Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Clinical Trial
— ViaValve-001Official title:
A Post-market, Randomized Study Evaluating the Clinical Performance of the ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter
Verified date | April 2014 |
Source | Smiths Medical, ASD, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this post-market, prospective study is to evaluate the clinical acceptability, blood leakage, risk for blood exposure, need for digital compression, insertion success, and clinical utility of the ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter compared to standard hospital PIVCs currently being used.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 150 |
Est. completion date | December 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - A peripheral intravenous catheter will need to be inserted in order to gain access to a vein or artery to sample blood, monitor blood pressure, or administer fluids intravenous infusion as part of treatment. - Willing and able to sign an Informed Consent (patient or legally authorized representative). Exclusion Criteria: - Body morphology (e.g., size) precludes the use of a peripheral intravenous catheter. - Fluid to be infused is not appropriate for peripheral intravenous catheters. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Foothills Medical Centre | Calgary | Alberta |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Smiths Medical, ASD, Inc. |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Clinical acceptability of PIVC insertion | Demonstrate non-inferiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control PIVC for ratings of clinical acceptability. Clinicians will agree or disagree that the device was clinically acceptable for the insertion. | Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion | |
Primary | Frequency of blood leakage | Demonstrate superiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control in preventing blood leakage from the catheter hub during insertion. | Clinicians will report if blood leakage occurred immediately after the catheter insertion | |
Primary | Eliminating risk of blood exposure | Demonstrate superiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control PIVC in eliminating the clinician's risk of blood exposure during the insertion process. | Clinicians will report on the ability of the PIVC to eliminate blood exposure immediately after catheter insertion | |
Secondary | Insertion success | Demonstrate the insertion success rate of the ViaValve™ I.V. Catheter is non-inferior to the control PIVC. Insertion success defined as a catheter confirmed successfully placed within the selected vessel in 3 or fewer venipuncture attempts. | Clinicians will report if the insertion was successful immediately after performing insertion | |
Secondary | Elimination of digital compression | Demonstrate that the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter is non-inferior to the control PIVC in eliminating the clinician's need to use digital compression during the insertion process. Clinicians will agree or disagree the device eliminates the need for digital compression after each PIVC insertion. | Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion | |
Secondary | Ease of Use | Demonstrate that the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter is non-inferior to the control PIVC in seven measures of ease of use. Clinicians will agree or disagree with seven statements regarding ease of use/clinical utility. | Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06233214 -
The Effect of the Vein Imaging Device Used in Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Application on the Success of the Procedure in Patients Coming to the Pediatric Emergency Department
|
N/A |