Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement

Periprosthetic Fractures Clinical Trial

Official title:

Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02391129
• Other study ID #: 1674/2014
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: March 7, 2015
• Last updated: March 17, 2015
• Start date: January 2014
• Est. completion date: January 2015

Study information

• Verified date: March 2015
• Source: Medical University of Vienna
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Austria: Ethikkommission
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical (range of motion, weight bearing, quality of life) and radiographic outcome (boney consolidation) between open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plates with revision prosthesis using a non-cemented long femoral stem in a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip replacement.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 102
• Est. completion date: January 2015
• Est. primary completion date: January 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with Vancouver type- BlI, BIII and C fractures and unstable femoral prosthesis stem.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with pathological fractures,

• Vancouver type-A, Bl, and

• stable femoral prosthesis stem,

• Patients with hemi - prosthesis and periprosthetic femoral fractures were excluded from final analysis.

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Retrospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Femoral Fractures
• Fractures, Bone
• Periprosthetic Fractures

Intervention

Procedure:
• Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Medical University of Vienna

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Clinical Outcome (Range of Motion of the hip)	Range of Motion of the hip	follow up of at least 1 year	No
Primary	Radiographic Outcome (boney consolidation of the fracture)	boney consolidation of the fracture after 3 month, 6 month and at least 1 year after the operation	follow up of at least 1 year	No
Secondary	Patient's Mobility (assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score)	Patient's Mobility assessed by the Parker's Mobility Score	follow up of at least 1 year	No