Peripheral Nerve Injuries Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Human Schwann Cell (ahSC) Augmentation of Nerve Autografts After Severe Peripheral Nerve Injury (PNI)
Verified date | October 2023 |
Source | University of Miami |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety of autologous human Schwann cell (ahSC) augmentation of nerve autograft repair in participants with severe peripheral nerve injury (PNI). For humans with acute severe PNI, the hypothesis is that augmentation of nerve autograft repair with ahSCs can potentially enhance axonal regeneration and myelin repair and thus improve functional recovery.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 10 |
Est. completion date | September 1, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | September 1, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Persons with severe sciatic nerve injury, brachial plexus injury, and/or major injury at the upper or lower extremity with nerve loss within previous year; - Peripheral nerve injury with large gap (5 - 10 cm) between healthy nerve endings; - Between the ages of 18 and 65 years at last birthday; Exclusion Criteria: - Persons unable to safely undergo an MRI (may include persons with an implanted device or metallic fragments which may interfere with MRI safety); - Persons with pre-existing conditions that would preclude satisfactory sural nerve harvest (may include amputation or major injury to lower limb, or disease affecting the sural nerve); - Persons with severe peripheral nerve injury gap length > 10 cm in length; - Persons with history of radiation or local cancer in area of nerve injury, including primary tumors of the nerve; - Pregnant women or a positive pregnancy test in those women with reproductive potential prior to transplantation; - Presence of disease that might interfere with participant safety, compliance, or evaluation of the condition under study; - History of active substance abuse; - Persons allergic to gentamicin; - Persons who test positive for HIV or Hepatitis B or C virus; |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Miami | Miami | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
W. Dalton Dietrich | The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of participants with reported adverse events (AEs) | The number of participants with reported AEs will be evaluated to assess safety. Using CTCAE v4.0 grading scale, all AEs that are Grade 3 or higher with treating physician's attribution of probable or definite relation to intervention will be included. | 12 months post-transplantation | |
Primary | Number of participants with reported cell product culture test failure | Using sterility testing, the number of participants with reported cell product culture test failure will be evaluated. | 12 months post-transplantation | |
Primary | Change in muscle strength scale grade of affected limb muscles | The Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for muscle strength grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. | from baseline to 12 months post-transplantation | |
Primary | Sensory recovery scale grade of affected dermatomes | Assessment of pin-prick and two point discrimination in areas previously anesthetic in the distal distribution of the nerve injury. | from baseline to 12 months post-transplantation | |
Primary | Change in pain scores | The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire estimates the probability of neuropathic pain, based on 10 items. Seven items related to pain quality are based on an interview and 3 items are based on clinical examination. | from baseline to 12 months post-transplantation | |
Primary | Change in pain characteristics (location, intensity, and description) | Assessed by a pain diagram which identifies areas of pain with descriptors. An intensity scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable) is used to rate the overall intensity of pain at the time of assessment. | from baseline to 12 months post-transplantation | |
Primary | Number of participants with reported tumorigenesis or unexpected changes in nerve structure | Tumorigenesis and/or unexpected changes in the nerve structure will be determined by evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). | 2 years post-transplantation | |
Secondary | Change in muscle strength scale grade of affected limb muscles | The Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for muscle strength grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. | from baseline to 5 years | |
Secondary | Sensory recovery scale grade of affected dermatomes | Assessment of pin-prick and two point discrimination in areas previously anesthetic in the distal distribution of the nerve injury. | from baseline to 5 years | |
Secondary | Change in pain scores | The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire estimates the probability of neuropathic pain, based on 10 items. Seven items related to pain quality are based on an interview and 3 items are based on clinical examination. | from baseline to 5 years post-transplantation | |
Secondary | Change in pain characteristics (location, intensity, and description) | Assessed by a pain diagram which identifies areas of pain with descriptors. An intensity scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable) is used to rate the overall intensity of pain at the time of assessment. | from baseline to 5 months post-transplantation | |
Secondary | Nerve-graft continuity | Ultrasound will be used to assess nerve-graft continuity. | 2 weeks post-transplantation |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04572906 -
Safety and Efficacy of NTX-001 Compared to SOC in Acute Single Peripheral Nerve Injuries
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05848778 -
Non-invasive Therapy to Drive Nerve Regeneration
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02070367 -
Somatosensory Assessment and Rehabilitation of Allodynia (SARA)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03205124 -
The Effect of Pre-operative Electrical Stimulation on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01526681 -
Registry of Avance® Nerve Graft's Utilization and Recovery Outcomes Post Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03422107 -
Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) Monitoring for Detection of Intraoperative Positional Neuropraxia
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05339594 -
REINVENT Registry (Registry of the Nerve Gap Repair From Integra)
|
||
Completed |
NCT02437695 -
Robot Assisted Radical Prostatecomy and Positional Injury
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02786888 -
Prospective Comparison of Adductor Canal Block Performed With a Multiport Versus Single Bevel Needle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01954199 -
The Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Nerve-Related Leg Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02095899 -
Effect of Rufinamide on Chronic Postthoracotomy Pain Syndrome
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02403661 -
Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03191032 -
Early Sensory Re-education of the Hand With a Sensor Glove Model
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06209801 -
Mirror Therapy Integrated With Electrical Stimulation for Cortical Modulations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03913689 -
StimRouter Registry Clinical Protocol
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02459015 -
Performance Study of an Artificial Nerve Guide (Reaxon® Nerve Guide) to Treat Digital Nerve Lesions
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03780855 -
Preliminary Evaluation of the Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of the Bionic Nerve Scaffold
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05884125 -
Promoting Healing of Injured Nerves With Electrical Stimulation Therapy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04789044 -
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Mediated Fusion (PEG Fusion)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05611983 -
Experience and Feasibility of Methods for Early Sensory Training
|
N/A |