Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Compared the Efficacy and Safety of CDOP Combined With Chidamide and CDOP in de Novo Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma Patients
The prognosis for Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) remains poor in comparison to B cell NHL. This is largely due to lower response rates and less durable responses to standard combination chemotherapy regimens such as CHOP. Whether CDOP plus Chidamide can improve the prognosis for PTCL.
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorder
arising from mature T-cells of post-thymic origin. PTCL represent a relatively uncommon
group of hematologic malignancies within non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), accounting for about
10% of NHL cases. The prognosis for PTCL remains poor in comparison to B-cell NHL. This is
largely due to lower response rates and less durable responses to standard combination
chemotherapy regimens such as CHOP. Progress has been further hampered by the relative
rarity and the biological heterogeneity of the diseases. Among PTCL cases worldwide, the
most common subtypes include PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS; 26%),
angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL; 18.5%), NK/T-cell lymphoma (10%), adult T-cell
leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL; 10%), ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL; 7%) and
ALK-negative ALCL (6%); subtypes such as enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL; <5%)
and primary cutaneous ALCL are relatively rare (<2%) with ALCL more common than NK/T or ATLL
in the United States.
PTCLs are less responsive to and have less frequent durable remissions with standard
chemotherapy regimens such as CHOP and thus carry a poorer prognosis compared to diffuse
large B-cell lymphomas. In prospective randomized studies, PTCLs have been included with
aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, it has not been possible to assess the impact of
chemotherapy in this subgroup of patients with PTCLs due to small sample size. Only limited
data exist from randomized trials comparing the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens
exclusively in patients with PTCL.
CHOP chemotherapy is the most commonly used first-line regimen for patients with PTCL.
However, with the exception of ALK+ ALCL, outcomes are disappointing compared to the
favorable results achieved with DLBCL. Chemotherapy regimens that are more intensive than
CHOP have not shown any significant improvement in OS in patients with PTCL, with the
exception of ALCL.
CHOP chemotherapy is frequently curative in only the small number of patients with favorable
prognostic features. As previously discussed, retrospective analysis from the International
T-cell Lymphoma Project showed that anthracycline-based chemotherapy did not favorably
impact survival in patients with the most common forms of PTCLs, namely PTCL-NOS and AITL.
In a retrospective study conducted by the British Columbia cancer agency, the 5-year OS rate
for patients with PTCL-NOS primarily treated with CHOP or CHOP-like regimens was only 35%;
among these patients, the 5-year OS rates were higher in patients with low-risk IPI scores
compared with those with high-risk IPI scores (64% vs. 22%, respectively). In addition,
patients with ALK-positive ALCL had superior clinical outcome compared to those with
ALK-negative ALCL (5-year OS 58% vs. 34%, respectively). The addition of etoposide to CHOP
(CHOEP regimen) compared with CHOP alone was evaluated in a randomized study by the German
High-grade NHL Study Group (DSHNHL). In relatively young patients with favorable prognosis
aggressive NHL (age ≤60 years; normal LDH levels), the CHOEP regimen resulted in
significantly higher CR rate (88% vs. 79%; P=0.003) and 5-year EFS rate (69% vs. 58%;
P=0.004). No difference was observed in OS outcomes between the regimens. It should also be
noted that in this study, the majority of patients had B-cell histology, with only 14%
diagnosed with T-cell NHL (with 12% of patients having ALCL, PTCL-NOS, or AITL histology).36
In an analysis of a large cohort of patients with PTCL treated within the DSHNHL trials,
patients with ALK- positive ALCL had favorable outcomes with CHOP or CHOP with etoposide
(CHOEP). Three-year EFS and OS rates were 76% and 90%, respectively, for patients with
ALK-positive ALCL. The corresponding outcomes were 50% and 67.5%, respectively, for AITL,
46% and 62%, respectively, for ALK-negative ALCL and 41% and 54%, respectively, for
PTCL-NOS. Among those with T-cell lymphoma, CHOEP was associated with a trend for improved
EFS among relatively young patients (age <60 years) and is an option for these patients.
CHOP-21 appeared to be the standard regimen for patients age >60 years, given that the
addition of etoposide did not provide an advantage in these older patients due to increased
toxicity. Among patients with ALK-negative ALCL, AITL and PTCL-NOS, those with low-risk IPI
scores (IPI <1) had a relatively favorable prognosis; contrastingly, patients with higher
risk IPI scores derived minimal benefit from CHOP or CHOEP.
