View clinical trials related to Peritonitis.
Filter by:Ascites is the most common complication of cirrhosis, and its development is associated with substantially increased mortality. Ascites infection including spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), bacterascites and fungal infections. SBP is one of the most feared complications of ascites. The EASL guidelines recommend that diagnostic criteria of SBP is defined on the ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) count ≥250 cell/μl, with or without ascites fluid positive culture. However, in clinical practice. Up to 30% of hospitalized patients are considered as suspicious SBP, and treated as SBP without a laboratory-confirmed cause of infection. and is present in 10-30% of all hospitalized patients with ascites. Besides, fungal infection in ascites was aslo related to high mortality in cirrhosis patients. Thus, to diagnose ascites infection promptly is the key step to prevent the complication. Since, the sensitivity of bacterial culture is limited even if ascites is directly injected into blood culture bottles at the besides. New method to identified the pathogen is needed. Here, we aim to use metagenomic next-generation sequencing(mNGS) to provide the first-ever demonstration of precision medicine for the diagnosis of ascites infection in hospitalized patients, with immediate impact on clinical care and patients outcomes. The method of mNGS is undertaken by BGI Genomics Company which is a licensed clinical diagnostic laboratory in China. In this multicenter and prospective clinical study, we are planning to detect ascites sample by mNGS and compare the performance of mNGS and routine microbiological testing. Ultimately, we aim to improve the diagnosis of ascites infection and improve patients' outcomes.
The main infectious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is bacterial peritonitis, which increases morbidity, mortality and conversion to hemodialysis. In Mexico, 485 patients per million people undergo PD. The Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) reported 55,101 patients with kidney failure, 59% on PD. Automated PD (APD) has contributed by reducing peritonitis. The treatment of peritonitis in APD is carried out by changing to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or by adding a CAPD/day replacement, increasing costs and delaying treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of peritonitis antibiotic treatment applied in a DPA bag versus applied in a CAPD/day replacement plus APD in IMSS beneficiaries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A non-inferiority, multicenter clinical trial was carried out with patients> 18 years of age in APD with peritonitis. Group 1 (g1) receives antibiotics in DPA bags, group 2 (g2) receives antibiotics in a CAPD / day exchange plus APD. The antibiotics applied were ceftazidime 1500 mg / day 14 days and vancomycin 20 mg / kg every 3 days, 5 doses adjusted according to culture, followed by cytology every 48 hours until clinical resolution. Considering resolved peritonitis when symptoms disappeared and white blood cells <100 cells / mm3 were obtained in cytology. The Research and Ethics Committee approved the study. Relative risk (RR), relative risk reduction (RRR) were calculated. The Chi squared test, Student's t test, non-inferiority analysis was calculated considering p <0.05 significant, SPSS 24 and Epi Info were used.
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a home-based dialysis therapy and peritonitis is a serious complication in PD. A reliable point-of-care test to detect peritonitis is important for patients to self-detect peritonitis at home as delayed diagnosis and treatment of peritonitis will translate to poor outcomes in PD patients. The study aims to examine the effectiveness of Periplex®, point-of-care test, in the diagnosis of peritonitis in PD patients.
Damage control surgery (DCS) with abdominal negative pressure therap (NPT) and delayed anastomosis creation in patients with perforated diverticulitis and generalized peritonitis was established at our Institution in 2006 and has been published. This is the first prospectively controlled randomized study comparing DCS with conventional treatment (Group C).
The open abdomen can occur as a result of various diseases. After infections of the abdomen, compartment syndromes or traumata, it is essential for survival (1). This condition of the open abdomen lasts from days to months. Within a very short time, the fascia and abdominal wall structures retract in such a way that direct abdominal closure is often impossible. In addition, there is a pronounced intraabdominal oedema, which additionally increases the space required by the abdominal organs. Therefore, it is clinically indispensable to increase the space of the intraabdominal organs in this life-threatening situation. After the laparotomy (opening of the abdomen) has been performed, it is therefore not closed. However, the natural traction on the abdominal wall, in particular on the fascia, the attached musculature as well as skin and subcutis, no longer exists in this situation. As a result, these structures retract over the period of the existing laparostoma. In the present study, the CE-certified medical device Fasciotens Abdomen will be used to prove the functionality of this device and the user feasibility. The basic principle of Fasciotens Abdomen is the ventrally directed pulling force on the two fascial edges via an external device with support on the thorax and pelvis. The possibility to apply a traction to the fascia from the moment of opening the abdomen without reducing the intraabdominal space is absolutely new and the rationale of this technique. The objective of this study is to prove the obvious prevention of fascial retraction through the Fasciotens Abdomen device.
