Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02690688
Other study ID # HL-2016-Monitoring
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received February 18, 2016
Last updated February 18, 2016
Start date March 2016
Est. completion date July 2017

Study information

Verified date February 2016
Source University of Luebeck
Contact Matthias Heringlake, MD
Phone 0049/451/500-2772
Email matthias.heringlake@uksh.de
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Germany: Ethics Commission
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Dynamic preload variables like pulse-pressure and stroke volume variation may be used to predict fluid responsiveness in patients during controlled ventilation. Previous work has shown that a rapid decrease in intra-abdominal pressure may lead to an increase in dynamic preload parameters, suggestive of a fluid deficit - despite fluid status had not changed [van Lavieren M 2014].

The results of this study are limited by the fact that a non-invasive and uncalibrated hemodynamic monitoring system (Nexfin™) was used.

The present study thus aims to evaluate the effects of abdominal pressure changes on dynamic preload parameters (PPV and SVV) employing conventional, invasive hemodynamic monitoring (Vigileo®, Edwards Lifescience) in open abdominal surgery as well as in minimal invasive surgical procedures with pneumoperitoneum.


Description:

Hemodynamic monitoring is an essential part of modern anesthesia. Establishing and maintaining normovolemia during surgery is of high clinical relevance. Various studies suggest that dynamic preload parameters like stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PVV) are superior for interpretation and management of fluid status than static parameters like central venous pressure (CVP). Consequently, dynamic preload parameters have been integrated in recent guidelines for hemodynamic and fluid management.

Animal studies have shown reliable results for SVV and PVV to discriminate fluid-responder from non-responders if intraabdominal pressure is increased [Jacques D 2011]. In contrast to these findings, van Lavieren and colleagues have shown an inappropriate increase in measured dynamic preload parameters upon opening the abdomen using a non-invasive and uncalibrated system (Nexfin™). The present study thus aims to determine the effects of changes in abdominal pressure on dynamic preload parameters (PPV and SVV) (primary objective) employing an established invasive hemodynamic monitoring tool (Vigileo®, Edwards Lifescience) during open abdominal surgery as well as in minimal invasive surgical procedures using pneumoperitoneum.

Secondary objective is the effect of changes of cerebral oximetry readings during open and laparoscopic procedures and their relation to changes in cardiac index.

Elective ASA I-III patients scheduled for open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery will be enrolled according the planned operative procedure (open abdominal surgery or minimal invasive surgical procedures using pneumoperitoneum) and assignment. 60 patients (30/group) will be included according to a sample size calculation based on the data by van Lavieren.

Prior to induction of anesthesia an invasive blood pressure monitoring (radial artery) will be established and connected to a Vigileo® monitor (Edwards Lifescience). Additionally, bilateral optodes for the monitoring of cerebral oxygenation will be applied (INVOS, Somanetics). Ventilation, anesthesia and fluid management will be standardized.

Hemodynamic variables will be recorded prior to induction of anesthesia, after anesthesia was induced, and at the initial time point of pneumoperitoneum/open abdomen.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date July 2017
Est. primary completion date March 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- ASA I-III patient

- Signed agreement

- Surgical procedure with open abdomen surgery or pneumperitoneum

- Age > 18 Years

- Intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

- BMI = 35 kg/m2

- Need for catecholamines

- Cardiac arrhythmia

- Fluid resuscitation during measurements

- Ongoing periduralcatheter-therapy

- Missing agreement

- Disposition for MH

- Inclusion in other investigations < 30 days

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
determination of dynamic preload variables


Locations

Country Name City State
Germany Department of Anesthesiology, University of Luebeck Luebeck

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Luebeck

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

References & Publications (2)

Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, Colling J, Piriou V, Viale JP. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R33. doi: 10.1186/cc9980. Epub 2011 Jan 19. — View Citation

van Lavieren M, Veelenturf J, Hofhuizen C, van der Kolk M, van der Hoeven J, Pickkers P, Lemson J, Lansdorp B. Dynamic preload indicators decrease when the abdomen is opened. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Oct 14;14:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-90. eCollection 2014. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Influence of pneumoperitoneum or open abdominal surgery on dynamic preload parameters Mesurements during one minute after induction of pneumoperitoneum or open abdominal surgery No
Secondary Influence of pneumoperitoneum or open abdominal surgery on cerebral oxymetry Mesurements during one minute after induction of pneumoperitoneum or open abdominal surgery No
Secondary Correlation of cerebral oxymetry and cadiac index in pneumoperitoneum or open abdominal surgery Mesurements during one minute after induction of pneumoperitoneum or open abdominal surgery No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT06075836 - AI Assisted Detection of Chest X-Rays
Completed NCT03608436 - The Effect of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on Early Quality of Recovery Phase 4
Completed NCT03572413 - The Effect of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on Innate Immune Homeostasis. Phase 4
Completed NCT04146090 - Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT02853591 - Comparison of Pneumoinsufflation Modes and Pressure Settings in Gynecology N/A
Completed NCT03576118 - Moderate vs Deep Neuromuscular Block on Biotrauma During Laparoscopy N/A
Completed NCT02079337 - Validation of Subjective Rating Scales Used to Assess Surgical Conditions in Abdominal Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT01512511 - Comparing Nitrous Oxide and Carbon Dioxide for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06116383 - Evaluation of Renal Perfusion With NIRS in Laparoscopic Surgery
Withdrawn NCT03933254 - Intraocular Pressure and Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Changes in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies
Recruiting NCT03069586 - Effect Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum and Pulmonary Recruitment on Postoperative Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT01867814 - Arterial and Plethysmographic Waveforms Variables as Predictors of Hemodynamic Response to Pneumoperitoneum N/A
Terminated NCT01854307 - The Influence of Pneumoperitoneum on Minimal Invasive Cardiac Output Measurements N/A
Completed NCT05992636 - Different Insufflation Flows and Effects on Cerebral Oxygenation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Completed NCT03957837 - Optical Nerve Sheath Changes During Head Down Laparoscopy
Recruiting NCT06319053 - The Turbine-based Insufflator Safety and Feasibility Study N/A
Completed NCT04125173 - Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy N/A
Completed NCT05238506 - Lidocaine VS Hemodynamic, Metabolic and Hormonal Response Phase 4
Completed NCT03928171 - The Effect of Intra-abdominal Pressure on Peritoneal Perfusion During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery N/A
Completed NCT05367557 - Comparison of Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters and Arterial-blood Gas Changes at Two Different Pneumoperitoneal Pressure Values