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are involved in the remodeling of chromatin and play a key role
in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. HDACs act as transcription repressors by
removing acetyl groups from the e-amino- terminus of lysine residues within histones to
promote tighter winding of DNA around histone proteins. Elevated expression or activity of
HDACs is implicated in the development and progression of cancer. Inhibition of HDAC enzymes
results in increased histone acetylation, thereby inducing an open chromatin conformation
and transcription of previously dormant genes. At least 18 human HDACs have been identified
and are grouped into four classes. HDAC enzymes class I (HDAC1, 2, 3, and 8), class II
(HDAC4, 5, 7, and 9 as IIa, and HDAC6 and 10 as IIb), and class IV (HDAC11) utilize a
zinc-catalyzed mechanism for deacetylation of histones and non-histone proteins, whereas
class III (SIRT 1-7) HDACs are NAD+ dependent deacetylase enzymes. Although the precise
biological functions of individual HDACs are still largely unknown, the importance of HDAC
enzymes in the malignant phenotype has been most closely associated with Class I HDACs 1-3.
In addition, Class IIb HDACs 6 and 10 have been found to play a role in the expression and
stability of tumor angiogenesis gene products.
The synthesis of small-molecule HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) has been an active focus in the
field of anticancer drug discovery in recent years. Several different chemical classes of
HDACi have been described, including hydroxamic acids, carboxylic or short-chain fatty
acids, cyclic peptides, and benzamides. Examples of each of these classes have entered
clinical development as antitumor agents. Among them, the hydroxamic acid vorinostat (SAHA)
and cyclic peptide romidepsin (FK-228) were approved in the United States for the treatment
of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and very recently, romidepsin for peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
chidamide (CS055/HBI-8000), a new member of the benzamide class of HDACi. Chidamide inhibits
HDAC1, 2, 3, and 10 in the low nanomolar concentration range with broad spectrum antitumor
activity in vitro and in vivo. Mechanism studies have demonstrated that chidamide stimulates
human immune cell-mediated tumor cell killing activity with increased expression of genes
and proteins involved in natural killer (NK) cell functions.
Chidamide was found to be a low nanomolar inhibitor of HDAC1, 2, 3, and 10, the HDAC
isotypes well documented to be associated with the malignant phenotype. Significant and
broad spectrum in vitro and in vivo anti- tumor activity, including a wide therapeutic
index, was observed. Chidamide was also shown to enhance the cytotoxic effect of human
peripheral mononuclear cells ex vivo on K562 target cells, accompanied by the upregulation
of proteins involved in NK cell functions. Furthermore, the expression of a number of genes
involved in immune cell- mediated antitumor activity was observed to be upregulated in
peripheral white blood cells from two T-cell lymphoma patients who responded to chidamide
administration.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04526834 -
Phase 1 Study of Autologous CD30.CAR-T in Relapsed or Refractory CD30 Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04390737 -
Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Activity of HH2853
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05559008 -
A Umbrella Study in R/R PTCL Guided by Molecular Subtypes
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06083701 -
Phase I/II Study of Linperlisib Plus Chidamide for R/R Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma: a Prospective, Multi-center Study
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02856997 -
Chidamide With ICE Regimen for Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04083495 -
CD30 CAR for Relapsed/Refractory CD30+ T Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05979792 -
Clinical Study of CD7 CAR-T Cell Injection in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CD7-positive Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04984837 -
Study of Lacutamab in Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06072131 -
To Evaluate Efficacy of Belinostat or Pralatrexate in Combination Against CHOP Alone in PTCL
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01716806 -
A Study of Brentuximab Vedotin With Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) and CD30-expressing Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03947255 -
A Study of Retreatment With Brentuximab Vedotin in Subjects With Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma or CD30-expressing Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04028440 -
γδT Cells Immunotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05923502 -
(CHANT)Real World Study of Duvelisib in the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05883449 -
Phase 2 Study of AFM13 in Combination With AB-101 in Subjects With R/R HL and CD30+ PTCL
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05377827 -
Dose-Escalation and Dose-Expansion Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Anti-CD7 Allogeneic CAR T-Cells (WU-CART-007) in Patients With CD7+ Hematologic Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03586999 -
Nivolumab With Standard of Care Chemotherapy for Peripheral T Cell Lymphomas
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04489264 -
The Role of Consolidative Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation After First-line Therapy in Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06151106 -
Chidamide and Duvalisibon for the Treatment of Refractory/Relapsed Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02753543 -
Chidamide Plus Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06089941 -
Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing in Patients With Peripheral T-cell Lymphomas
|