Pit and Fissure Sealant Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of the Retention of a Sealant Based on Flowable Resin With Sprg and Another Based on Flowable Resin in First Permanent Molars:Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in 12 Months
Objective: Determine which of the two sealants has better retention during the periods of 6, 9 and 12 months, one based on flowable resin with sprg or the other only based on flowable resin and we have the following hypothesis: the retention of the sealant based on a flowable resin with sprg is greater than a sealant based on a flowable resin in permanent first molars at different periods ". Materials and methods: 60 children from the school in the district of Pichanaki, Peru and aged 6 to 8 years were included in this study. The Split mouth design will be adopted, and 120 permanent first molars are designated.It will be applied on the upper / lower first molars with sealant material being the order assigned according to the previous randomization, for the intervention group they will be sealed based on flowable resin with sprg (giomer F03 beautifil-Shofu) in association with a bottle of adhesive (single bond) and on the contralateral side the upper / lower first molars will be sealed, the control group will be sealed with a flowable resin-based resin compound (Tetric N-Flow ivoclar vivadent) in association with a bottle of adhesive (Single Bond). Placement of materials on the right / left side of the mouth will be randomly assigned following block randomization procedures with a 1:1 allocation using the random block sizes of 4 and 8 (35).A computerized random number generator will be used. A total of 120 upper / lower molar teeth will be sealed with both materials (60 teeth for each material). The materials will be placed by the same operator according to the protocol of UNMSM for the sealing of pits and deep fissures; then, the interventional group will be compared after a 12-month follow-up with controls at 6, 9 and 12 months. The statistical analysis will be with SPSS software 20.0. Since all the data in this study will be categorical, nonparametric statistics will be used. Expected result: After the evaluation period it is expected to find significant differences in the retention of the sealant to flowable resin base with sprg (giomer F03 beautifil -Shofu) and sealant based on flowable resin (Tetric N- Flow ivoclar vivadent) using an adhesive system . Conclusion: Identify and quantify the retention of a sealant based on flowable resin with sprg (giomer F03 Beautifil -Shofu) and a sealant based on flowable resin (Tetric N-Flow ivoclar vivadent) using an adhesive system on 12 months.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | August 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 6 Years to 8 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Children whose parents accepted their participation in the study and who signed the Informed Consent (Annex 1) - Children enrolled in the school of the district of Pichanaki, province of Chanchamayo and department of Junín - Children between 6 and 8 years, with permanent upper and / or lower molars with the following characteristics: Deep cavities and cavities free of cavities, rated 0 and 1 according to ICDAS II Non-cavitated caries in enamel C1 according to ICDAS II Green and Vermillion Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHS) of 1 Have a pair of non-cavitated caries-free counterparts. -Collaborative and receptive children. Exclusion Criteria: - Children with the presence of a deep dental caries lesion, with pulp exposure, history of pain and presence of fistula or abscess adjacent to decayed tooth. - Medically compromised children - Children with developmental enamel defects. - Children with a known allergy to any of the resins used - Children with previously placed sealants or restorations - Children with bruxism or malocclusion - Children residing outside the city. - Children with poor hygiene Criteria for withdrawal of research subjects - When they did not attend the evaluations - If the participant has partial retention and total loss of the sealant, he will be withdrawn from the study after placing a new sealant. - If a patient moves to another region, it will be grounds for withdrawal from the study. - If the patient wishes to leave the study, they are considered outside the study Criteria for termination or interruption of the clinical trial. - When the 12-month follow-up of all the recruited patients, excluding the withdrawn ones, is completed, the study will be terminated. - Work is interrupted |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Peru | Manuel Gonzales Prada School | Alto Pichanaki | Chanchamayo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Catherine Christie Ruiz Yasuda |
Peru,
Abdel-karim UM, El-Eraky M, Etman WM. Three-year clinical evaluation of two nano-hybrid giomer restorative composites. Tanta Dent J [Internet]. 2014; 11 (3): 213-22.
