Peripheral Nerve Block Clinical Trial
Official title:
Standard Supraclavicular Block Versus Low-Volume Supraclavicular Block Plus Ulnar or Median Nerve Block for Hand Surgery in the Ulnar or Median Nerve Distribution
This study will examine how successfully nerves are blocked or frozen for hand surgery. Traditionally, the nerves are frozen at the base of the neck, just above the clavicle or collarbone (the supraclavicular block). This is mostly successful by itself, and provides anesthesia of the entire arm. Occasionally, an additional nerve block is required further down the arm, as the supraclavicular block may have missed a segment, or it is taking too long to come on. In this study the investigators will compare the traditional technique, with a similar but lower volume supraclavicular block plus an immediate low volume block of one nerve further down the arm (the ulnar or median nerve block, depending on which digits are being operated on). The investigators will compare success rates, speed of onset, procedural comfort and length of time of weakness and numbness, plus any adverse events.
Background
Regional anesthesia is commonly employed for surgery on the hand. It is well tolerated by
most patients and has a high safety record.
The most common form of regional anesthesia for this surgery is the supraclavicular block
which is successful in most cases. Occasionally an additional nerve block and/or moderate
sedation is required. The most frequent additional nerve blocks required are for the ulnar
and median nerves.
This study aims to address whether a low volume supraclavicular block plus a selective ulnar
or median nerve block reduces the time taken for onset of anesthesia, reduces the time of
post-operative complete limb immobility, improves the surgical success of the block, and
increases patient satisfaction, compared to a standard block.
The study will be powered to detect a 25% difference in successful surgical anesthesia.
Purpose
To ascertain whether the addition of an ulnar or median nerve block to a lower volume
supraclavicular block speeds up the onset and consistency of anesthesia, and the return of
limb function in patients undergoing hand surgery when compared to a standard supraclavicular
block.
Hypothesis
Low volume supraclavicular block plus selective distal nerve blocks will speed up the onset
of anesthesia, improve surgical anesthetic success and decrease the time to the return of
upper limb function when compared to a standard supraclavicular block.
Study population
Patients over 18 years of age, listed for hand surgery in the ulnar or median distribution at
the University of Alberta Hospital. The study will commence following ethical approval and
will run until 160 patients are enrolled.
Exclusion criteria
- Patient refusal
- Allergy to amide local anesthetics
- Severe coagulopathy
- Bilateral upper limb surgery
- Surgery involving bone graft from the iliac crest
- Request for general anesthetic from surgical or research team (for example, nerve
stimulation studies)
Methods
Consent will be obtained by one of the investigators. Patients not wishing to participate in
the study will receive either a brachial plexus block or a general anesthetic as deemed
appropriate by the attending anesthesiologist.
Patients to undergo surgery on the ring or pinky fingers will be randomised to receive either
a standard supraclavicular block, or a low volume supraclavicular block plus ulnar nerve
block. Patients receiving surgery on the thumb, index, or middle fingers will be randomized
in a similar fashion to a separate "median" group. All blocks will be placed in a designated
block area prior to transfer to the operating room by either an experienced staff
anesthesiologist or a supervised fellow in regional anesthesia. The block will be assessed
prior to surgery for motor and sensory dysfunction, and the block may be augmented if
necessary. The surgeon will determine the effectiveness of the surgical anesthesia, and will
indicate a need for surgical local anesthetic top up, heavy sedation or general anesthesia to
the anesthesiologist. Sedation can also be administered as per patient request.
Post-operatively, a patient satisfaction questionnaire will be completed. A phone call will
be conducted the following day.
Primary outcome measures
1. Successful surgical anesthesia
Secondary outcome measures
1. Time to successful anesthetic block
2. Procedural time
3. Duration of analgesia
4. Duration of weakness
5. Patient satisfaction
Safety concerns
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular blocks have been performed for many years, with a low
complication rate. The addition of a peripheral nerve block is not uncommon, and poses
minimal additional risk.
Major concerns
1. Pneumothorax
2. Nerve damage
3. Intravascular injection causing local anesthetic toxicity
4. Infection
Minor concerns
1. Block failure
2. Transient hemidiaphragmatic paresis
3. Transient Horner's syndrome
4. Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy
5. Haematoma at injection site
Study Protocol
Patients will be transferred to the block area. Midazolam will be titrated to an appropriate
level. A time out procedure will be undertaken to ensure the correct side is being blocked.
