Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03837366
Other study ID # LEllingson_Fitbit_Intervention
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 11, 2015
Est. completion date March 3, 2016

Study information

Verified date February 2019
Source Iowa State University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Wearable fitness monitors are increasingly popular but the actual utility of these devices for promoting physical activity behavior is unknown. The purpose is to examine the efficacy of the Fitbit monitor for previously inactive individuals when used alone or following brief training in behavior change strategies and techniques. Psychosocial factors will be assessed and changes in physical activity will be monitored over three months to determine the efficacy of this intervention and to better understand individual differences in effectiveness.


Description:

The objective for this pilot study is to determine the efficacy of the Fitbit Charge wearable fitness monitor alone or in combination with additional behavior change strategies for increasing physical activity in inactive adults. A secondary objective is to assess the influence of psychosocial factors (e.g. self-efficacy, self-regulation, habit formation) on the effectiveness of this type of behavior change intervention. The central hypothesis is that use of the Fitbit will increase physical activity from baseline and that adding additional strategies will enhance this effect. This hypothesis is based on previous research demonstrating that continuous self- monitoring (using wearable technology) is effective in promotion of weight-loss in overweight and obese adults. This objective will be addressed through pursuing the following specific aims.

Aim 1: To determine the efficacy of using the Fitbit to increase physical activity behaviors and improve health markers in inactive adults. The working hypothesis is that wearing a Fitbit for 3 months will increase physical activity and improve health markers from baseline to follow-up in inactive adults.

Aim 2: To compare the efficacy of the Fitbit alone to the Fitbit in combination with behavior change strategies for increasing physical activity and improving psychosocial factors in inactive adults. The working hypothesis is that using the Fitbit along with behavior change strategies will lead to greater improvements in physical activity and psychosocial factors (self- motivation, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and social support) than using the Fitbit alone.

Aim 3: To assess the influence of individual differences in psychosocial variables on changes in physical activity over the intervention. The working hypothesis is that higher levels of self- motivation, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and social support at baseline will be predictive of greater improvements in physical activity over the intervention, regardless of group assignment.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 91
Est. completion date March 3, 2016
Est. primary completion date March 3, 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 24 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Not meeting physical activity guidelines

Exclusion Criteria:

- Meeting physical activity guidelines

- Injury or condition that limits mobility

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Activity tracker and health coaching
Use of an activity tracker alone or in combination with health coaching on physical activity behaviors.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Laura Ellingson-Sayen

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Steps Average steps accumulated per day assessed via the activPAL 3 months
Primary Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity Average minutes per day assessed via a combination of activPAL and ActiGraph 3 months
Secondary Habit Development Measured via the Automaticity Index of the Self-Reported Habit Index. The Self-Reported Habit Index consists of 12 items and the Automaticity Subscale includes 4 of these 12. Each item is scored on a 5-point (0-4) Likert scale with anchors ranging from strongly disagree (0) to strongly agree (4). As such, scores for the Automaticity Index range from 0-16 with higher scores indicating stronger habits. 3 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04505241 - Evaluating Mechanisms of Action of Adaptive Goal-Setting for Physical Activity N/A