View clinical trials related to Periampullary Carcinoma.
Filter by:The goal of this observational study is to classify patients that undergo pancreatic resection for presumed pancreatic or periampullary malignancy into high and low risk groups for postoperative complications based on longitudinal saliva, rectal/faecal, tumor, blood and/or bile microbiome profiles. To identify the dynamics of the microbiome, as well as the possibly related short-term and long-term complications, multiple samples at different timepoints are needed from the patients.
A clinical database has been prospectively maintained by the investigators, with details of pancreatic resections since January 2016. It includes pre-operative details, details of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting, details of pre-operative biliary stenting, intra-operative details, post-operative morbidity and mortality, details of histopathological diagnosis, recurrence and survival. Data was collected onto the database (excel sheet) from trust data software, clinic letters, Somerset Cancer registry and clinical portal.
laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD) and Robot Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), as two minimally invasive methods of pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD), have obvious advantages over traditional open pancreaticoduodenectomy(OPD) in terms of reducing surgical trauma and hospitalization time, but there are few studies on their perioperative safety and prognostic effects.However, there are few studies on the perioperative safety and prognostic effects of both procedures. In this trial, the perioperative data and prognosis of both procedures were collected and analyzed through a prospective, multicenter approach to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of both procedures.
Further studies are needed to investigate the prognosis and perioperative safety of patients undergoing robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy. In this study, clinical data and prognostic data of patients undergoing this procedure were prospectively collected and analyzed to explore its safety and efficacy.
Aim of the study : To evaluate the effect and safety of "Heidelberg Triangle" dissection (TRIANGLE operation) combined with Pancreatoduodenectomy or Distal Pancreatectomy on the prognosis of pancreatic cancer and periampullary cancer . Methods : Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or Distal Pancreatectomy between 01 September 2016 and 30 December 2022 will be included in this retrospective analysis. 3D reconstruction is performed with preoperative enhanced CT, then the region of "Heidelberg Triangle" is categorized . The operation is completed by the same operation team. According to the operation mode, patients were divided into TRIANGLE group and non-TRIANGLE group and And followed up until recurrence, death or missed.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy, as a standard surgical procedure for malignant tumors of the head of the pancreas, ampulla and distal common bile duct, has brought the hope of clinical cure for these diseases.In the whole surgical process, the resection of the uncinate process of the pancreas is considered to be a major difficulty in the whole operation, which can affect the rehabilitation process and long-term prognosis. Two main methods have been developed around the dissection of the uncinate process of the pancreas. One is the Venous-first approach based on the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein axis. The other is the Artery-first approach that first explores whether the superior mesenteric artery is invaded by the tumor to judge resectable. The latter is gradually promoted in clinical practice because it can reduce intraoperative bleeding, reduce postoperative complications, and improve long-term prognosis. The intermediate approach is a surgical approach based on the Artery-first approach and adapted to the layout of the robot arm. The area between superior mesenteric artery and superior mesenteric vein was used as an intermediate area to treat the uncinate process of the pancreas in order to reduce perioperative complications and achieve better surgical results. However, the safety and effectiveness of intermediate approach have not been verified,in this prospective clinical study, the investigators will use a robotic surgical platform to perform robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery through the intermediate approach to verify its safety and efficacy.
Randomized Clinical Trial Investigating Multidimensional Prehabilitation in Pancreatic Surgery for participants with Pancreatic and Periampullary Neoplasms
The aim of this study is to outline the incidence of early and late reoperation after PD, examine the risk factors for early surgical intervention and its impact on the surgical outcome, hospital stay, diseases recurrence and patient survival, address variable indications for late readmission and reoperation after PD and its impact on patient survival and disease recurrence.
the study is designed to compare the blood loss between laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy in a randomized clinical trial
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most complicated surgical procedure and one of the standard treatments for benign and malignant disease of pancreatic head and periampullary region. Improvements in surgical techniques and the perioperative management of patients undergoing PD have reduced the surgical mortality rates to less than 3% in high-volume medical centers. However, the incidence of postoperative complication remains high, which ranges from 30% to 50% and the pancreatic fistula rate ranges from 5% to 40%. The key point of PD is still the enteric reconstruction of pancreatic stump. There were different techniques of enteric reconstruction, including: invagination pancreaticojejunostomy, binding pancreaticojejunostomy, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy, and pancreaticogastrostomy and each technique had its advantages and disadvantages. We established a new digestive reconstruction technique named shark mouth modified pancreaticojejunostomy, which had theoretical advantages including easier performed; lower tension and less complication. The shark mouth modified pancreaticojejunostomy is an end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy procedure which is between invagination pancreaticojejunostomy and binding pancreaticojejunostomy.The remnant of jejunum is shaped as shark mouth and then sutured with the pancreas remnant. After the surgery, the patients will be well followed up. The pancreaticojejunostomy time, post-operation complication, mortality and hospital stay will be documented to study the safety, efficiency and advantage of this new procedure.