Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05272150
Other study ID # CR109163
Secondary ID CNTO1959PSO3018
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date July 13, 2022
Est. completion date July 10, 2025

Study information

Verified date June 2024
Source Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment versus placebo in skin of color participants with predominant moderate-to-severe body psoriasis or predominant moderate-to-severe scalp psoriasis by assessing improvements in the signs and symptoms of psoriasis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 213
Est. completion date July 10, 2025
Est. primary completion date July 9, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Have a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis [PsA]) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug - Self-identify as non-white or non-caucasian - Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis - Have an involved body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=) 10 percent (%), psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12, investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and at baseline (Cohort A), or have a scalp surface area >=30%, psoriasis scalp severity index (PSSI) >=12, scalp specific investigator global assessment (ss-IGA) >=3, and one plaque outside of the scalp at screening and at baseline (Cohort B) - Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 12 weeks after the last administration of study intervention - Agree not to receive a Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination during the study, and within 12 weeks after the last administration of study intervention Exclusion Criteria: - Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example: erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) - Has received ustekinumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, or brodalumab within 12 weeks of first dose of study drug - Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances - Participant has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to guselkumab or its excipients - Has or has had a serious infection (example: sepsis, pneumonia or pyelonephritis), or has been hospitalized or received intravenous antibiotics for an infection during the 2 months before screening

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Guselkumab
Participants will receive guselkumab as subcutaneous injection.
Placebo
Participants will receive placebo as subcutaneous injection.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada CCA Medical Research Corporation Ajax Ontario
Canada Beacon Dermatology Calgary Alberta
Canada Dermatology Research Institute Inc. Calgary Alberta
Canada Alberta DermaSurgery Centre Edmonton Alberta
Canada Dr Dusan Sajic Medicine Professional Corporation Guelph Ontario
Canada Lynderm Research Inc. Markham Ontario
Canada North York Research Inc North York Ontario
Canada JRB Research Inc Ottawa Ontario
Canada Nectar Research Group Inc Richmond Hill Ontario
Canada Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Surrey British Columbia
Canada Dr. Lorne E. Albrecht Surrey British Columbia
Canada Canadian Dermatology Center Toronto Ontario
Canada FACET Dermatology Toronto Ontario
Canada Research Toronto Toronto Ontario
Canada Toronto Research Centre Toronto Ontario
United States Hamilton Dermatology Atlanta Dermatology, Vein & Research Center, LLC Alpharetta Georgia
United States David Fivenson MD, Dermatology Ann Arbor Michigan
United States Arlington Center for Dermatology Arlington Texas
United States Advanced Medical Research Atlanta Georgia
United States Allcutis Research Beverly Massachusetts
United States Stoll Dermatology Beverly Hills California
United States Cahaba Research Inc Birmingham Alabama
United States Total Skin & Beauty Dermatology Center Birmingham Alabama
United States Advanced Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center Boardman Ohio
United States Skin Care Research Boca Raton Florida
United States Metro Boston Clinical Partners Brighton Massachusetts
United States Accellacare Research of Cary Cary North Carolina
United States Dermatology and Laser Center of Charleston Charleston South Carolina
United States Darst Dermatology Charlotte North Carolina
United States Dermatology Specialists Charlotte North Carolina
United States Driven Research LLC Coral Gables Florida
United States Florida Academic Dermatology Centers Coral Gables Florida
United States Dermatology Treatment & Research Center, PA Dallas Texas
United States Modern Research Associates PLLC Dallas Texas
United States University Dermatology and Vein Clinic Darien Illinois
United States Wright State Physicians Health Center Dayton Ohio
United States Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey East Windsor New Jersey
United States California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute Encinitas California
United States Schweiger Dermatology Group Exton Pennsylvania
United States University of Connecticut Health Center Farmington Connecticut
United States Forest Hills Dermatology Group PLLC Forest Hills New York
United States Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC Fountain Inn South Carolina
United States First OC Dermatology Fountain Valley California
United States Center for Dermatology Clinical Research Fremont California
