Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00328991
Other study ID # 3482-A
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received May 22, 2006
Last updated May 22, 2006
Start date October 2004
Est. completion date December 2005

Study information

Verified date January 2006
Source Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Federal Government
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is a double-blinded, controlled clinical intervention trial to evaluate the efficacy of duct tape occlusions therapy for the treatment of common warts. 80 patients completed this study, and were randomized 1:1 to receive pads which contained either moleskin+transparent duct tape or moleskin alone. The patients wore the pad over the target wart for 7 days at a time, removed the pad on the evening of the 7th day, and replaced the pad on the 8th day. This cycle was repeated for 8 weeks or until the wart resolved. The hypothesis was that duct tape occlusion therapy would be more therapeutic than moleskin for the treatment of the common wart. However, in our study there was only 21% resolution rate in the duct tape arm vs. 22% in the control group.


Description:

ABSTRACT (233 word count)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of duct tape occlusion therapy for the treatment of common warts.

Design: A double-blinded, controlled, clinical intervention trial. Setting: Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Participants: A total of 90 immunocompetent adult volunteers with at least one wart measuring between 2-15 mm were enrolled in this study between October 2004 and July 2005; 80 patients completed the study.

Intervention: Patients were randomized using a computer-generated code to receive either pads consisting of moleskin with transparent duct tape (active) or moleskin alone (control). Patients were instructed to wear the pads for 7 consecutive days and leave the pad off on the 7th evening. This process was repeated for 2 months or until the wart resolved, whichever occurred first. Follow-up visits occurred at 1 and 2 months.

Main Outcome Measure: 100% resolution of the wart. Secondary outcomes included change in size of the target wart and recurrence rates at 6 months for warts with complete resolution.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients with resolution of the target wart (duct tape=8/39, 21% vs. control=9/41, 22%). Of patients with complete resolution, 75% (6/8) in the duct tape group and 33% (3/9) of those in the control group had recurrence of the target wart by the sixth month.

Conclusions: Occlusive therapy with transparent duct tape is not significantly better than moleskin alone for treatment of common warts in adults.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 90
Est. completion date December 2005
Est. primary completion date
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:1) ability to comprehend and provide informed consent; 2) age greater than 18 years old; and 3) at least one common wart, measuring 2-15 millimeters in diameter.

Exclusion Criteria: 1) pregnant or lactating females; 2) treatment of the target wart within the past four weeks by any modality; 3) immunodeficiency state (cancer chemotherapy, systemic steroids, genetic immunodeficiency, transplant status, etc.); 4) genital wart only; 5) a history of hypersensitivity or allergy to adhesive tape; 6) documented allergy to latex; and/or 7) participation in another interventional study or use of any investigational drug within 30 days prior to enrollment.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Double-Blind, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Device:
duct tape occlusion therapy


Locations

Country Name City State
United States Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center Minneapolis Minnesota

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center Minnesota Medical Foundation, VA Office of Research and Development

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary 100% resolution of target wart
Secondary Change in size of target wart and recurrence of target wart at 6 months.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05324904 - Intralesional Vitamin D3 Versus Intralesional Acyclovir in Treatment of Plantar Warts N/A
Completed NCT05592041 - Studying of Natural Constituents' Treatment of Plantar Warts Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05115669 - Safety & Effectiveness of Wortie Freeze Plus in Common and Plantar Warts N/A
Recruiting NCT06261684 - Intralesional Acyclovir Versus Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Plantar Warts. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phase 2/Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT05057663 - Intralesional Treatment of Plantar Wart N/A
Recruiting NCT02151630 - Pyruvic Acid Versus Salicylic Acid Preparation in Treatment of Plantar Warts Phase 2/Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT04823845 - Plantar Wart Treatment Using Adapalene Gel Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05588999 - Comparative Study Between Treatment With Cryotherapy Alone Versus Cryotherapy Plus Salicylic Acid Dressing for Planter Warts Phase 1
Completed NCT01536834 - Safety & Performance Study of Verruca Treatment Device N/A
Recruiting NCT05488860 - Piezoelectric Drived Microneedling in Treating Refractory Skin Diseases N/A
Recruiting NCT05520658 - Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intralesional Injection of Combined Digoxin and Furosemide Versus 5 - Fluorouracil in Treatment of Plantar Warts N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04654091 - Cryotherapy VS. Nitric-zinc Complex in the Treatment of Plantar Warts. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05599971 - Intralesional Injection of Combined Digoxin and Furosemide Versus 5-Flurouracil in Plantar Warts N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05198180 - Treatment of Plantar Warts Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06214559 - Evaluate the Effectiveness and the Safety of a Medical Device in the Treatment of Common Warts and Plantar Warts. N/A
Recruiting NCT03977753 - Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of 2LVERU®JUNIOR and 2LVERU® on the Treatment of Warts Phase 4
Completed NCT03183765 - Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine Versus Cryotherapy in Treatment of Multiple Common and Planter Warts Phase 4