dose
of IPV confers a protective level of immunity against polio by examining the intestinal and
humoral immunity induced by two different bOPV/IPV VAPP-protective sequential schedules
among infants in Bangladesh. Specially, investigators will examine the proportion of
seroconversion and vaccine virus excretion in children who receive an IPV dose at 6 weeks of
age and bOPV at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age in comparison to children who receive an IPV dose
at 6 weeks of age and bOPV only at 10 and 14 weeks of age.
Setting: Mirpur is a suburb of Dhaka with a population of about one million in an area of 59
square kilometers. Mirpur Thana of Dhaka city is divided into 14 sections. Mirpur is about 8
kilometers from icddr,b's Dhaka Hospital.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04989231 -
An Immunity Persistence Study of Sabin Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine(Vero Cell) After Four Doses
|
||
Completed |
NCT00352963 -
Immunogenicity & Safety Study of Combined/Separate Vaccine(s) Against Common Diseases in Infants (2,4,6 Months of Age).
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03890497 -
Assessment of Poliovirus Type 2 Immunogenicity of One and Two Dose Schedule With IPV and fIPV When Administered at 9-13 Months of Age in Bangladesh
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00753649 -
Immunogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals' Infanrix Hexa in Infants
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04693286 -
Clinical Trial of Novel OPV2 Vaccine
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02847026 -
Fractional Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Booster and Rotavirus Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02189811 -
Polio End-game Strategies - Poliovirus Type 2 Challenge Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01444781 -
Study of the Booster Effect of DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP~T Combined Vaccine or Infanrix Hexa™ and Prevenar™ in Healthy Infants
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01214889 -
Study of PENTAXIM™ Vaccine Versus TETRAXIM™ Vaccine Given With ACTHIB™ Vaccine in South Korean Infants.
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00879827 -
Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of GSK Bio DTPa-HBV-IPV and Hib Vaccines When Coadministered to Healthy Infants
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01457495 -
Immunogenicity and Safety of DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib Compared to DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV Administered Concomitantly
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02853929 -
Evaluation of Immunogenicity and Safety of a Booster Dose of Infanrix Hexa™ in Healthy Infants Born to Mothers Vaccinated With Boostrix™ During Pregnancy or Immediately Post-delivery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03614702 -
Clinic Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity by Different Sequential Schedules of bOPV and IPV
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT04063150 -
Immunogenicity of Intramuscular and Intradermal IPV
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04614597 -
A Study on Immunity Duration Against Polio Over 18 Months Infants After 2 or 3 Primary Doses Sabin IPV in China
|
||
Completed |
NCT03239496 -
A Study to Evaluate Immunogenicity of Intramuscular Full-Dose and Intradermal Fractional Dose of IPV
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04544787 -
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Two Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Candidates
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02985320 -
Studies of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Sabin Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02291263 -
Immunogenicity of Intramuscular Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02274285 -
DTaP-IPV/Hib Vaccine Primary & Booster Vaccinations Versus Co-administration of DTaP-IPV and Hib Vaccine in Japanese Infants
|
Phase 3 |