United States Community Regional Medical Center Fresno California
United States Callender Center for Clinical Research Glenn Dale Maryland
United States Hudson Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center Hoboken New Jersey
United States Hollywood Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery Hollywood Florida
United States Center for Clinical Studies Houston Texas
United States Suzanne Bruce and Associates - The Center for Skin Research Houston Texas
United States Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group Indianapolis Indiana
United States Paul Wallace MD Ladera Heights California
United States The Grimes Center for Medical and Aesthetic Dermatology Los Angeles California
United States Ds Research Louisville Kentucky
United States Skin Care Physicians of Georgia Macon Georgia
United States Care Access Research Marriottsville Maryland
United States Apex Dermatology Mayfield Heights Mayfield Heights Ohio
United States International Dermatology Research, Inc. Miami Florida
United States Twin Cities Dermatology Center Minneapolis Minnesota
United States Markowitz Medical OptiSkin New York New York
United States MDCS Dermatology New York New York
United States Sadick Research Group New York New York
United States Care Access Research Newport Beach California
United States Central Sooner Research Norman Oklahoma
United States Tory P. Sullivan, M.D., PA North Miami Beach Florida
United States Skin Specialists Omaha Nebraska
United States Park Avenue Dermatology Orange Park Florida
United States Epiphany Dermatology of Kansas, LLC Overland Park Kansas
United States Riverchase Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery Pembroke Pines Florida
United States Austin Institute for Clinical Research Pflugerville Texas
United States Temple University School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Indiana Clinical Trial Center Plainfield Indiana
United States Accellacare of Raleigh Raleigh North Carolina
United States DermAssociates, PC Rockville Maryland
United States Lawrence J Green MD LLC Rockville Maryland
United States PMG Research of Rocky Mount, LLC Rocky Mount North Carolina
United States St Joseph Dermatology and Vein Clinic Saint Joseph Michigan
United States GCP Research Saint Petersburg Florida
United States Progressive Clinical Research San Antonio Texas
United States Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists San Antonio Texas
United States MedDerm Associates San Diego California
United States Synergy Clinical Research San Francisco California
United States Southern California Dermatology Santa Ana California
United States Clinical Science Institute Santa Monica California
United States Northshore University Healthsystem Skokie Illinois
United States Forcare Clinical Research Inc Tampa Florida
United States Somerset Skin Centre Troy Michigan
United States Schweiger Dermatology Group Verona New Jersey
United States Center for Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery Washington District of Columbia
United States Henry Ford Medical Center West Bloomfield Michigan
United States Dundee Dermatology West Dundee Illinois
United States PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC Wilmington North Carolina
United States Wake Forest Health Sciences Winston-Salem North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Cohort A: Percentage of Participants who Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16 A PASI 90 response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 90 percent (%) improvement in PASI score from baseline. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Week 16
Primary Cohort A: Percentage of Participants who Achieve an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 Percentage of participants with IGA score of 0 (cleared) or 1 (minimal) will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Week 16
Primary Cohort B: Percentage of Participants who Achieve Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 Response at Week 16 A PSSI 90 response is defined as >=90% reduction in PSSI score from baseline. The PSSI measures the extent of psoriasis involvement and the severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation of the scalp. Involved scalp area is measured on a scale from 0 (0% of scalp involved) to 6 (90-100% of scalp involved), clinical symptoms are each rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (severest possible). Involvement and severity of psoriasis for the PSSI is scored by physicians using a scale from 0 to 72, where 0=no psoriasis, and higher scores indicating more severe disease. Week 16
Primary Cohort B: Percentage of Participants who Achieve Scalp-specific Investigator Global Assessment (ss-IGA) Score of Absence of Disease (0) or Very Mild Disease (1) at Week 16 Percentage of participants with ss-IGA score 0 (absence of disease) or 1 (very mild disease) will be reported. The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: absence of disease (0), very mild disease (1), mild disease (2), moderate disease (3), and severe disease (4). Week 16
Secondary Cohort A: Percentage of Participants who Achieve IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16 Percentage of participants with IGA score 0 (cleared) will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Week 16
