Comparison of Two Different Flap Methods in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Pilonidal Sinus Clinical Trial

Official title:

Bilaterally Parallel Elliptic Flap Versus Karydakis Flap in Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05851690
• Other study ID #: E-16-975
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 16, 2016
• Est. completion date: January 25, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: April 2023
• Source: Atlas University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) has been defined as a disease characterized by chronic inflammation and recurrent infections caused by the movement of hair toward the gluteal sulcus. This condition is especially seen in young men and negatively affects the quality of life of patients and prevents them from performing their work and school activities. The treatment options for PSD range from the use of antibiotics alone to reconstructed excision with tissue flaps. Although the optimal surgical treatment option remains controversial, expectations from the ideal surgical treatment include low recurrence and postoperative complication rates, early wound healing, short hospital stay, early return to work, and good cosmetic outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the different flap techniques in the surgical treatment of PSD and evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 102
• Est. completion date: January 25, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: January 18, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Underwent surgery due to pilonidal sinus disease

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with a history of previous pilonidal sinus surgery,

• An acute pilonidal abscess,

• immunodeficiency,

• using immunosuppressive drugs,

• refuse to participate in the study

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Paranasal Sinus Diseases
• Pilonidal Sinus

Intervention

Procedure:
• Surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
Advancement flap techniques in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Atlas University

References & Publications (20)

Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3. — View Citation

Alvandipour M, Zamani MS, Ghorbani M, Charati JY, Karami MY. Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Blinded Parallel Randomized Study. Ann Coloproctol. 2019 May 22;35(6):3 — View Citation

Arslan K, Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O. Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Jan;18(1):29-37. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-0982-2. Epub 2013 Feb — View Citation

Ates M, Dirican A, Sarac M, Aslan A, Colak C. Short and long-term results of the Karydakis flap versus the Limberg flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10 — View Citation

Bali I, Aziret M, Sozen S, Emir S, Erdem H, Cetinkunar S, Irkorucu O. Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 May;70(5):350-5. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08. Epub 2015 May 1. — View Citation

Bessa SS. Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318280 — View Citation

Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70641-7. — View Citation

Caliskan M, Kosmaz K, Subasi IE, Acar A, Evren I, Bas G, Atayoglu AT. Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial. World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1091-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05331-1. — View Citation

Duman K, Girgin M, Harlak A. Prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease in Turkey. Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):434-437. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 14. — View Citation

Erkent M, Sahiner IT, Bala M, Kendirci M, Yildirim MB, Topcu R, Bostanoglu S, Dolapci M. Comparison of Primary Midline Closure, Limberg Flap, and Karydakis Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 11;24:8959-8963. doi: 10.12659/ — View Citation

Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;82(6):1169-85. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00062-2. — View Citation

Iesalnieks I, Ommer A, Herold A, Doll D. German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2569-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02060-1. Epub 2021 May 5. — View Citation

Johnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, Feingold DL, Steele SR; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pilo — View Citation

Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet. 1973 Dec 22;2(7843):1414-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92803-1. No abstract available. — View Citation

Keshvari A, Keramati MR, Fazeli MS, Kazemeini A, Meysamie A, Nouritaromlou MK. Karydakis flap versus excision-only technique in pilonidal disease. J Surg Res. 2015 Sep;198(1):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.039. Epub 2015 May 28. — View Citation

Keshvari A, Keramati MR, Fazeli MS, Kazemeini A, Nouritaromlou MK. Risk factors for complications and recurrence after the Karydakis flap. J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Apr 23. — View Citation

Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B; Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery. The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Oct;19(10):607-13. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1369-3. E — View Citation

Sewefy AM, Hassanen A, Atyia AM, Saleh SK. Karydakis Flap With Compressing Tie-over Interrupted Sutures Without Drain versus Standard Karydakis for Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 May;60(5):514-520. doi: 10.1097 — View Citation

Tokac M, Dumlu EG, Aydin MS, Yalcin A, Kilic M. Comparison of modified Limberg flap and Karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: prospective randomized study. Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):870-7. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00213.1. — View Citation

Yuksel BC, Berkem H, Ozel H, Hengirmen S. A new surgical method of pilonidal sinus treatment: a bilaterally paralel elliptic fascio-cutaneous advancement flap technique. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;113(12):728-31. doi: 10.4149/bll_2012_165. — View Citation

* Note: There are 20 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Time taken to return to work/school	Time to return to work in daily life after surgery	The patients' return to work ranged from 11 to 49 days.
Primary	Postoperative pain	The pain scores of the patients were determined on the first postoperative day. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored from 1 to 10, was administered to the patients to evaluate their postoperative pain levels.	1 day
Secondary	Length of hospital stay	Time to discharge from hospital after surgery	The patients' length of hospital stay ranged from 1 to 4 days.
Secondary	Recurrence of the disease	Recurrence of the disease	43 months