View clinical trials related to Periodontal Pocket.
Filter by:Three types of papilla incision in periodontal reconstruction techniques will be compared.
Periodontitis is a chronic condition associated with the inflammatory destruction of the periodontal tissues ultimately leading to tooth loss. Clinically, it is identified by key features such as clinical attachment loss (CAL), bleeding upon probing (BOP), and an increase in probing pocket depth (PPD), and/or gingival recession. Periodontitis is mediated by polymicrobial dysbiosis with keystone pathogens affecting the virulence of the entire biofilm community. The removal of this biofilm and its retention factors is the ultimate goal of clinical treatment and oral measures applied. The elimination of the biofilm has traditionally been achieved with the use of either hand instruments or power driven devices. Promoting periodontal health or diminishing bacterial presence and calculus buildup on teeth can be accomplished with the same efficacy whether using manual scalers and curettes or ultrasonic scaling instruments. Both hand and ultrasonic instruments are characterized by being time-consuming and requiring technical skill, often causing patient discomfort and post-treatment pain, including hypersensitivity resulting from the loss of hard tissue when scaling the tooth surface. Ultrasonic instruments tend to leave a rougher surface behind compared to hand instruments. While effective the current techniques all have their disadvantages. The aim of this study is to evaluate changes in probing depth clinically, Bleeding on probing, Clinical attachment level, Plaque index, Calculus index, Patient pain/discomfort, Patient satisfaction, Cost effectiveness, Treatment time and Number of pockets closed after using AIRFLOW® Prophylaxis Master device with erythritol powder.
To evaluate the clinical effect of site preservation after third molars extraction by using tooth extraction of third molars with site preservation using bio-oss and bio-guide in preventing the formation of deep periodontal pockets in the distal of second molars.
Bleeding on probing (0,1,2,3), plaque index (+,-) and pocket probing depth will be recorded for each visit. Before the procedure, the patient will be randomly assigned to one of four groups and records will be kept. In the frst visit of the patient, necessary actions will be taken according to the group to which the patient is assigned. The implant periphery of the patients assigned to the chitosan brush group will be debrided with a chitosan brush with circular movements. The implants of the patients assigned to the air abrasive device group will be cleaned in the same way with circular movements. The debrided area of both groups will be washed with sterile serum after the treatment. Patients will be called at the 2nd, 4th and 12th weeks and compared with the records kept.
The commensal oral bacteria are responsible for the initiation and propagation of the disease through the process of dysbiosis, or microbial imbalance. The disease proceeds cyclically with periods of activity and quiescence until therapeutic action is taken, or the tooth and surrounding structures are destroyed by the disease process that may result in the loss of the tooth. As periodontal disease progresses from gingivitis to periodontitis, a greater number of anaerobic organisms colonize deeper periodontal pockets, such as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis, which triggers the host inflammatory response. This response includes the production and dissemination of C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of inflammation, as well as various neutrophil and macrophage compounds such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and interleukins (IL-1 and IL-8). An elevated serum CRP level suggests that the inflammation arising as a result of periodontitis may correlate with cardiovascular pathology. Additionally, smoking creates an increasingly favorable environment for the growth of periodontal pathogens, thus furthering the disease process. In recent meta-analysis, published articles on the effect of saffron supplementation on three inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6) were evaluated. Combining eight eligible trials, it was demonstrated that saffron supplementation did not have a significant effect on serum levels of the three inflammatory biomarkers. However, in the subgroup analysis, saffron was found to significantly reduce CRP and TNF-α serum concentrations
Periodontitis is a bacterial inflammatory disease and antibiotic use is being empirically used as part of its treatment. However, a clinical practice guideline on periodontal treatment adjuncts published in 2015 identified weak evidence on the use of systemic antibiotics and large heterogeneity across small scale studies, suggesting that larger pragmatic clinical trials would benefit clinical decision making. This will be a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, stratified by practice and practitioner. The study will investigate the effectiveness of adjunctive antibiotics as adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) compared to SRP with placebo for the treatment of generalized stage II-III, grades A-C periodontitis in approximately 544 patient participants from about 34 National Dental PBRN practices. Periodontal data will be collected at baseline, re-evaluation (6 weeks), and final (12 months) study visits. Changes in periodontal clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed to determine the effectiveness of SRP plus adjunctive systemic Amoxicillin / Metronidazole antibiotics (AMXM) versus SRP with Placebo.
