View clinical trials related to Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.
Filter by:Background: Chronic neuropathic pain associated with peripheral neuropathies cannot be attributed solely to lesions of peripheral sensory axons and likely involves alteration in the processing of nociceptive information in the central nervous system in most patients. Few data are available regarding EEG correlates of chronic neuropathic pain. The fact is that effective cortical neuromodulation strategies to treat neuropathic pain target the precentral cortical region, i.e. a cortical area corresponding to the motor cortex. It is not known how these strategies might modulate brain rhythms in the central cortical region, but it can be speculated that sensorimotor rhythms (SMRs) are modified. Another potent way of modulating cortical rhythms is to use EEG-based neurofeedback (NFB). Rare studies previously aimed at relieving neuropathic pain using EEG-NFB training. Methods/Design: The objective of this single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled pilot study is to assess the value of an EEG-NFB procedure to relieve chronic neuropathic pain in patients with painful peripheral neuropathy. A series of 32 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two following EEG-NFB protocols, aimed at increasing either the low-β(SMR)/high-β ratio (n=16) or the α(μ)/θ ratio (n=16) at central (rolandic) cortical level. Various clinical outcome measures will be collected before and one week after 12 EEG-NFB sessions performed over 4 weeks. Resting-state EEG will also be recorded immediately before and after each NFB session. The primary endpoint will be the change in the impact of pain on patient's daily functioning, as assessed on the Interference Scale of the short form of the Brief Pain Inventory. Discussion: The value of EEG-NFB procedures to relieve neuropathic pain has been rarely studied. This pilot study will attempt to show the value of endogenous modulation of brain rhythms in the central (rolandic) region in the frequency band corresponding to the frequency of stimulation currently used by therapeutic motor cortex stimulation. In the case of significant clinical benefit produced by the low-β(SMR)/high-β ratio increasing strategy, this work could pave the way for using EEG-NFB training within the armamentarium of neuropathic pain therapy.
This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover outpatient study in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain with allodynia or hyperalgesia to cold, heat, brush and/ or pinprick stimulation. Patients will in random order receive ACD440 Gel or placebo treatment twice daily for 7 days, topically applied to the painful area. This is followed by a 2-week washout period, then receive the alternate treatment.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people who have diabetic neuropathic pain (DNP), a condition in which diabetes results in pain due to nerve damage. People with diabetes have high blood sugar levels. Over the time, high blood sugar levels can cause damage to the nerves in the body, which results in DNP. The nerve damage in this condition is localized in a stocking and glove like pattern and starts in the feet and can move upwards on your legs. Some patients also progress having pain in their fingers/hands. People with DNP have pain in these areas as well as reduction/loss of feeling, and at times light touch can feel like pain. In this study, the researchers want to learn more about a new study treatment called BAY 2395840. BAY 2395840 works by blocking a receptor called the bradykinin B1 receptor, or B1R. This receptor is has been shown to play a role in pain perception. The researchers also want to learn how well BAY 2395840 helps to reduce pain in the study participants. To answer this question, the researchers will measure how the participants' pain changes after taking BAY 2395840 compared to a placebo. A placebo looks like a treatment but does not have any medicine in it. The researchers also want to learn how safe BAY 2395840 is for the participants to take. The study will include adults. This will be a "crossover" study. In a crossover study, all the participants will receive both treatments (BAY 2395840 and placebo), but in a different order. All participants in this study will take BAY 2395840 and a placebo as tablets by mouth. There will be 2 periods in the study. Participants taking BAY 2395840 during period 1 will switch to placebo during period 2 and vice versa. There will some time for the switch from one period to another to make sure that whatever tablet you received in period 1 is gone from your system before period 2 starts to allow for the best possible evaluation of each tablet without any confusing effects. The study is double blinded meaning that neither you nor your doctor will know which drug you are on. The sequence of double-blind placebo and BAY treatment will be determined randomly by a computerized system. During the study, the participants will visit their study site 13 times. Each participant will be in the study for about 16 weeks. The treatment duration will be about 11 weeks. During the study, the study team will: - take blood and urine samples - do physical examinations - check the participants' overall health - check the participants' heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) - ask the participants about any medications they have been taking, and what adverse events they are having An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
This study is to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of SR419 in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
This study will evaluate the effect of Burst spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of painful radiculopathy in lower extremity(ies) with or without lower back pain. It is a multicenter double-blinded "n-of-1" RCT with repeated two-week periods of Burst SCS or sham in randomised order.
This is a phase 1, open-label, randomized, single dose, crossover clinical trial to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of YHD1119 in healthy male volunteers. Hypothesis: "YHD1119" is showing equal equal pharmacokinetics in fasted and fed state.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate three different injectable solutions used to block ankle nerves to manage ankle pain. The current standard of medical care is to inject a combination of local anesthetics and steroids around injured nerves. There is evidence that injection of local anesthetic (without the steroid) can calm the injured nerve and provide pain relief from a few days up to a few months. Injection of sterile salt water also has the potential to provide pain relief by breaking scar tissue around the nerve thereby relieving compression. Injections of local anesthetic and steroids around injured nerves have been used for many years to provide relief of pain but the specific reason is not well known for this benefit. There are three possibilities: 1) Steroids can reduce inflammation and calm the nerves, 2) local anesthetics can have similar actions but with shorter duration (few days), and 3) injection of any solution can break scarring around an injured/compressed nerve. The study will compare pain relief and possible adverse effects from these three different solutions. This study will help provide definitive answers regarding pain relief and possible adverse effects of the three solutions. This, in turn, will determine the best possible option for injection in patients with nerve-related injury pain.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-center, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy between YHD1119 and Pregabalin in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
The BlueWind Reprieve system is a neurostimulator consisting of an Implant and external components. The system is intended for home care use. The chronic pain treatment is achieved by an electrical stimulation of peripheral nerve fibers. The stimulation is set so that it generates paresthesia in the stimulated area (e.g. foot), reducing the pain sensation and improving the quality of life for the patient.
Currently, it is established that the voltage-gated calcium channels modulate pain perception due to an influence on the neuronal transmission and excitability. In the past, attention has focused on the modulation of high voltage activated calcium channel. More recently, scientific interest has proven to the low voltage activated calcium channel, also called T-type channels. The data from the literature show significant involvement of these channels in the physiology of nociception and pathophysiology of acute and chronic pain. Moreover, in several animal pain models (acute, neuropathic, inflammatory), T-type channels inhibition alleviates painful behaviours. Analgesics treatments available in clinic are ineffective in some patients with chronic pain (neuropathic, inflammatory) and often induce deleterious side effects. Thus, the clinical use of selective inhibitors of T-type channels could not only help the development of new therapies for the treatment of neuropathic pain (prevalence = 5-8 %), but also have a pharmaco-economic impact due to the low selling price of their inhibitor currently available: Zarontin®. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of ethosuximide (Zarontin®) on the pain symptoms and quality of life in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain compared to a control group.