Alirezaei M, Bagherian A, Sarraf Shirazi A. Glass ionomer cements as fissure sealing materials: yes or no?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Jul;149(7):640-649.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 May 4. — View Citation
Bagherian A, Shirazi AS. Flowable composite as fissure sealing material? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Dent J. 2018 Jan 26;224(2):92-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.40. Review. Erratum in: Br Dent J. 2018 Feb 23;224(4):254. — View Citation
Cobos-Carbó A, Augustovski F. [CONSORT 2010 Declaration: updated guideline for reporting parallel group randomised trials]. Med Clin (Barc). 2011 Jul 23;137(5):213-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.09.034. Epub 2011 Jan 15. Spanish. — View Citation
Cogo E, Calura G. Clinical evaluation of two materials Ußed As P I T and Fissure Sealants :2-year follow-up. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry Volume 2, Issue 4
de França TRT, Sedycias M, da Silva RJ, de Souza Beatrice LC, Vicente Da Silva CH. Use of Glass Ionomer Cement: A Systematic Review. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2010; 10 (2): 301-7.
Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Cordeiro Rde C, Lussi A. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;37(5):399-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00487.x. Epub 2009 Jul 22. — View Citation
Duggal MS, Tahmassebi JF, Toumba KJ, Mavromati C. The effect of different etching times on the retention of fissure sealants in second primary and first permanent molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1997 Jun;7(2):81-6. — View Citation
Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yildiz E. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study. J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015. Epub 2 — View Citation
Espinosa R, Valencia R, Uribe M, Ceja I, Saadia M. Enamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Fall;33(1):13-9. — View Citation
Fejerskov O. Changing paradigms in concepts on dental caries: consequences for oral health care. Caries Res. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):182-91. Review. — View Citation
Gillcrist JA, Vaughan MP, Plumlee GN Jr, Wade G. Clinical sealant retention following two different tooth-cleaning techniques. J Public Health Dent. 1998 Summer;58(3):254-6. — View Citation
Hou J, Gu Y, Zhu L, Hu Y, Sun M, Xue H. Systemic review of the prevention of pit and fissure caries of permanent molars by resin sealants in children in China. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1111/jicd.12183. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Review. — View Citation
Jafarzadeh M, Malekafzali B, Tadayon N, Fallahi S. Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up. J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Winter;7(1):1-5. Epub 2010 Mar 31. — View Citation
Khanna R, Pandey RK, Singh N . Morphology of Pits and Fissures Reviewed through Scanning Electron Microscope. Dentistry. 2015,5: 4. doi:10.4172/2161-1122.1000287
Kimura M, Maki K, Nishida I, Braham RL. Clinical evaluation of a light-cured glass ionomer lining cement. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1994 Sep;4(3):147-50. — View Citation
Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S. Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):468-73. — View Citation
Latin American Association of Pediatric Dentistry. Care Route for Pediatric Dental Procedures During the Confinement or Quarantine of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Dental EMERGENCY-URGENCY Consultation.2020; 10: 2-4.
Mallineni SK, Innes NP, Raggio DP, Araujo MP, Robertson MD, Jayaraman J. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Characteristics in children and considerations for dentists providing their care. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020 May;30(3):245-250. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12653. — View Citation
Martignon S, Pitts NB, Goffin G, Mazevet M, Douglas GVA, Newton JT, Twetman S, Deery C, Doméjean S, Jablonski-Momeni A, Banerjee A, Kolker J, Ricketts D, Santamaria RM. CariesCare practice guide: consensus on evidence into practice. Br Dent J. 2019 Sep;22 — View Citation
Ministry of Health. National Center for Epidemiology, Disease Prevention and Control. Burden of disease in Peru: Estimation of healthy years of life lost 2016 part I. 2018; part I. Available from: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minsa/informes-publicacione
Ministry of Health: National Center for Epidemiology, Prevention and Control of Diseases. Estimation of healthy years of life lost 2016. Enferm Burden in Peru [Internet].2018; Part II: 22-44.
Minsa. Clinical practice guide for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of dental caries in boys and girls.Resolution Minist N ° 422-2017 / MINSA [Internet]. 2017; 41.
Muller-Bolla M, Lupi-Pégurier L, Tardieu C, Velly AM, Antomarchi C. Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;34(5):321-36. Review. — View Citation
National cancer institute. NHI INFORMED CONSENT [Internet]. 2020 p. 163-6.