Fungal peritonitis accounts for nearly 70% of invasive candidiasis in surgical resuscitation. Their mortality is high, around 38% and their morbidity also with an increase in length of stay in intensive care, invasive ventilation times and an increase in the number of surgical revisions. Currently, diagnostic and therapeutic management is based on clinical prognostic scores, of which the "Peritonitis score" (PS) is still used as a reference. These scores are intended to best target a population eligible for probabilistic antifungal treatment pending the confirmation or not of the fungal characteristic of peritonitis by the fungal culture (Gold Standard). In case of severe peritonitis, if the PS is> or = to 3, the clinician must start a broad-spectrum antifungal treatment which will be continued if the culture of the peritoneal fluid is positive to yeast. If it is <3, it is not recommended to introduce an anti-fungal outside of very particular cases. In this situation, an anti-fungal treatment is only started if the direct examination of the peritoneal liquid made within 24 hours is positive to yeast or, failing this, to the reception of a positive culture several days later. However, recent reviews of the "Peritonitis score" have emerged from the analysis of the "fungal peritonitis" subgroup of the AmarCand II study (underestimation in particular) , highlighting the difficulty of identifying this target population. In addition, none of these clinical scores have demonstrated superiority in guiding probabilistic antifungal therapy. Direct examination of peritoneal fluid also suffers from low sensitivity. New diagnostic approaches using, among other things, blood markers (panfungal PCR, 1,3-Beta-D-glucan, etc.) have developed in recent years. In particular, 1,3-Beta-D-glucan has demonstrated superiority to the candida score in the early diagnosis of intra-abdominal candidiasis. [8]. His main interest lies in his strong Negative predictive value. The association of these markers is another way of working to improve their diagnostic performance. The use of these blood markers is encouraged by European and international consensus, however, their dosage in the peritoneal fluid is still under study. One of the consequences of these diagnostic difficulties is the occurrence of inadequate prescriptions of antifungals in more than 40% of cases of fungal peritonitis in intensive care, or even more than 70% of cases in the case of any type of candidiasis. invasive. The investigators therefore seek to study the diagnostic performance of fungal markers (BDG and PCR) increasingly realized in CHRU de Nancy in reference to the recommended tests (clinical (PS) and microbiological (ED and culture))
Multicenter randomized controlled trial including patients with fecal or diffuse peritonitis to either vacuum assisted closure or relaparotomy "on-demand".
For many patients peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the preferred form of dialysis to treat kidney disease as it provides greater flexibility and the ability to dialyse at home. However, PD use in Australia has been decreasing over the last 10 years. A big reason for this drop is the risk of infection. The best way to prevent PD related infections is to make sure that patients have good training in PD techniques. The researchers of this study have developed TEACH-PD, a new education package for training both PD nurses and PD patients. The aim of this study is to find out whether TEACH-PD training reduces the number of PD related infections.
At the end of most abdominal operations, the fascial layer is closed by stitching edges of the wound together. However, because of logistic and/or technical reasons or the patient's critical condition, the surgeon is forced to leave the abdomen open. The current approach for temporary coverage of abdomen is vacuum assisted techniques (VAT). This technique requires the use of vacuum-assisted drainage to remove blood or watery fluid from a wound or operative site. Although this is the most successful and commonly used procedure, there are some limitations to this method. For example, VAT have little effect on preventing lateral movement of the wound edges. Therefore, VAT it is not the ideal procedure in aiding surgeons to closed the abdomen. The purpose of this study is to compare usual care (vacuum or non-vacuum methods for temporary coverage of the OA) versus usual care plus a novel new abdominal binder device called ABRO™ that may aid in the closure of patients who undergo open abdomen closure procedures.
CAZ/AVI is a new antibiotic drug that is meant to be used for various indications including cIAI and nosocomial pneumonia. To date, limited data exists on PK of CAZ/AVI in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis as well as on penetration of CAZ/AVI in ELF of critically ill patients. The present study is carried out to determine target site PK of CAZ/AVI in these two populations, in order to contribute to a more complete understanding of the drug's penetration to its site of action.