There is a known correlation between oral health and systemic disease. Particularly significant evidences associate periodontal bacteria and tooth loss to systemic disorders and specifically to cardiovascular disease, such as high BP. Furthermore, a correlation between periodontal disease and hypertension has been recently reported ESRD and the medications used by those patients create complications in a variety of systems and organs, which frequently worsens or causes new pathologies in the oral cavity, such as caries, periodontal disease, and different mucosal lesions. Therefore, the current trial was set up to first evaluate the effect of thyme honey oral rinse in ESRD patients with periodontitis using CAL as a primary objective, and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of thyme honey oral rinse in ESRD patients with periodontitis on bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index, and salivary NO levels as secondary objectives.
The treatment of periodontitis should be carried out in an incremental manner, first by achieving adequate patient's oral hygiene practices and risk factor control during the first step of therapy and then, during the second step of therapy, by professional elimination (reduction) of supra and subgingival biofilm and calculus. If the endpoints of therapy (no periodontal pockets >4 mm with bleeding on probing, BoP, or deep pockets ≥5 mm) have not been achieved, the third step of therapy should be implemented. In fact, residual pockets following step 1 and 2 of periodontal treatment are associated with increased risk of periodontal disease progression in the long-term as reported by Claffey & Egelberg in1995. Residual probing depth (PPD) ≥5 mm after active therapy is a risk factor for disease progression and tooth loss during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT), suggesting that additional treatment of residual pockets is strongly recommended. The third step of treatment includes the following interventions: repeated subgingival instrumentation, access flap periodontal surgery, resective periodontal surgery, regenerative periodontal surgery. In case of residual pockets associated with shallow-moderate infrabony defects at posterior teeth, where both regenerative therapy and non-surgical re-instrumentation are usually not indicated, access flap procedures (i.e., the Modified Widman Flap, MWF) and the Osseous Resective Surgery (ORS) are considered two of the most viable options. The value of these surgical techniques has been tested over the years by different clinical trials, and the choice of a surgical approach still relies mainly on the decision-making process of the surgeon, since the long-term outcomes of the different periodontal surgical procedures are similar, as highlighted by a recent systematic review. Nevertheless, one the main criticism that have been moved against ORS, lies on the fact that the side effects (i.e., gingival recessions) seem to be more severe for ORS surgery, when compared with MWF. In the early 2000s, Carnevale proposed the Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery (FibReORS), an approach that leads to a more conservative bone resection to eliminate infrabony defects and establish a positive bony architecture than the conventional ORS. Indeed, this one, based on the histological findings by Gargiulo et al. (1961), uses the level of the connective tissue attachment - rather than the bottom of the osseous defect - as the reference to apply the principles of ORS. Two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that FibReORS is similarly effective as ORS for PPD reduction with less final gingival recessions (REC), clinical attachment loss (CAL) patient morbidity. Nevertheless, no studies have ever directly compared FibreORS with MWF. Therefore, the aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to compare the efficacy of FibReORS versus MWF in the treatment of periodontal pockets associated with infrabony defects ≤3 mm at posterior natural teeth. Objectives The experimental hypothesis is: FibReORS is superior to MWF in achieving PPD closure (PPD <4 mm without BoP) at posterior teeth associated with shallow-moderate infrabony defects.
In the here suggested study, the aim is to test non-surgical treatment of advanced periodontal disease with a chitosan brush with or without chitosan gel in patients with advanced periodontal disease having responded poorly to a more conventional treatment strategy, with the aim to hinder the progression of bone loss around the teeth.
in this study, insulin and hyaluronic acid will be used after open flap debridement in treatment of periodontal defects. outcome will be evaluated clinically and radiographically