Secondary Cohort A: Percentage of Participants who Achieve PASI 100 Response at Week 16 A PASI 100 response is defined as 100% improvement in PASI score from baseline. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Week 16
Secondary Cohort A: Change from Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16 Change from baseline in PASI score at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The individual scores are multiplied by a weighted factor for each body region; the sum of these scores gives the total PASI score. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Cohort A: Change from Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16 Change from baseline in BSA at Week 16 will be reported. The BSA is a measurement of involved skin over the whole body. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis is estimated based on the participant's handprint (defined as the entire palmar surface of the hand including fingers). Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Cohort A: Time to >=90% Reduction in PASI Score Time to >=90% reduction in PASI score will be reported which is defined as time to achieve >=90% improvement in PASI. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Up to Week 16
Secondary Cohorts A and B: Change from Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16 Change from baseline in DLQI score at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific quality of life instrument designed to assess the impact of dermatologic disease on a participant's quality of life (QoL). It is a 10 item patient-reported outcome(s) (PRO) questionnaire that, in addition to evaluating overall QoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect QoL: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The DLQI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Cohort A: Percentage of Participants who Achieve >= 4-point Reduction (Improvement) from Baseline in the Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Itch Score at Week 16, Among Participants with Baseline PSSD Itch >= 4 at Baseline Percentage of participants who achieve >=4-point reduction (improvement) from baseline in PSSD itch score at Week 16 among participants with baseline PSSD itch >=4 at baseline will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaires designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefits. The participants are asked to answer the questions thinking about either the last 24 hours (24-hour recall version) or the last 7 days (7 days recall version). Both versions include 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two subscores will be derived, each ranging from 0-100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Week 16
Secondary Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants who Achieve a PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16, Among Randomized Participants with Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >=1 Percentage of participants who achieve a PSSD symptom score of 0 at Week 16 among randomized participants with baseline PSSD symptom score >=1 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaires designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefits. The participants are asked to answer the questions thinking about either the last 24 hours (24-hour recall version) or the last 7 days (7 days recall version). Both versions include 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two subscores will be derived, each ranging from 0-100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Week 16
Secondary Cohorts A and B: Change from Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16 Change from baseline in PSSD symptom score at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaires designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefits. The participants are asked to answer the questions thinking about either the last 24 hours (24-hour recall version) or the last 7 days (7 days recall version). Both versions include 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two subscores will be derived, each ranging from 0-100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Cohort B: Percentage of Participants who Achieve ss-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) at Week 16 Percentage of participants with ss-IGA score 0 (absence of disease) will be reported. The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: absence of disease (0), very mild disease (1), mild disease (2), moderate disease (3), and severe disease (4). Week 16
Secondary Cohort B: Change from Baseline in Scalp Surface Area (SSA) at Week 16 Change from baseline in SSA at Week 16 will be reported. The SSA is a measurement of involved skin on the scalp. The overall SSA affected by psoriasis will be estimated based on the participant's thumb. Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Cohort B: Percentage of Participants who Achieve PSSI 100 Response at Week 16 A PSSI 100 response is defined as 100% reduction in PSSI score from baseline. The PSSI measures the extent of psoriasis involvement and the severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation of the scalp. Involved scalp area is measured on a scale from 0 (0% of scalp involved) to 6 (90-100% of scalp involved), clinical symptoms are each rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (severest possible). Involvement and severity of psoriasis for the PSSI is scored by physicians using a scale from 0 to 72, where 0=no psoriasis, and higher scores indicating more severe disease. Week 16
