View clinical trials related to Perianal Abscess.
Filter by:Rationale: Perianal fistulas are a common, invalidating problem for which a more effective and widely applicable treatment is necessary. Vacuum therapy has become one of the main pillars for management of a wide variety of (chronic) wound healing problems. A novel catheter set was developed for vacuum therapy of perianal abscesses/sinuses and fistulas: The Semiflex Dome System. This system will allow for a better and faster treatment and it will offer conformability with various fistula shapes and sizes. Objective: With this pilot study, the investigators aim to test our novel catheter set for vacuum therapy of perianal abscesses/sinuses and fistulas for feasibility and efficacy. Study design: The design of this prospective, multicentre study is a feasibility study. Study population: Patients (≥ 18 years) with (Crohn's) perianal fistulas and patients with perianal abscesses/sinuses are eligible. Intervention: A tailored (length and diameter) Semiflex dome catheter is inserted under general anaesthesia, after 6 weeks of seton drainage in patients with a perianal fistula and right away in patients with a perianal abscess/sinus. The catheter is fixed on a Renasys Adhesive gel patch (Smith and Nephew) and is connected with a tubing system to a vacuum pomp with an average vacuum pressure of 80 cm H2O. After two - three days the catheter will be exchanged by a shorter catheter in the outpatient setting. The therapy is continued for a maximum of four weeks in patients with a perianal abscess/sinus and two weeks in patients with perianal fistulas. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary objective of the study is the feasibility of the methodology with respect to smoothness of insertion and changing the semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the catheter and maintaining vacuum for more than 48 hours, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. Secondary objectives are efficacy of drainage of the perianal abscess/sinus, efficacy of curing the perianal abscess/sinus in terms of complete collapse of the sinus and disappearance of induration, efficacy of management of perianal fistula in terms of clinical and radiological healing, and safety in terms of complications. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation: The Semiflex Dome Catheter System will be placed in patients with perianal fistulas and perianal abscess/sinus who would otherwise be treated using prior-art passive drainage catheters or repurposed vacuum-assisted closure therapy sponges. There are no known additional risks stemming from the proposed therapy. The Semiflex Dome Catheter System is made entirely of medical-grade silicone certified with ISO 10993- 05 and ISO 10993-10. The catheters will be connected with a tube configured to be connected to a CE certified vacuum generating system. Sample size: Since this is a pilot study no sample size is required. The pilot study will consist of 2 parts. In the first part, 10 patients in each study group will be included and it will be assessed per study group if the catheter meets the proof of principle. After a positive result in one or both study groups, the second part of the study will start. 10 patients in each study group will be included. The proposed treatment protocol is considered feasible if at least 70% of the Semiflex dome catheter treatment per study group meets the four primary objectives.
Study Description: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the duration of postoperative pain relief achieved with two different approaches to pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing elective perianal surgery. The main question this study aims to answer is whether adding Methylene Blue to Bupivacaine pudendal nerve block can prolong postoperative analgesia compared to using Bupivacaine alone. Participants in this study will be individuals with ASA I and II physical status undergoing elective perianal surgery under spinal anesthesia. They will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1. Group A (Case Group): Participants will receive a pudendal nerve block with Bupivacaine combined with Methylene Blue. 2. Group B (Control Group): Participants will receive a pudendal nerve block with Bupivacaine alone. The pudendal nerve block will be performed using ultrasound guidance at the level of the ischial spine. The needle tip will be positioned between the Sacro tuberous and sacrospinous ligaments to inject the local anesthetic or the local anesthetic combined with Methylene Blue. Throughout the study, the researchers will monitor the time to the first rescue analgesic, assess pain levels using the Numeric Rating Scale at various time intervals (2, 6, 24, 48 hours, and 7 days), and observe for any side effects or complications related to the intervention. Participants will be closely observed after surgery to assess their pain levels and analgesic requirements. The researchers will also evaluate patient satisfaction using the Likert scale. By comparing the outcomes between the two groups, the study aims to determine if the addition of Methylene Blue to Bupivacaine pudendal nerve block provides superior postoperative analgesia in perianal surgery patients. This information will contribute to the understanding of effective pain management strategies for individuals undergoing perianal surgical procedures and potentially reduce the need for opioids and improve patient outcomes.
Rationale: Perianal fistula is a burdening disease with an annual prevalence of 2/100.000 in the Dutch population. More than 90% of crypto-glandular fistulas originate from anorectal abscess. Despite adequate drainage of anorectal abscess up to 83% recurs or results in an anal fistula, the majority developing within 12 months. Up till now it is not common practice to routinely administer prophylactic antibiotics to prevent anal fistula development.\ Objective: The objective of this trial is to establish if adding antibiotic treatment to surgical drainage of perianal abscess results in less perianal fistulas. Study design: The study concerns a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial with treatment of perianal abscess by surgical drainage alone or combined with antibiotic treatment. Patients will be accrued by all participating clinics. The design involves allocation of all appropriate consecutive patients with a primary occurrence of perianal abscess to surgical drainage followed by either antibiotics or placebo. Data will be analyzed on 'intention to treat' basis in case patients are not subjected to the randomized treatment modality. Study population: Men and women of 18 years and older who present for the first time with a perianal abscess. Intervention (if applicable): The antibiotic group receives 7 days of oral metronidazole (500 mg every eight hours) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg every twelve hours) in addition to surgical drainage. The other group receives surgical drainage and postoperatively identical placebo tablets. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome measure is development of a perianal fistula. Secondary outcome measures are quality of life at 12 months measured with the EQ-5D-5L with Dutch rating. Further: in-hospital direct and indirect costs and out-of hospital postoperative costs, need of repeated drainage, patient related outcome (PRO) and clinical outcome measures. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: For this study, patients are asked to take part in a study comparing the addition of antibiotic treatment to surgical drainage of perianal abscess. Patients will not be burdened by extra hospital visits. At baseline participants will complete PRO questionnaires. Also at 1 week and 3, 6 and 12 months participants will fulfill the PRO questionnaires. These will be send to them by email and will take approximately 10 minutes each time.
Drainage of perianal abscesses is a well established treatment. Traditionally its been done in general anesthesia after the swelling has been localised its been drained with a knife. After surgical intervention complications can occur with recidivism, chronic fistulas that go from the anal to the skin and sometimes the anal sphincter is damaged which can cause problems with incontinence. Through ultrasound the abscess is opened under more controlled forms with a better visual overview. This is a new technique that has not been tested in larger studies. The aim with ultrasound-drainage as with traditional incision to drain the abscess so that the infected area can heal. The hypothesis is a reduction of recurrences and formation of fistulas with the use of 3D ultrasonography.