View clinical trials related to Periapical Periodontitis.
Filter by:Endodontic treatment is done in Patients with chronic pulp exposure in patients with Coronary Artery Disease and systemic inflammatory markers recorded before and and after treatment and compared with patients with Coronary Artery Disease without chronic pulp exposure.
Background Root canal therapy is the primary treatment of choice for necrotic mature teeth with periapical lesions (PRLs), which does not restore the tooth's vitality. Provided that injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) has shown promising results in regenerative medicine as a novel platelet concentration, the purpose of this study is to ascertain whether i-PRF, as opposed to blood clot (BC), can serve as a biological scaffold, thereby expanding the indications for regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) in mature teeth. Novelty There is no study available that has evaluated the outcome of REP in the necrotic mature mandibular molars with periapical lesions. Furthermore, the efficacy of novel i-PRF as a scaffold in REPs remains to be explored. Objectives To evaluate and compare the outcome of REPs in comparison to conventional RCT in necrotic mature molars with PRLs and to evaluate the efficacy of i-PRF and BC in REP as a scaffold. Secondary objective is to evaluate pain for first postoperative week and subjective responses to pulp sensibility tests at 12 months follow-up. Method 120 patients presenting with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions will be randomly allotted to one of the three groups - REP using i-PRF or BC or RCT group. Comparative evaluation of outcome of REP and RCT will be performed at 12-months follow-up.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of two different periapical surgery methods ("curettage+apical resection" and "curettage") on the bone regeneration and clinical healing without applying any material or with applying leukocyte and platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) to the periradicular intraosseous defect in the treatment of the teeth with large periapical lesions by following the patients for 12 months.
To the best of knowledge, only 2 prospective studies, and 1 cross-sectional study have been reported which have seen the periapical healing after non surgical endodontic treatment in diabetic patients and their effect on HbA1c. Because of the inconsistencies in data available from the literature and considering the limitations of cross-sectional studies, further studies, especially using a prospective design, are required. So, aim is to investigate the effects of non surgical endodontic treatment on healing and systemic inflammation in individuals with and without diabetes.
Introduction: In the US, 15 million root canal treatments (RCTs) are carried out annually. Success rates decrease with conventional chemo-mechanical root canal preparation techniques used on teeth with periapical radiolucencies associated with bacterial presence. New irrigation modalities, such as the GentleWave® System (GWS) and Waterlase iPlus® (WL), have been developed to overcome limitations and improve RCT success rates. Hypotheses: (1) GWS and WL provide superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional RCT using passive ultrasonic activation (PUI). (2) GWS and WL are acceptable treatment modalities for clinicians and patients. Aims: (1) Estimate probability of success of GWS, WL, and conventional RCT with PUI. (2) Evaluate clinician and patient experiences of the different techniques.
There is lack of evidence on resolution of signs of systemic inflammatory markers by successful elimination of periapical inflammation by endodontic treatment. Complete blood count (CBC) may have potential to detect various inflammatory conditions but its use for this purpose is sparsely reported. To the best of our knowledge effect of chronic apical periodontitis on various parameters of complete blood count has not been studied.
The study design is a randomized controlled trial and up to 120 teeth, 50 in each of the 2 groups, will be enrolled from the patients at the National University Centre for Oral Health Singapore (NUCOHS) Endodontic unit. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of selective caries removal (SCR) and pulpotomy in preventing pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis in teeth with deep dental caries radiographically extending at least 2/3 into the width of dentine, over a review period of 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years. The secondary aim of this study is to compare the costs (tangible i.e. restorative treatment costs, and intangible i.e. number of treatment visits and time spent at clinic to complete treatment) and tooth survival in the oral cavity, between teeth treated with SCR and pulpotomy.
The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare, clinically and radiographically, the outcome of non surgical primary/secondary root canal treatment using a hydraulic sealer or a zinc oxide-eugenol sealer.
To the best of our knowledge, only two studies are available which have provided a direct comparison between outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery. The results of the two studies are contradictory in nature. Two systematic reviews conducted to explore the issue also could not draw any definitive conclusions and suggested that further research is necessary to find out effects of surgical versus nonsurgical approach. Considering the very limited amount of data on this pertinent topic, there is apparent need of high quality randomized controlled studies to further investigate the difference in outcome between nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery.
The aim of the study is to assess the correlation between pre-obturation bacterial detection using fluorescence amplification and outcome of endodontic treatments. Thus, enabling a suitable detection threshold to predict the likelihood of treatment failure. This has the potential to be used a bench side tool in general dental practice to act as a surrogate endpoint for clinicians performing root canal treatment.