National Institute of Health. (2017). Regulations for Clinical Trials are approved. El Peruano, pp. 38-67. Retrieved from https://ensayosclinicos-repec.ins.gob.pe/images/REC-021-2017-sa-1538902-2.pdf
Nayhua Gamarra L, Grados Soto F, Llallico Huancaya W, Portocarrero Pechiarovich J, Virhuez Díaz T, Cruz Martínez A, et al. Technical Document Epidemiological Profile of Oral Health in school children from 3 to 15 years old, Peru 2012-2014; 1-82
Ntaoutidou S, Arhakis A, Tolidis K, Kotsanos N. Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):431-437. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018 — View Citation
Papageorgiou SN, Dimitraki D, Kotsanos N, Bekes K, van Waes H. Performance of pit and fissure sealants according to tooth characteristics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2017 Nov;66:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 8. — View Citation
Peng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci. 2020 Mar 3;12(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-0075-9. Review. — View Citation
Pozos-Guillén A, Chavarría-Bolaños D, Garrocho-Rangel A. Split-mouth design in Paediatric Dentistry clinical trials. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Mar;18(1):61-65. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.01.13. Review. — View Citation
Provenzano, M. G. A., Rios, D., from Lourdes Calvo Fracasso, M., Marchesi, A., & Honório, H. M. Clinical Evaluation of Sealants Made with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (Vitremer®) in Primary Molars. Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Inte
Rechmann P, Charland D, Rechmann BM, Featherstone JD. Performance of laser fluorescence devices and visual examination for the detection of occlusal caries in permanent molars. J Biomed Opt. 2012 Mar;17(3):036006. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.3.036006. — View Citation
Rishika, Garg N, Mayall SS, Pathivada L, Yeluri R. Combined Effect of Enamel Deproteinization and Intermediate Bonding in the Retention of Pit and Fissure Sealants in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(6):427-433. doi: 10. — View Citation
Shimazu K, Ogata K, Karibe H. Evaluation of the ion-releasing and recharging abilities of a resin-based fissure sealant containing S-PRG filler. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):923-7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-124. Epub 2011 Nov 25. — View Citation
Topal BG, Kirzioglu Z. Evaluation of the fissure sealants applied to erupting permanent molars in accordance to eruption stages: A prospective study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;22(11):1495-1502. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_534_18. — View Citation
Vaillard-Jiménez, E & Huitzil-Muñoz, E & Ortega, Ai & García-Damián S. Dimensional Characteristics of Fissures and Enamel Fissures of Temporary Molars. Rev Colomb Investig en Odontol [Internet]. 2013; 12 (2): 102-109. .
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7-34. doi: 10.3 — View Citation
Wadhwa S, A Nayak U, Kappadi D, Prajapati D, Sharma R, Pawar A. Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Resin-based Pit and Fissure Sealant and Self-adhering Flowable Composite: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):430-434. doi: 10.500 — View Citation
World medical association. Wma declaration of helsinki - ethical principles for medical investigations in human beings. 2017
Yazici AR, Bayazit EO, Kutuk ZB, Ozgunaltay G, Ergin E, Berber A. Clinical Follow-up of a Fissure Sealant Placed Using Different Adhesive Protocols: A 24-month Split-mouth Study. Oper Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;43(4):362-371. doi: 10.2341/17-055-C. Epub 2018 Apr — View Citation
* Note: There are 41 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Retention of sealants | Determine which of the two sealants has better retention during the period of 12 months, one based on flowable resin with sprg the other only based on flowable resin | 12 months | |
Secondary | Clinical preservation | Evaluate of clinical preservation of a sealant based on flowable resin with sprg and another based on flowable resin in first permanent molars, in the period of 12 months | 12 months | |
Secondary | Survival curve | Estimate the survival curve of a sealant based on flowable resin with sprg and another based on flowable resin in first permanent molars, in the period of 12 months. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Survival of the sealant | Compare the survival of a sealant based on flowable resin with sprg and another based on flowable resin in first permanent molars, in the period of 12 months | 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05606874 -
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04127357 -
Progression of Active Microcavitated Carious Lesions on Primary Molar Occlusal Surfaces
|
N/A |