Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04389788
Other study ID # Sohagu309
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 12, 2020
Est. completion date October 21, 2020

Study information

Verified date October 2020
Source Sohag University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH) is a common condition in dermatology practice. Periorbital hyperpigmentation is defined as bilateral, round, homogeneous pigmented macules.The etiology of POH is multifactorial including genetic and enviromental factors. Many treatment options are avaiblabe with variable efficacy and safety in different patients. Therefore, the investigator's study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined microneedling with topical Glutathione versus Carboxy Therapy in treatment of patients with periorbital hyperpigmentation.


Description:

Periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH) is a common skin condition which has a great negative effect on the patient quality of life. Many factors contribute in the pathogensis of POH which lead to developement of several treatment options with no treatment option has a great sucess in improving the POH and patient quality of life. Our current study tries to explore the efficacy and safety between 2 treatment methods in a split face study. Microneedling is a process of making small punctres into the skin through small needles by device which is called a Dermapen. This microneedling method is beleived to be associated with improving the skin quality through increased collagen. This microneedling will be followed by topical application of glutathione which is a commong antioxidant with whitening effects. Carboxy therapy is a new emerging treatment option in many dermatological diseases. It will be used in POH patients as it will be able to increase blood flow in periorbital area and improve the skin qulaity.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 31
Est. completion date October 21, 2020
Est. primary completion date October 10, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with Periorbital hyperpigmentation Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnancy and lactation . - Allergy, hypersensitivity to the formulations to be used in the study. - Any other cutaneous or systemic disease. - Patient who had taken any other treatment (laser, dermabrasion) on the affected region performed less than 6 months prior to the beginning of the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
carboxy therapy
6 sessions of carboxy therapy every 2 weeks
Dermapen with topical glutathione
6 sessions of Dermapen microneedling with topical glutathione every 2 weeks

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University Sohag

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Sohag University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change of periorbital hyperpigmentation through photo evaluation High-resolution photographs of both sides of the face were taken. Using a physician visual analog scoring system, 2 independent blinded dermatologists will rate the patient's overall aesthetic improvement as follows 1 (worse), 2 (no change), 3 (<30%), 4 (30-60%), and 5 (>60%) Baseline, before 3rd session, before 5th session, 1 month after end of treatment, 2 months after end of treatment
Primary Change of periorbital hyperpigmentation through dermoscopy evaluation Dermoscopic evaluation was done using dermalite connection kit for Samsung galaxy. 2 independent blinded dermatologists will rate the patient's overall aesthetic improvement as follows
Vasculature improvement (No 0, Yes 1) & percent of improvement.
Pigmentation improvement (No 0, Yes 1) & percent of improvement.
Skin improvement like atrophy and exaggerated skin markings (No 0, Yes 1) & percent of improvement.
Baseline, before 3rd session, before 5th session, 1 month after end of treatment, 2 months after end of treatment
Primary Change of the patient satisfaction evaluation: scale The patients were asked to evaluate their own level of satisfaction after they completed the study on a 1-3 scale: 1 = slightly satisfied, 2 = moderately satisfied, and 3 = well satisfied Baseline and 1 month after end of treatment
Primary Change of periorbital hyperpigmentation into another skin problem through safety evaluation Safety evaluation to detect precentage of side effects reported either by the patient or by the physician. Baseline, before 3rd session, before 5th session, 1 month after end of treatment, 2 months after end of treatment
Secondary The Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaire The Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaire (DLQI) is 10 questions were asked to the patients and score is 0-3 for each question. The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. Baseline, before 3rd session, before 5th session,
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT03862118 - Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Periorbital Hyperpigmentation(POH) Phase 3