The skin will be disinfected. The ultrasound probe will scan the supraclavicular fossa to
identify the subclavian artery. The brachial plexus is identified postero-lateral to the
artery.
Standard supraclavicular block
The skin will be infiltrated with lidocaine. A needle attached to a nerve stimulator will be
introduced. The target will be an area infero-medial to the brachial plexus. In this position
10 - 20 ml of a 3:1 Lidocaine 2%: 0.5% Bupivacaine solution is injected. A more superficial
injection is then made. A further 10-20 mls of the Lidocaine:Bupivacaine solution is
deposited. The total volume will be recorded with a maximum of 30mls.
Low volume supraclavicular block with ulnar nerve block
The skin infiltration and target of the needle is the same as for the standard
supraclavicular block. However, a maximum of 15ml of the solution will be injected. The arm
is then abducted and supinated. The ulnar artery is identified. The ulnar nerve is seen
medial to the artery. 5ml of the solution is deposited adjacent to the nerve.
Low volume supraclavicular block with median nerve block
The skin infiltration and target of the needle is the same as for the standard
supraclavicular block. However, a maximum of 15ml of the solution will be injected. The
patient's elbow is flexed and the nerve is visualized on ultrasound in the antecubital fossa
lying medial to the brachial artery. Anesthetic solution is deposited in the forearm to
target the median nerve.
Intra-operative management
Following block assessment, the patient will be transferred to the operating theatre.
Additional midazolam may be given. Propofol at 50mcg/kg/minute will be commenced if required,
and the rate can be increased to 75mcg/kg/minute. If the patient is unable to tolerate the
procedure, sedation can be increased to at least 100mcg/kg/minute and the block is deemed an
unsuccessful surgical block.
Block Assessment
Patients will be assessed for sensory and motor blockade of each nerve at 5 minute intervals.
A successful anesthetic block will be defined as a sensation score in the ulnar or median
area of 0 or 1, and an ulnar or median motor score of 2 or less. If this does not occur in
the standard group, an ulnar or median nerve block will be performed. If this does not occur
in the combined group, a general anesthetic will occur.
Nerve block extent may also be assessed by objective means (e.g., strength testing with a
dynamometer).
A successful surgical block will be defined as requiring no further LA top-up or
infiltration, and sedation no greater than 75mcg/kg/min.
Data collection
Data will be collected on a study sheet. Information will be kept confidential and there will
be no patient identifiers on the form.
The data collected will be age, sex, height and weight, the type of block used, the amount of
local anesthetic used, the length of time taken to perform all blocks, the block assessment
data. Intraoperative data will note whether additional local anaesthetic, heavy sedation or
general anesthesia was required and the reason. Post-operative data will be a patient
questionnaire asking about block-related and surgery-related pain score. A follow up phone
call the day after surgery will determine the timing of return of power and sensation of the
arm.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05610969 -
Music vs Midazolam During Preop Nerve Block Placement - Part 2 Study On Anxiolytic Options Before Peripheral Nerve Blocks
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03628040 -
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03326609 -
Local Anesthetic Concentration and Nerve Block Duration
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02576015 -
The Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block With Modulation of Depth of Anesthesia on Prognosis of Patients Receiving Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02374008 -
The Analgesic Effect of Combined Nerve Block and Systemic High Dose Glucocorticoid After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06155903 -
Peripheral Nerve Block vs Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Femur Fracture
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT05190302 -
Determination of the Sensitivity, Specificity & Receiver Operating Characteristic of Nerve Stimulation Receptor as a Decision-making Tool During US Guided PNB
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02161484 -
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block With and Without Parasacral Block in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06357013 -
Postoperative Analgesia in Bilateral Knee Arthroplasties
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06267716 -
Pericapsular Nerve Block and Iliopsoas Fascial Plane Block in Hip Surgery
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04539730 -
Liposomal Bupivacaine in Adductor Canal Blocks (ACB)
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03385967 -
Duration of Analgesia With Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine in Brachial Plexus Block
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03069677 -
Music vs Midazolam During Preop Nerve Block Placement
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04294732 -
Efficacy of Popliteal Block and Bupivacaine Concentration Used for Analgesia in Foot and Ankle Surgery
|
Phase 4 |