Secondary Cohort B: Change from Baseline in PSSI Score at Week 16 Change from baseline in PSSI score at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSI measures the extent of psoriasis involvement and the severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation of the scalp. Involved scalp area is measured on a scale from 0 (0% of scalp involved) to 6 (90-100% of scalp involved), clinical symptoms are each rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (severest possible).The PSSI total score is a composite score derived from the sum of the scores for erythema, induration and desquamation multiplied by the score for the extent of scalp area involved (percent of scalp involved). Involvement and severity of psoriasis for the PSSI is scored by physicians using a scale from 0 to 72, where 0=no psoriasis, and higher scores indicating more severe disease. Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Cohort B: Time to >=90% Reduction in PSSI Score Time to >=90% reduction in PSSI score will be reported which is defined as time to achieve >=90% improvement in PSSI. The PSSI measures the extent of psoriasis involvement and the severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation of the scalp. Involvement and severity of psoriasis for the PSSI is scored by physicians using a scale from 0 to 72, where 0=no psoriasis, and higher scores indicating more severe disease. Up to Week 16
Secondary Cohort B: Percentage of Participants with >= 4 Point Reduction (Improvement) from Baseline in the Scalp Itch NRS Score at Week 16, Among Participants with Baseline Scalp Itch >=4 at Baseline Percentage of participants with >=4 point reduction (improvement) from baseline in scalp itch NRS score, among participants with scalp itch >=4 at baseline will be reported. The scalp itch NRS is a single-item scale that asks participants to rate the severity of their scalp itching due to psoriasis by considering their worst level of itching over the past 24 hours. The participants will be asked to assess scalp itch and select a number on a scale of 0-10, where "0" represents no scalp itch, and "10" represents the worst imaginable scalp itch. Week 16
Secondary Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. Up to Week 116
Secondary Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) SAE is an adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product or medically important. Up to Week 116
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01194219 - Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Apremilast (CC-10004) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06030076 - A Study to Assess the Effects of Switching From a Biologic Treatment to Tildrakizumab Using Patient-reported Outcomes in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Completed NCT04263610 - Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Who Are Non-Responders to Dimethyl Fumarate Therapy Phase 4
Completed NCT02601469 - Study to Assess the Potential for Adrenal Suppression Following Treatment With DSXS in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT05600036 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ESK-001 in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT05375955 - A Study to Learn About The Study Medicine (PF-07038124) In Patients With Mild To Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Or Mild To Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Phase 2
Completed NCT03614078 - A Study of PRCL-02 in Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05036889 - A 16-week Randomized Evaluation of the Impact of Mind.Px Application on Response to Biologic Treatment in Patients Suffering From Plaque Psoriasis Through Clinical Utility and Health Outcomes. N/A
Completed NCT04603027 - A Phase 2 Study Investigating the Effect of EDP1815 in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT03638258 - The Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of ARQ-151 Cream in Subjects With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT02881346 - Efficacy and Tolerability of Enstilar® in Daily Practice
Recruiting NCT02611349 - Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of IDP-118 Lotion in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis Phase 3
Completed NCT02251678 - Evaluate the Effect of Elimune Capsules Phase 1
Completed NCT01987843 - Dose-finding Study of MT-1303 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Terminated NCT01708629 - Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab Compared With Placebo and Ustekinumab in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Subjects Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT00747032 - To Demonstrate the Superior Efficacy of NYC 0462 Ointment Over That of the Placebo in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis Phase 3
Completed NCT01230138 - Pivotal Efficacy and Safety Registration Trial of FP187 in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT00581100 - Effects of Etanercept on Nail Psoriasis and Plaque Psoriasis Phase 4
Suspended NCT01228656 - Effectiveness of Association Mometasone Furoate 0.1% and Salicylic Acid 5% Compared With Mometasone Furoate Phase 2
Completed NCT00540618 - A Phase II Study of MEDI-507, Administered by Injection to Adults With Psoriasis Phase 2